Selection of subcontractors using ordinal ranking methods based on Condorcet approach
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 15 No. 4 (2016)
-
Influence of modeling of low-water bridge spans on the maximum value of stress in the main girders
Artur Duchaczek005-015
-
Cyclists as the element that creates the city
Katarzyna Szmygin017-022
-
Wooden construction in sacral architecture in the past and today
Wojciech Mielnik023-031
-
Selection of subcontractors using ordinal ranking methods based on Condorcet approach
Sławomir Biruk, Piotr Jaśkowski033-040
-
Agrorecreational ecoparks in the quarries territory as a new type of urban production (on the example of Kryvbas)
Taras Rudenko, Tetiana Mukha, Mariia Rudenko041-051
-
Fire analysis of structures in terms of physical phenomena observed during uniaxial tensile tests of steel
Wojciech Skowroński063-074
-
Use of basalt powder in a cementitious mortar and concrete as a substitute of sand
Magdalena Dobiszewska075-085
-
The quality and conditions of life in Siechnice – social research
Milena Stettner087-100
-
The rating of reduce the loss of heat energy in multi-family building as a result of the thermomodernization
Monika Jarosz-Hadam, Stanisław Fic101-108
-
The studies of the dynamic and material parameters of reinforced concrete elements with the addition of zeolite tuffs and plasticizer
Jacek Szulej109-116
-
Regeneration of pavement with modifiers based on ecological materials
Michał Babiak; Maria Ratajczak; Jacek Kosno117-126
-
Interpretation of the welding incompatibility in the T-joint with backing strip during ultrasonic test
Marcin Górecki, Michał Jordan127-137
-
Detection of ventilation paths using morphometric method in the selected part of Lodz
Anna Bochenek, Katarzyna Klemm139-151
-
An attempt to use Discrete Element Method in solid mechanics
Tomasz Nowicki153-162
-
Comparative analysis of survey on humidity carried out by chemical way in proportion to gravimetric survey on selected building materials
Maciej Trochonowicz, Bartosz Szostak, Daniel Lisiecki163-171
-
Protecting of spatial and cultural value of Downtown Lublin, by maintenance of modernist edifice of the Universal Department Store in Lublin
Karol Krupa, Maciej Trochonowicz173-181
-
The analysis of consistency evaluation of the loess in Lublin based on CPT tests
Krzysztof Nepelski, Agnieszka Lal, Małgorzata Franus183-194
-
Analysis of cantilever composite beam work with regards to the different thickness and location of adhesive joint made of elastic-ideally plastic material
Bartosz Kawecki, Jerzy Podgórski195-208
-
An analysis of the impact strength of concrete components as a factor influencing the bond strength in unreinforced composite concrete elements
Dominika Franczak-Balmas053-061
Archives
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2019-10-10 15
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2019-10-10 21
-
Vol. 16 No. 4
2019-10-14 14
-
Vol. 16 No. 3
2019-10-14 15
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2019-10-14 12
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2019-10-15 20
-
Vol. 15 No. 4
2019-10-17 19
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2019-10-15 13
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2019-10-16 14
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2019-10-09 28
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2020-04-07 19
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2020-04-15 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2020-04-20 15
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2020-04-25 14
-
Vol. 13 No. 4
2020-06-24 48
-
Vol. 13 No. 3
2020-06-24 43
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2020-07-15 43
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2020-07-15 30
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
A choice of a subcontractor may have critical impact on realization of the project, it has influence on the cost, duration, and quality. Selection of the best sucontractor can be defined as multiple criteria decision making problem (MCDM) of choosing a proper offer from set of alternatives evaluated by using set of criteria. Decision maker should determine the criteria as objective and measurable. Significance of decision making problem is presented by large amount of theories and methods developed for solving MCDM problems and number of criteria considered in these problems. A Condorcet method (formulated over two centuries ago) is commonly accepted for democratic (majority of criteria determines the winner) and fair election – a Condorcet winner is the alternative which is preferred in all pair-wise comparisons. According to social choice theory where a Condorcet winner cannot be obtained from a set of alternatives, the best solution is close to being a Condorcet winner. The paper presents four selection methods of the best alternative that is as close as possible to being a Condorcet winner and contains examples of a subcontractor selection using only ordinal scales of evaluation of alternatives.
