Holistic assessment of building behaviour in severe earthquakes: integrating ground response with structural dynamics and ground motion assessment

Main Article Content

Lindung Zalbuin Mase

lmase@unib.ac.id

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-0149
Aza Shelina

67016001@kmitl.ac.th

Aminah Rahmadani Lubis

g1b021039.aminahlubis@mhs.unib.ac.id

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8006-2657
Defina Yuandita

g1b021044.defina@mhs.unib.ac.id

Jiratchaya Ayawanna

jiratchaya@sut.ac.th

Salisa Chaiyaput

salisa.ch@kmitl.ac.th

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3996-0805

Abstract

This study analyses the Moot Court at the University of Bengkulu, Indonesia. The seismic ground response analysis and dynamic analysis are performed. The ground-motion parameters and the intensity of ground shaking are also discussed. The distribution of internal forces and stress ratio is presented. The identification of the weak structure and the retrofitting solution is analysed. The results show that ground-motion amplification can occur, potentially increasing peak ground acceleration by a factor of 1.684. The intensity parameters also indicate that ground surface motion has greater potential for seismic damage than at the pile-tip layers. Several beams are identified as weak structures. Retrofitting is carried out to overcome weaknesses in structural elements using the concrete jacketing method. The increase in cross-sectional area of the weakened beam is 52%, 47%, and 53% compared to the previous beam dimensions, and adding reinforcement could be effective in optimising overall structure performance.

Keywords:

seismic response analysis, dynamic analysis, structure inspection, retrofitting, concrete jacketing

Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)

  • Industry, Innovation, Technology and Infrastructure
  • Sustainable cities and communities

References

Article Details

“Holistic assessment of building behaviour in severe earthquakes: integrating ground response with structural dynamics and ground motion assessment” (2026) Budownictwo i Architektura / Civil and Architectural Engineering, 25(3), p. 26044. doi:10.35784/bud-arch.8898.