Analysis and Audit of Reporting on Sustainable Development for Trade Networks and Directions for Their Improvement
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023)
-
The Future of Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development Journal
Artur Pawłowski7-12
-
From the Territory of Recovery to Sustainable Development: a Methodological Concept of Effective Socio-economic Development of Ukraine after the War Development
Nataly Martynovych, Iryna Yemchenko, Tetiana Kulinich13-25
-
The Impact of the War in Ukraine on the Food Security of Low-Income Countries
Olena Shevchuk, Olha Ilyash, Serhii Kozlovskyi, Nadiia Roshchyna, Svitlana Hrynkevych, Vira Butenko, Glib Mazhara26-41
-
Is the Current Reality Conducive to the Implementation of Sustainable Development?
Wiesław Sztumski42-48
-
Relationships between Wellbeing and Sustainable Development in a Group of Selected Developed Countries
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser, Rastko Gajanin49-77
-
Comparison of Japan and OECD Countries in Terms of Well-Being Resources
Fatma Ince78-85
-
Towards a Political Economy of Renewable Energy: Does Democracy and Globalization Matter for Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs)
Orhan Cengiz, Müge Manga86-101
-
The Role of Education and Innovation in Renewable Energy Consumption in OECD and BRICS Countries
Junrong Li, Abid Rehman, Jamal Khan102-110
-
Towards Sustainable Development: Revisiting the Middle-Income Trap Hypothesis for the Southern Common Market Countries
Veli Yilanci, Uğur Ursavaş, Tamer Güven111-120
-
Philosophy of Sustainable Development: Understanding the Significance of Gender Equality in Business Organisations
Purnima Lenka121-127
-
Sustainable Livelihoods a Foundation for Rural Development Leads to Sustainability
Abhijeet Kumar, Avinash Kumar, Swati Kumari, Neha Kumari, Sneha Kumari, Puja Mishra128-140
-
Green Marketing: An Ethical and Anti-Environmental Resilient Approach for Sustainable Business
Sachin Chauhan, Naznin Naznin141-147
-
On the Relationship Between ISO Standards and Sustainable Development
Enriko Ceko148-158
-
Effect of Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Performance in Supply Chain Management
Shuang Wang, Guixian Tian, Tahir Islam, Farhan Zeb Khaskhelly, Maria Aijaz Shaikh159-166
-
Ecological Supply Chain: Tools For Evaluating E-Waste – World Perspective
Liao Meihui, Maryam Khokhar, Indrajit Patra167-182
-
Analysis and Audit of Reporting on Sustainable Development for Trade Networks and Directions for Their Improvement
Alla Us, Karina Nazarova183-192
-
Evaluation Model of Environmental Sustainable Competitive Tourism Based on Entropy
Danijela Pantović, Marija Kostić, Sonja Veljović, Milica Luković193-203
-
A Study on the Impact of Reform and Opening-up on Sustainable Development: Evidence from China
Linglin Xiang, Huaixi Zhang, Yiqing Lyu204-2015
-
Supervised Credit, Government Strategies and Green Development: Evidence from China
Bingbing Zhang216-228
-
Logistics of Smart Port in Ukraine: Problems and Prospects in the Conditions of Sustainable Development
Arsen Muradian, Olexiy Kuzkin, Natalia Remzina229-241
-
Investigating the Impact of Education and Women in Agriculture on Human Capital Outcomes in Africa: An Interaction Analysis
Zhichao Yu, Romanus Osabohien242-248
-
Environment, Economy and Society – the Body, Mind and Soul of Sustainable Design of Buildings
G Venkatesh249-253
-
Artificial Intelligence and Environmental Protection of Buildings
Zheng Chen, Yu He254-262
-
Reconstruction of the Urban Historical Centre: Contemporary Problems, Difficulties, and Perspectives
Jawdat Goussous, Kabila Faris Hmood263-267
-
Changing the Narrative of Nature: Towards Sustainability
Atreyee Mukherjee268-272
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
In the modern world, the issue of achieving a sustainable economic development model is becoming more and more urgent. One of its components is compliance with the Goal of sustainable development by companies and verification by state authorities and independent auditors of companies in matters of environmental sustainability. Thus, consideration of modern methods of submission and audit of sustainable development reports (SDR), analysis of opportunities for their improvement becomes relevant. In this work, attention is paid to companies engaged in retail trade, taking into account the peculiarities that they face when submitting the SDR. The purpose of the research was to conduct an analysis of the most common methods of reporting on sustainable development and to develop an effective model (and recommendations for it) for auditing and analyzing sustainable development reporting. Modeling became the main method when writing the paper, taking into account the developed model of analysis and verification of the SDR. The article proposed a new model of verification of non-financial information in sustainability reporting and its graphical display in the audit report. On its basis, it becomes possible to build a new methodology for the audit of the SDR. In addition, the most common international methods of SDR were analyzed, namely the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). The authors concluded that the GRI is the most universal of the three, while the SASB is focused only on investors. IIRC, being similar to both described above, is an intermediate option. Nevertheless, submission according to the SASB system is the most effective for trade networks, taking into account the peculiarities of the functioning of this type of companies and the level of their influence on the external environment. The results of the conducted research and the data presented in the article make it possible to evaluate the modern methods of submitting financial statements in a new way and provide a basis for building new standards for the audit of these reports.