Keywords:
References
[2] Ng S.T., Skitmore M. and Chung,W.F. Ten Basic Factors to Indentify Suitable Subcontractors for Construction Projects. Proc. CIB TG 23 International Conference, Hong Kong, 2003.
[3] Taruna D., Rajiv Bhatt R. and Bhavsar J.J. Methodology for Ranking of Factors Affecting Selection of Subcontractor for Construction Contractors of Gujarat. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) 32(1) (2016) 19-25.
[4] Al-Harbi K.M.A.-S. Application of the AHP in Project Management. International Journal of Project Management 19(1) (2001) 19-27.
[5] Alptekin O. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach in Contractor Selection. International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences 8(2) (2014) 6-9.
[6] Anagnostopoulos K.P., Vavatsikos A.P. An AHP Model for Construction Contractor Prequalification. Operational Research. An International Journal 6(3) (2006) 333-346.
[7] Fong P.S.-W., Choi S.K.-Y. Final Contractor Selection Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Construction Management and Economics 18 (2000) 547-557.
[8] Saaty R.W. The Analytic Hierarchy Process – What It Is and How It Is Used. Mathematical Modelling 9(3-5) (1987) 161-176.
[9] Mohaghar A., Faqhei M.S. Contractor Selection Using Extended TOPSIS Technique with Interval – Valued Triangular Fuzzy Numbers. Global Business and Economics Research Journal 2(5) (2013) 55-65.
[10] Plebankiewicz E. A Fuzzy Sets Based Contractor Prequalification Procedure. Automation in Construction 22 (2012) 433-443.
[11] Arrow K.J., Raynaud H. Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision Making. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1986.
[12] Slater P. Inconsistencies in a Schedule of Paired Comparisons. Biometrika 48 (1961) 303-312.
[13] Hudry O. On the Difficulty of Computing the Winners of a Tournament. Annales du LAMSADE n 6, actes du Workshop on Voting Theory and Preference Modelling, DIMACS (2006) 181-191.
[14] Charon I., Hudry O. A branch-and-Bound Algorithm to Solve the Linear Ordering Problem for Weighted Tournaments. Discrete Applied Mathematics 154 (2006) 2097-2116.
[15] Festa P., Pardalos P.M., Resende M.G.C. Feedback Set Problems, [in:] Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization (Eds. Du D.Z., Pardalos P.M.). Vol. A, Kluwer 2009, 209-258.
[16] Sukegawa N., Mizuno S. Redundancy of the Transitivity Constraints in the Ordering Problem. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technical Report No. 2014-2, Tokyo Institute of Technology JAPAN, 2104.
[17] Young H.P. Extending Condorcet’s Rule. Journal of Economic Theory 16 (1997) 335-353.
[18] Betzler N., Guo J., Niedermeier R. Parameterized Computational Complexity of Dodgson and Young Elections. Information and Computation 208(2) (2010) 165-177.
[19] Caragiannis I., Cove, J.A., Feldma, M., Homan C.M., Kaklamanis C., Karanikolas N., Procaccia A.D., Rosenschein J.S. On the Approximability of Dodgson and Young Elections. Artificial Intelligence (187–188) (2012) 31-51.
[20] Bartholdi III J., Tovey C.A., Trick M.A. Voting Schemes for Which It Can Be Difficult to Tell Who Won the Election. Social Choice and Welfare 6(2) (1989) 157-165.
[21] Tideman T.N. Independence of Clones as a Criterion for Voting Rules. Social Choice and Welfare 4(3) (1987) 185– 206.
[22] Nurmi H. Settings of Consensual Processes: Candidates, Verdicts, Policies, [in:] Consensual Processes. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. (Eds. Herrera-Viedma E., García-Lapresta J.L., Kacprzyk J., Fedrizzi M., Nurmi H. and Zadrożny S.), Berlin Heidelberg, Springer, 2011, 159-178.
[23] Smith W.D. Descriptions of Single-Winner Voting Systems. temple.edu/wds/ homepage/votedesc.pdf, 2006.
Article Details
Abstract views: 302
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.
