The Function and Perception of Urban Ecosystem Services in the Society
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020)
-
China’s Environmental Protection in the New Era from the Perspective of Eco-civilization Construction
Qingzhi Huan7-14
-
The Function and Perception of Urban Ecosystem Services in the Society
Fredrik Edlund15-23
-
Immigration and Social Aspects of Sustainable Development. The Case of Germany
Paweł Rydzewski25-31
-
Achieving Sustainable Competitive Advantage Through Intellectual Capital and Corporate Character: The Mediating Role of Innovation
Huan Xiao, Dengke Yu33-45
-
Ethics of Sustainable Development from the View of A. Badiou’s Critique of Contemporary Ethics
Andrzej Papuziński47-52
-
Ecological Performance: Ethnic Fragmentation versus Governance Quality and Sustainable Development
Viktor Koziuk, Yuryi Hayda, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, Serhii Kozlovskyi53-64
-
The Theoretical Foundations of Management in Terms of the Implementation of the Process of Globalization and Sustainable Development in the Real Sphere
Franciszek Piontek65-69
-
Does Appearance of the Migrants Change Citizens Perception of the Public Space? Case Study of Disturbed Sustainability, Belgrade, Serbia
Nataša Danilović Hristić, Nebojša Stefanović71-80
-
Consumption and Sustainable Development: Ethical Aspects
Maria Miczyńska-Kowalska81-88
-
The Role of Language in Sustainable Development: Multilingualism and Language Literacy in India
Neha Toppo, Mojibur Rahman89-93
-
Value Theory in the Economics of Sustainable Development
Małgorzata Pink95-102
-
Women’s Attitude Towards Environment Sustainability Through Natural Preservation
Jyoti Kumari, Ajit Kumar Behura, Sarita Kar103-107
-
The Impact of Selected Biotechnology Processes for Sustainable Development of the Environment and Human Life
Aleksandra Badora, Magdalena Celińska109-117
-
Surveys as Means of Understanding User-behaviour with Respect to Energy Usage in Households, Prior to Decision-making to Promote Sustainability
G Venkatesh, Are Kjeang119-134
-
Sustainable Habitat as the Main Factor of Urbanization Development: 19th-20th Centuries
Azizov Aghasalim135-148
-
A Comprehensive Approach: Inclusive, Smart and Green Urban Development
Justyna Przywojska, Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz149-160
-
Corporate Sustainability Practices in Polluting Industries: Evidence from India, China and USA
Prem Sagar Mishra, Ajay Kumar, Niladri Das161-168
-
The Possibility of Using Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L. var. Napus) for Energy Purposes
Jakub Siemek, Jan Macuda, Łukasz Łukańko, Jakub Nowak, Tadeusz Zając167-177
-
Reconsidering Land System Changes in Borderlands: Insights from the China-ASEAN Borderland
Xiaobo Hua, Yasuyuki Kono179-187
-
NER300: Success or Failure of Public Support for Low-emission Technologies?
Grażyna Borys189-196
-
The Identification of the Luhansk Region and the Region Act’s According to the Qualification of Their Sustainable Development in the Conditions of the Joint Forces Operation
Inna Zablodska, Svitlana Hrechana, Daria Zablodska197-210
-
Sustainable Development Goals in Arab Region – United Arab Emirates’ Case Study
Adam Krzymowski211-220
-
Theatre for Sustainable Development: Jana Sanskriti’s Participatory Ideologue and Practice
Shubhra Ghoshal, Nirban Manna221-227
-
Risk and Uncertainty in Sustainable Development: Undertaking Politics of the Climate Change in the United States
Olena Ovchynnikova229-235
Archives
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The urban development that is now taking place globally has led to the most extensive permanent land use that has caused ecosystems to be destroyed and the depletion of natural resources. Today, about 50% of the world’s population lives in urbanized cities and by 2030 it is estimated to be about 70%. The fact that we gather in larger numbers in cities means that we transport large volumes of resources to these areas, which gives rise to waste and emissions, which places a burden on the neighboring environment to the it’s limits. This leads to problems for both human health and society’s economy, which is because the ecosystems that help us, collapse. To counter this, a better urban planning is required which includes the environment in society as ecosystem services. The problem with ecosystem services is that they do not have a commercial value, which makes it difficult to implement since they do not indicate any economic gain. Therefore, it is necessary to increase knowledge about how they contribute so that they can be correlated to how they contribute to society from three aspects: economic, social, environmental.
Keywords:
References
ADEGUN O., 2017, Developing Green Infrastructure in a Johannesburg Informal Settlement: Investigating Residents’ Willingness to Pay, in: Procedia Engineering, 198, p. 176-186.
AGUILAR F. X., OBENG E. A., CAI Z., 2018, Water quality improvements elicit consistent willingness-to-pay for the enhancement of forested watershed ecosystem services, in: Ecosystem Services, 30, p. 158-171.