Keywords:
References
ACCOUNTABILITY.OTG, 2019, Assurance Standards, https://www.accountability.org/standards/.
AL-SHAER H., ZAMAN M., 2019, CEO compensation and sustainability reporting assurance: evidence from the UK, Journal of Business Ethics 158: 233-252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8
BARYSHNIKOVA O.M., 2016, Features of the organization of the system of verification of sustainable development reporting, Economy and State, 8: 131-140.
BOIRAL O., HERAS-SAIZARBITORIA I., BROTHERTON M., 2019, Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: the auditors’ perspective, Journal of Business Ethics 155: 703-721, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4
BUSCO C., CONSOLANDI C., ECCLES R.G., SOFRA E., 2020, A Preliminary Analysis of SASB Reporting: Disclosure Topics, Financial Relevance, and the Financial Intensity of ESG Materiality, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 22(2): 117-125, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3548849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12411
CHEN H.S.Y., CHENG T.C.E., 2021, Shades of green: HOPF for standardized environmental performance indicators, Sustainable Resource Management 1: 241-271, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00017-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00017-1
CORPORATE REGISTER, 2021, Live charts, https://www.corporateregister.com/livecharts.
Decree 2012-557 on obligations regarding transparency on social and environmental disclosure by companies, 2012, https://cutt.ly/LV3VpG2.
Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, 2014, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj.
ECCLES R.G., CHENG B., SALTZMAN D., 2010, The Landscape of Integrated Reporting, Bussines School, Harvard.
GAMKALO O.B., 2017, Non-Financial Reporting as an Instrument for Measuring the Social Activity of Domestic Enterprises, Statistics of Ukraine 4: 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31767/su.4(79).2017.04.10
GERWANSKI J., 2020, Does it pay off? Integrated reporting and cost of debt: European evidence, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(5): 2299-2319, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1965
GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE, 2022, Standards, https://www.globalreporting.org/standard/.
GOVERNMENT OFFICIES OF SWEDEN, 2007, Guidelines for external reporting by state-owned companies, 2007, https://www.government.se/information-material/2007/12/guidelines-for-external-reporting-by-state-owned-companies/.
GRAY R., 2020, Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: a review and comment, International Journal of Auditing,4(3): 247-268, DOI: 10.1111/1099-1123.00316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00316
HERZIG C., PIANOWSKI M., 2009, Business management, Wirtschaften im Unternehmen, Stuttgart.
International Integrated Reporting Council, 2022, https://www.iasplus.com/en-gb/resources/global-organisations/iirc.
International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000, 2013, https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-assurance-engagements-isae-3000-revised-assurance-engagements-other-audits-or-0.
IOANNOU I., SERAFEIM G., 2011, The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting, Harvard Business School Research Working Paper 11(100): 49-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1799589
ISMAYILOV V.I., ALMASOV N.N., MUSAYEV N.S., SAMEDOVA A.Q., 2021, Influence of internal production conditions on the efficiency and competitiveness of enterprises, Future Business Journal 7(1): 40, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00086-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00086-5
ISO, 2010, ISO-26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility, https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/42546.html.
