Analysis and Audit of Reporting on Sustainable Development for Trade Networks and Directions for Their Improvement

Alla Us

allaus2@ukr.net
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-7694

Karina Nazarova


Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-9244

Abstract

In the modern world, the issue of achieving a sustainable economic development model is becoming more and more urgent. One of its components is compliance with the Goal of sustainable development by companies and verification by state authorities and independent auditors of companies in matters of environmental sustainability. Thus, consideration of modern methods of submission and audit of sustainable development reports (SDR), analysis of opportunities for their improvement becomes relevant. In this work, attention is paid to companies engaged in retail trade, taking into account the peculiarities that they face when submitting the SDR. The purpose of the research was to conduct an analysis of the most common methods of reporting on sustainable development and to develop an effective model (and recommendations for it) for auditing and analyzing sustainable development reporting. Modeling became the main method when writing the paper, taking into account the developed model of analysis and verification of the SDR. The article proposed a new model of verification of non-financial information in sustainability reporting and its graphical display in the audit report. On its basis, it becomes possible to build a new methodology for the audit of the SDR. In addition, the most common international methods of SDR were analyzed, namely the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). The authors concluded that the GRI is the most universal of the three, while the SASB is focused only on investors. IIRC, being similar to both described above, is an intermediate option. Nevertheless, submission according to the SASB system is the most effective for trade networks, taking into account the peculiarities of the functioning of this type of companies and the level of their influence on the external environment. The results of the conducted research and the data presented in the article make it possible to evaluate the modern methods of submitting financial statements in a new way and provide a basis for building new standards for the audit of these reports.


Keywords:

accounting, sustainability, retail trade companies, international audit, modeling

ACCOUNTABILITY.OTG, 2019, Assurance Standards, https://www.accountability.org/standards/.
  Google Scholar

AL-SHAER H., ZAMAN M., 2019, CEO compensation and sustainability reporting assurance: evidence from the UK, Journal of Business Ethics 158: 233-252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8   Google Scholar

BARYSHNIKOVA O.M., 2016, Features of the organization of the system of verification of sustainable development reporting, Economy and State, 8: 131-140.
  Google Scholar

BOIRAL O., HERAS-SAIZARBITORIA I., BROTHERTON M., 2019, Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: the auditors’ perspective, Journal of Business Ethics 155: 703-721, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4   Google Scholar

BUSCO C., CONSOLANDI C., ECCLES R.G., SOFRA E., 2020, A Preliminary Analysis of SASB Reporting: Disclosure Topics, Financial Relevance, and the Financial Intensity of ESG Materiality, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 22(2): 117-125, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3548849.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12411   Google Scholar

CHEN H.S.Y., CHENG T.C.E., 2021, Shades of green: HOPF for standardized environmental performance indicators, Sustainable Resource Management 1: 241-271, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00017-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00017-1   Google Scholar

CORPORATE REGISTER, 2021, Live charts, https://www.corporateregister.com/livecharts.
  Google Scholar

Decree 2012-557 on obligations regarding transparency on social and environmental disclosure by companies, 2012, https://cutt.ly/LV3VpG2.
  Google Scholar

Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, 2014, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj.
  Google Scholar

ECCLES R.G., CHENG B., SALTZMAN D., 2010, The Landscape of Integrated Reporting, Bussines School, Harvard.
  Google Scholar

GAMKALO O.B., 2017, Non-Financial Reporting as an Instrument for Measuring the Social Activity of Domestic Enterprises, Statistics of Ukraine 4: 79-86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31767/su.4(79).2017.04.10   Google Scholar

GERWANSKI J., 2020, Does it pay off? Integrated reporting and cost of debt: European evidence, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(5): 2299-2319, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1965.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1965   Google Scholar

GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE, 2022, Standards, https://www.globalreporting.org/standard/.
  Google Scholar

GOVERNMENT OFFICIES OF SWEDEN, 2007, Guidelines for external reporting by state-owned companies, 2007, https://www.government.se/information-material/2007/12/guidelines-for-external-reporting-by-state-owned-companies/.
  Google Scholar

GRAY R., 2020, Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: a review and comment, International Journal of Auditing,4(3): 247-268, DOI: 10.1111/1099-1123.00316.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00316   Google Scholar

HERZIG C., PIANOWSKI M., 2009, Business management, Wirtschaften im Unternehmen, Stuttgart.
  Google Scholar

International Integrated Reporting Council, 2022, https://www.iasplus.com/en-gb/resources/global-organisations/iirc.
  Google Scholar

International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000, 2013, https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-assurance-engagements-isae-3000-revised-assurance-engagements-other-audits-or-0.
  Google Scholar

IOANNOU I., SERAFEIM G., 2011, The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting, Harvard Business School Research Working Paper 11(100): 49-60.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1799589   Google Scholar

ISMAYILOV V.I., ALMASOV N.N., MUSAYEV N.S., SAMEDOVA A.Q., 2021, Influence of internal production conditions on the efficiency and competitiveness of enterprises, Future Business Journal 7(1): 40, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00086-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00086-5   Google Scholar

ISO, 2010, ISO-26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility, https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/42546.html.
  Google Scholar