AMANO T., BUTT I. PEH K. S.-H., 2018, The importance of green spaces to public health: a multi-continental analysis, in: Ecological Applications, 28(6), p. 1473-1480.
ANDERSSON-SKÖLD Y., KLINGBERG J., GUNNARSSON B., CULLINANE K., GUSTAFSSON I., HEDBLOM M., KNEZ I., LINDBERG F., ODE S. Å., PLEIJEL, H., THORSSON P., THORSSON S., 2018, A framework for assessing urban greenery’s effects and valuing its ecosystem services, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 205, p. 274-285.
ARITFUL ISLAM M., AHMAD S.A., ISLAM R., 2018, Estimating Willingness to Pay for Improving River Water Quality Using Contingent Valuation Method: A Conceptual Framework, in: International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics, 5(8), p. 643-657.
BENDPR T. K., SHANDAS V., MILES B., BELT K., OLANDER L., 2018, Ecosystem services and U.S. stormwater planning: An approach for improving urban stormwater decisions, in: Environmental Science and Policy, 88, p. 92-103.
BERLAND A., SHIFLETT S. A., SHUSTER W. D., GARMESTANI A. S., GODDARD H. C., HERRMANN D. L., HOPTON M. E., 2017, The role of trees in urban stormwater management, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 162, p. 167-177.
BISSONNETTE J.-F., DUPRAS J., MESSIER C., LECHOWICZ M., DAGENAIS D., PAQUETTE A., JAEGER J. A. G., GONZALES A., 2018, Moving forward in implementing green infrastructures: Stakeholder perceptions of opportunities and obstacles in a major North American metropolitan area, in: Cities, 81, p. 61-70.
CHEN X., de VRIES S., ASSMUTH T., DICK J., HERMANS T., HERTEL O., JENSEN A., JONES L., KABISCH S., LANKI T., LEHMANN I., MASKELL L., NORTON L., REIS S., 2018, Research challenges for cultural ecosystem services and public health in (peri-)urban environments, in: Science of The Total Environment, 651, p. 2118-2129.
CHIABAI A., QUIROGA S., MARTINEZJUAREZ P., HIGGINS S., TAYLOR T., 2018, The nexus between climate change, ecosystem services and human health: Towards a conceptual framework, in: Science of The Total Environment, 635, p. 1191-1204.
CHIARA C., 2018, Ecosystem services in urban plans: What is there, and what is still needed for better decisions – ScienceDirect.
CZAJKOWSKI J., ENGEL V., MARTINEZ C., MIRCHI A., WATKINS D., SUKOP M. C., HUGHES J. D., 2018, Economic impacts of urban flooding in South Florida: Potential consequences of managing groundwater to prevent salt water intrusion, in: Science of The Total Environment, 621, p. 465-478.
DEMUZERE M., ORRU K., HEIDRICH O., OLAZABAL E., GENELETTI D., ORRU H., BHAVE A. G., MITTAL N., FELIU E., FAEHNLE M., 2014, Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multiscale assessment of green urban infrastructure, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 146. P. 107-115.
DERKZEN M. L., van TEEFFELEN A. J. A., VERBUNG P. H., 2017, Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation: How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences?, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, p. 106-130.
ELMQVIST T., SETÄLÄ H., HANDEL S., van der PLOEG S., ARONSON J., BLIGNAUT J., GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN E., NOWAK D., KRONENBERG J., de GROOT R., 2015, Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas, in: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, p. 101-108.
FELTYNOWSKI M., KRONENBERG J., BERGIER T., KABISCH N., ŁASZKIEWICZ E., STROHBACH M. W., 2018, Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data, in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 31, p. 56-66.
GROSHANS G. R., MIKHAILOVA E. A., POST C. J., SCHLAUTMAN M. A., ZURQANI H. A., ZHANG L., 2018, Assessing the Value of Soil Inorganic Carbon for Ecosystem Services in
the Contiguous United States Based on Liming Replacement Costs, in: Land, 7(4), p. 149.
GUSTAFSSON S., HERMELIN B., SMAS L., 2018, Integrating environmental sustainability into strategic spatial planning: the importance of management, in: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
HEGETSCHWEILER K. T., de VRIES S., ARNBERGER A., BELL S., BRENNAN M., SITER N., OLAFSSON A. S., VOIGHT, A., HUNZIKER M., 2017, Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies, in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 21, p. 48-59.
HUANG L., CAO W., XU X., FAN J., WANG J., 2018, Research article: Linking the benefits of ecosystem services to sustainable spatial planning of ecological conservation strategies, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 222, p. 385-395.
JIANG W., 2017, Ecosystem services research in China: A critical review, in: Ecosystem Services, 26, p. 10-16.
KIM D., JIN J., 2018, Does happiness data say urban parks are worth it?, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, p. 1-11.
LI F., LIU X., ZHANG X., ZHAO D., LIU H., ZHOU C. , WANG R., 2017, Urban ecological infrastructure: an integrated network for ecosystem services and sustainable urban systems, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, p. S12-S18.
