Analysis and Audit of Reporting on Sustainable Development for Trade Networks and Directions for Their Improvement
Alla Us
allaus2@ukr.netKyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-7694
Karina Nazarova
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-9244
Abstract
In the modern world, the issue of achieving a sustainable economic development model is becoming more and more urgent. One of its components is compliance with the Goal of sustainable development by companies and verification by state authorities and independent auditors of companies in matters of environmental sustainability. Thus, consideration of modern methods of submission and audit of sustainable development reports (SDR), analysis of opportunities for their improvement becomes relevant. In this work, attention is paid to companies engaged in retail trade, taking into account the peculiarities that they face when submitting the SDR. The purpose of the research was to conduct an analysis of the most common methods of reporting on sustainable development and to develop an effective model (and recommendations for it) for auditing and analyzing sustainable development reporting. Modeling became the main method when writing the paper, taking into account the developed model of analysis and verification of the SDR. The article proposed a new model of verification of non-financial information in sustainability reporting and its graphical display in the audit report. On its basis, it becomes possible to build a new methodology for the audit of the SDR. In addition, the most common international methods of SDR were analyzed, namely the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). The authors concluded that the GRI is the most universal of the three, while the SASB is focused only on investors. IIRC, being similar to both described above, is an intermediate option. Nevertheless, submission according to the SASB system is the most effective for trade networks, taking into account the peculiarities of the functioning of this type of companies and the level of their influence on the external environment. The results of the conducted research and the data presented in the article make it possible to evaluate the modern methods of submitting financial statements in a new way and provide a basis for building new standards for the audit of these reports.
Keywords:
accounting, sustainability, retail trade companies, international audit, modelingReferences
ACCOUNTABILITY.OTG, 2019, Assurance Standards, https://www.accountability.org/standards/.
Google Scholar
AL-SHAER H., ZAMAN M., 2019, CEO compensation and sustainability reporting assurance: evidence from the UK, Journal of Business Ethics 158: 233-252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8
Google Scholar
BARYSHNIKOVA O.M., 2016, Features of the organization of the system of verification of sustainable development reporting, Economy and State, 8: 131-140.
Google Scholar
BOIRAL O., HERAS-SAIZARBITORIA I., BROTHERTON M., 2019, Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: the auditors’ perspective, Journal of Business Ethics 155: 703-721, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4
Google Scholar
BUSCO C., CONSOLANDI C., ECCLES R.G., SOFRA E., 2020, A Preliminary Analysis of SASB Reporting: Disclosure Topics, Financial Relevance, and the Financial Intensity of ESG Materiality, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 22(2): 117-125, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3548849.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12411
Google Scholar
CHEN H.S.Y., CHENG T.C.E., 2021, Shades of green: HOPF for standardized environmental performance indicators, Sustainable Resource Management 1: 241-271, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00017-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00017-1
Google Scholar
CORPORATE REGISTER, 2021, Live charts, https://www.corporateregister.com/livecharts.
Google Scholar
Decree 2012-557 on obligations regarding transparency on social and environmental disclosure by companies, 2012, https://cutt.ly/LV3VpG2.
Google Scholar
Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, 2014, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj.
Google Scholar
ECCLES R.G., CHENG B., SALTZMAN D., 2010, The Landscape of Integrated Reporting, Bussines School, Harvard.
Google Scholar
GAMKALO O.B., 2017, Non-Financial Reporting as an Instrument for Measuring the Social Activity of Domestic Enterprises, Statistics of Ukraine 4: 79-86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31767/su.4(79).2017.04.10
Google Scholar
GERWANSKI J., 2020, Does it pay off? Integrated reporting and cost of debt: European evidence, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(5): 2299-2319, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1965.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1965
Google Scholar
GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE, 2022, Standards, https://www.globalreporting.org/standard/.
Google Scholar
GOVERNMENT OFFICIES OF SWEDEN, 2007, Guidelines for external reporting by state-owned companies, 2007, https://www.government.se/information-material/2007/12/guidelines-for-external-reporting-by-state-owned-companies/.
Google Scholar
GRAY R., 2020, Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: a review and comment, International Journal of Auditing,4(3): 247-268, DOI: 10.1111/1099-1123.00316.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00316
Google Scholar
HERZIG C., PIANOWSKI M., 2009, Business management, Wirtschaften im Unternehmen, Stuttgart.
Google Scholar
International Integrated Reporting Council, 2022, https://www.iasplus.com/en-gb/resources/global-organisations/iirc.
Google Scholar
International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000, 2013, https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-assurance-engagements-isae-3000-revised-assurance-engagements-other-audits-or-0.
Google Scholar
IOANNOU I., SERAFEIM G., 2011, The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting, Harvard Business School Research Working Paper 11(100): 49-60.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1799589
Google Scholar
ISMAYILOV V.I., ALMASOV N.N., MUSAYEV N.S., SAMEDOVA A.Q., 2021, Influence of internal production conditions on the efficiency and competitiveness of enterprises, Future Business Journal 7(1): 40, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00086-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00086-5
Google Scholar
ISO, 2010, ISO-26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility, https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/42546.html.