ISO, 2022, ISO 14000 Environmental management, https://www.iso.org/ru/iso-14001-environmental-management.html.
JONES P., COMFORT D., 2021, Leading European Retailers and the Sustainable Development Goals, Journal of Sustainability Research 3(1): e210001, https://doi.org/: 10.20900/jsr20210001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20210001
KAYA I., 2017, Sustainability reporting assurance: a literature survey. Regional Studies on Economic Growth, Fi-nancial Economics and Management, Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/: 10.1007/978-3-319-54112-9_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54112-9_3
KETNERS K., 2020, Spending review as essential part of public sector budgeting: Latvian experience, Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference Economic Science for Rural Development 53: 97-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2020.53.011
KOK P., VAN DER WIELE T., MCKENNA R., BROWN A.A., 2001, Corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework, Journal of Business Ethics 31: 285-297, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010767001610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010767001610
KPMG, 2010, Corporate Governance Code King III, https://cutt.ly/IV3V4Ph.
KPMG, 2021, The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting, https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ xx/pdf/2020/11/the-time-has-come.pdf.
LUEG K., LUEG R., 2021, Deconstructing corporate sustainability narratives: A taxonomy for critical assessment of integrated reporting types, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26(6): 1785-1800, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2152
MAKARENKO I., KRAVCHENKO O., OVCHAROVA N., ZEMLYAK N., MAKARENKO S., 2020, Standardiza-tion of audit reporting on sustainable development of companies, Agricultural and Resource Economics 6(2): 78-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.05
MARTINKOVIC M., 2021, Development of the party system and the character of coalition governments in Slovakia in the years 2006-2016, Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Filosofiya-Sotsiologiya-Politologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy Sociology and Political Science 60: 194-205, https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/17
MAZURYK O.V., 2015, Social audit as a modern diagnostic technology: theoretical and methodological principles of research, Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University 1148(34): 107-113.
MELNYK K.P., 2019, Formalization of the subject area of audit in terms of sustainable development, Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis 3(44): 34-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2019-3(44)-34-39
MICHELON G., PATTEN D.M., ROMI A.N., 2019, Creating legitimacy for sustainability assurance practices: evi-dence from sustainability restatements, European Accounting Review 28(2): 395-422, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180. 2018.1469424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1469424
MORIMOTO R., ASH J., HOPE C., 2005, Corporate social responsibility audit: from theory to practice, Journal of Business Ethics,62: 315-325, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5
SAJ, 2007, SAJSA8000 Standard, https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/.
SHERRY B., 2021, More Than Half of S&P Global 1200 Now Disclose Using SASB Standards, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/09/22/2301122/0/en/More-Than-Half-of-S-P-Global-1200-Now-Disclose-Using-SASB-Standards.html.
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, 2022, https://www.sasb.org/.
TAIWAN STOCK EXCHANGE, 2021, Corporation Rules Governing the Preparation and Filing of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports by TWSE Listed Companies, https://cutt.ly/AV3Biio.
UN, 2020, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
VASILIEVA T., LIEONOV S., MAKARENKO I., SIRKOVSKA N., 2017, Sustainability information disclosure as an instrument of marketing communication with stakeholders: markets, social and economic aspects, Marketing and Management of Innovation 4: 350-357, https://doi.org/10.21272/MMI.2017.4-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.4-31
VELTE P., 2021, Archival Research on Integrated Reporting: a Systematic Review of Main Drivers and the Impact of Integrated Reporting on Firm Value, Journal of Management and Governance 26: 997-1061, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w
VOROBEY V., ZHUROVSKA I., 2021, Non-financial reporting: tools of socially responsible business, FOP O.M. Kostyuchenko, Kyiv.
WADDOCK S., SMITH N., 2000, Corporate Responsibility Audits: Doing Well by Doing Good, Sloan Management Review 41(2): 75-83.
YANG Y., ORZES G., JILA F., 2019, Does GRI Sustainability Reporting Pay Off? An Empirical Investigation of Publicly Listed Firms in China, Business & Society 60(7): 1738-1772, https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319831632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319831632
ZEMLYAK N.V., SERPENINOVA Y.S., 2020, Methods of Reporting on Sustainable Development and its Audit, Educational and Scientific Institute of Business Technologies, Sumy.
Article Details
Abstract views: 488
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