ISO, 2022, ISO 14000 Environmental management, https://www.iso.org/ru/iso-14001-environmental-management.html.
  Google Scholar

JONES P., COMFORT D., 2021, Leading European Retailers and the Sustainable Development Goals, Journal of Sustainability Research 3(1): e210001, https://doi.org/: 10.20900/jsr20210001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20210001   Google Scholar

KAYA I., 2017, Sustainability reporting assurance: a literature survey. Regional Studies on Economic Growth, Fi-nancial Economics and Management, Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/: 10.1007/978-3-319-54112-9_3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54112-9_3   Google Scholar

KETNERS K., 2020, Spending review as essential part of public sector budgeting: Latvian experience, Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference Economic Science for Rural Development 53: 97-106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2020.53.011   Google Scholar

KOK P., VAN DER WIELE T., MCKENNA R., BROWN A.A., 2001, Corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework, Journal of Business Ethics 31: 285-297, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010767001610.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010767001610   Google Scholar

KPMG, 2010, Corporate Governance Code King III, https://cutt.ly/IV3V4Ph.
  Google Scholar

KPMG, 2021, The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting, https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ xx/pdf/2020/11/the-time-has-come.pdf.
  Google Scholar

LUEG K., LUEG R., 2021, Deconstructing corporate sustainability narratives: A taxonomy for critical assessment of integrated reporting types, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26(6): 1785-1800, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2152.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2152   Google Scholar

MAKARENKO I., KRAVCHENKO O., OVCHAROVA N., ZEMLYAK N., MAKARENKO S., 2020, Standardiza-tion of audit reporting on sustainable development of companies, Agricultural and Resource Economics 6(2): 78-90.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.05   Google Scholar

MARTINKOVIC M., 2021, Development of the party system and the character of coalition governments in Slovakia in the years 2006-2016, Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Filosofiya-Sotsiologiya-Politologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy Sociology and Political Science 60: 194-205, https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/17   Google Scholar

MAZURYK O.V., 2015, Social audit as a modern diagnostic technology: theoretical and methodological principles of research, Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University 1148(34): 107-113.
  Google Scholar

MELNYK K.P., 2019, Formalization of the subject area of audit in terms of sustainable development, Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis 3(44): 34-39.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2019-3(44)-34-39   Google Scholar

MICHELON G., PATTEN D.M., ROMI A.N., 2019, Creating legitimacy for sustainability assurance practices: evi-dence from sustainability restatements, European Accounting Review 28(2): 395-422, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180. 2018.1469424.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1469424   Google Scholar

MORIMOTO R., ASH J., HOPE C., 2005, Corporate social responsibility audit: from theory to practice, Journal of Business Ethics,62: 315-325, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5   Google Scholar

SAJ, 2007, SAJSA8000 Standard, https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/.
  Google Scholar

SHERRY B., 2021, More Than Half of S&P Global 1200 Now Disclose Using SASB Standards, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/09/22/2301122/0/en/More-Than-Half-of-S-P-Global-1200-Now-Disclose-Using-SASB-Standards.html.
  Google Scholar

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, 2022, https://www.sasb.org/.
  Google Scholar

TAIWAN STOCK EXCHANGE, 2021, Corporation Rules Governing the Preparation and Filing of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports by TWSE Listed Companies, https://cutt.ly/AV3Biio.
  Google Scholar

UN, 2020, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
  Google Scholar

VASILIEVA T., LIEONOV S., MAKARENKO I., SIRKOVSKA N., 2017, Sustainability information disclosure as an instrument of marketing communication with stakeholders: markets, social and economic aspects, Marketing and Management of Innovation 4: 350-357, https://doi.org/10.21272/MMI.2017.4-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.4-31   Google Scholar

VELTE P., 2021, Archival Research on Integrated Reporting: a Systematic Review of Main Drivers and the Impact of Integrated Reporting on Firm Value, Journal of Management and Governance 26: 997-1061, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w   Google Scholar

VOROBEY V., ZHUROVSKA I., 2021, Non-financial reporting: tools of socially responsible business, FOP O.M. Kostyuchenko, Kyiv.
  Google Scholar

WADDOCK S., SMITH N., 2000, Corporate Responsibility Audits: Doing Well by Doing Good, Sloan Management Review 41(2): 75-83.
  Google Scholar

YANG Y., ORZES G., JILA F., 2019, Does GRI Sustainability Reporting Pay Off? An Empirical Investigation of Publicly Listed Firms in China, Business & Society 60(7): 1738-1772, https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319831632.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319831632   Google Scholar

ZEMLYAK N.V., SERPENINOVA Y.S., 2020, Methods of Reporting on Sustainable Development and its Audit, Educational and Scientific Institute of Business Technologies, Sumy.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2023-07-07

Cited by

Us, A., & Nazarova, K. (2023). Analysis and Audit of Reporting on Sustainable Development for Trade Networks and Directions for Their Improvement . Problemy Ekorozwoju, 18(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.4032

Authors

Alla Us 
allaus2@ukr.net
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-7694

Authors

Karina Nazarova 

Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-9244

Statistics

Abstract views: 331
PDF downloads: 303