Google Scholar
ISO, 2022, ISO 14000 Environmental management, https://www.iso.org/ru/iso-14001-environmental-management.html.
Google Scholar
JONES P., COMFORT D., 2021, Leading European Retailers and the Sustainable Development Goals, Journal of Sustainability Research 3(1): e210001, https://doi.org/: 10.20900/jsr20210001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20210001
Google Scholar
KAYA I., 2017, Sustainability reporting assurance: a literature survey. Regional Studies on Economic Growth, Fi-nancial Economics and Management, Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/: 10.1007/978-3-319-54112-9_3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54112-9_3
Google Scholar
KETNERS K., 2020, Spending review as essential part of public sector budgeting: Latvian experience, Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference Economic Science for Rural Development 53: 97-106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2020.53.011
Google Scholar
KOK P., VAN DER WIELE T., MCKENNA R., BROWN A.A., 2001, Corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework, Journal of Business Ethics 31: 285-297, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010767001610.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010767001610
Google Scholar
KPMG, 2010, Corporate Governance Code King III, https://cutt.ly/IV3V4Ph.
Google Scholar
KPMG, 2021, The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting, https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ xx/pdf/2020/11/the-time-has-come.pdf.
Google Scholar
LUEG K., LUEG R., 2021, Deconstructing corporate sustainability narratives: A taxonomy for critical assessment of integrated reporting types, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26(6): 1785-1800, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2152.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2152
Google Scholar
MAKARENKO I., KRAVCHENKO O., OVCHAROVA N., ZEMLYAK N., MAKARENKO S., 2020, Standardiza-tion of audit reporting on sustainable development of companies, Agricultural and Resource Economics 6(2): 78-90.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.05
Google Scholar
MARTINKOVIC M., 2021, Development of the party system and the character of coalition governments in Slovakia in the years 2006-2016, Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Filosofiya-Sotsiologiya-Politologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy Sociology and Political Science 60: 194-205, https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/17
Google Scholar
MAZURYK O.V., 2015, Social audit as a modern diagnostic technology: theoretical and methodological principles of research, Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University 1148(34): 107-113.
Google Scholar
MELNYK K.P., 2019, Formalization of the subject area of audit in terms of sustainable development, Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis 3(44): 34-39.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2019-3(44)-34-39
Google Scholar
MICHELON G., PATTEN D.M., ROMI A.N., 2019, Creating legitimacy for sustainability assurance practices: evi-dence from sustainability restatements, European Accounting Review 28(2): 395-422, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180. 2018.1469424.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1469424
Google Scholar
MORIMOTO R., ASH J., HOPE C., 2005, Corporate social responsibility audit: from theory to practice, Journal of Business Ethics,62: 315-325, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5
Google Scholar
SAJ, 2007, SAJSA8000 Standard, https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/.
Google Scholar
SHERRY B., 2021, More Than Half of S&P Global 1200 Now Disclose Using SASB Standards, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/09/22/2301122/0/en/More-Than-Half-of-S-P-Global-1200-Now-Disclose-Using-SASB-Standards.html.
Google Scholar
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, 2022, https://www.sasb.org/.
Google Scholar
TAIWAN STOCK EXCHANGE, 2021, Corporation Rules Governing the Preparation and Filing of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports by TWSE Listed Companies, https://cutt.ly/AV3Biio.
Google Scholar
UN, 2020, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
Google Scholar
VASILIEVA T., LIEONOV S., MAKARENKO I., SIRKOVSKA N., 2017, Sustainability information disclosure as an instrument of marketing communication with stakeholders: markets, social and economic aspects, Marketing and Management of Innovation 4: 350-357, https://doi.org/10.21272/MMI.2017.4-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.4-31
Google Scholar
VELTE P., 2021, Archival Research on Integrated Reporting: a Systematic Review of Main Drivers and the Impact of Integrated Reporting on Firm Value, Journal of Management and Governance 26: 997-1061, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w
Google Scholar
VOROBEY V., ZHUROVSKA I., 2021, Non-financial reporting: tools of socially responsible business, FOP O.M. Kostyuchenko, Kyiv.
Google Scholar
WADDOCK S., SMITH N., 2000, Corporate Responsibility Audits: Doing Well by Doing Good, Sloan Management Review 41(2): 75-83.
Google Scholar
YANG Y., ORZES G., JILA F., 2019, Does GRI Sustainability Reporting Pay Off? An Empirical Investigation of Publicly Listed Firms in China, Business & Society 60(7): 1738-1772, https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319831632.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319831632
Google Scholar
ZEMLYAK N.V., SERPENINOVA Y.S., 2020, Methods of Reporting on Sustainable Development and its Audit, Educational and Scientific Institute of Business Technologies, Sumy.
Google Scholar
Authors
Alla Usallaus2@ukr.net
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-7694
Authors
Karina NazarovaKyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-9244
Statistics
Abstract views: 331PDF downloads: 303
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.