LIMA L. S. de KRUEGER T., GARCIA-MARQUEZ, J., 2017, Uncertainties in demonstrating environmental benefits of payments for ecosystem services, in: Ecosystem Services, 27, p. 139-149.
MABON L., SHIH W.-Y., 2018, What might ‘just green enough’ urban development mean in the context of climate change adaptation? The case of urban greenspace planning in Taipei Metropolis, Taiwan, in: World Development, 107, p. 224-238.
di MARINO M., LAPINTIE K., 2018, Exploring the concept of green infrastructure in urban landscape. Experiences from Italy, Canada and Finland, in: Landscape Research, 43(1), p. 139-149.
MEEROW S., NEWELL J. P., 2017, Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, p. 62-75.
MEXIA T., VIEIRA J., PRÍNCIPE A., ANJOS A., SILVA P., LOPES N., FREITAS C., SANTOS-REIS M., CORREIA O., BRANQUINHO C., PINHO P., 2018, Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass, in: Environmental Research, 160, p. 469-478.
NATURVÅRDSVERKET, 2015, Guide för värdering av ekosystemtjänster, Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm.
NATURVÅRDSVERKET, 2019, Vad är ekosystemtjänster?,https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Miljoarbete-i-samhallet/Miljoarbete-iSverige/Uppdelat-efter-omrade/Ekosystemtjanster/Vad-ar-ekosystemtjanster/ (16.01.2019).
NIELSEN-PINCUS M., SUSSMAN P., BENNETT D. E., GOSNELL, H., PARKER R., 2017, The Influence of Place on the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services, in: Society & Natural Resources, 30(12), p. 1423-1441.
NIKODINOSKA N., PALETTO A., PASTORELLA F., GRANVIK M., FRANZESE P. P., 2018, Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: The case of Uppsala (Sweden), in: Ecological Modelling, 368, p. 411-424.
REGERINGSKANSLIET R., 2015, Ekosystem och biologisk mångfald, https://www.regeringen.se/regeringens-politik/globala-malen-ochagenda-2030/ekosystem-och-biologisk-mangfald/ (16.01.2019).
RIECHERS M., BARKMANN J., TSCHARNTKE T., 2018, Diverging perceptions by social groups on cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, p. 161-168.
RODRÍGUEZ-LOINAZ G., PEÑA L., PALACIOS-AGUNDEZ I., AMETZAGA I., ONAINDIA M., 2018, Identifying Green Infrastructure as a Basis for an Incentive Mechanism at the Municipality Level in Biscay (Basque Country), in: Forests, 9(1), p. 22.
ROEBELING P., SARAIVA M., PALLA A., GNECCO I., TEOTÓNIO C., FIDELIS T., MARTINS F., ALVES H., ROCHA J., 2017, Assessing the socio-economic impacts of green/blue space, urban residential and road infrastructure projects in the Confluence (Lyon): a hedonic pricing simulation approach, in: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(3), p. 482-499.
SHACKLETON R. T., ANGELSTAM P., van der WAAL B., ELBAKIDZE M., 2017, Progress made in managing and valuing ecosystem services: a horizon scan of gaps in research,
management and governance, in: Ecosystem Services, 27, p. 232-241.
SILVENNOINEN S., TAKA M., YLI-PELKONEN V., KOIVUSALO H., OLLIKAINEN M., SETÄLÄ H., 2017, Monetary value of urban green space as an ecosystem service provider: A
case study of urban runoff management in Finland, in: Ecosystem Services, 28, p. 17-27.
SIRAKAYA A., CLIQUET A., HARRIS J., 2018, Ecosystem services in cities: Towards the international legal protection of ecosystem services in urban environments, in: Ecosystem Services, 29, p. 205-212.
VALLECILLO S., LA NOTTE A., ZULIAN G., FERRINI S., MAES J., 2019, Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people, in: Ecological Modelling, 392, p. 196-211.
VALLECILLO S., POLCE C., BARBOSA A., PERPIÑA CASTILLO C., VANDECASTEELE I., RUSCH G. M., MAES J., 2018, Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 174, p. 41-54.
VARIS O., KESKINEN M., KUMMU M., 2017, Four dimensions of water security with a case of the indirect role of water in global food security, in: Water Security, 1, p. 36-45.
WANG J., BANZHAF E., 2018, Towards a better understanding of Green Infrastructure: A critical review, in: Ecological Indicators, 85, p. 758-772.
WANG Y., LI X., SUN M., YU H., 2018, Managing urban ecological land as properties: Conceptual model, public perceptions, and willingness to pay, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133, p. 21-29.
WANG Y.-C., SHEN J.-K., XIANG W.-N., 2018, Ecosystem service of green infrastructure for adaptation to urban growth: function and configuration, in: Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4(5), p. 132-143.
Wei, J., Qian, J., Tao, Y., Hu, F. & Ou, W. (2018). Evaluating Spatial Priority of Urban Green Infrastructure for Urban Sustainability in Areas of Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of
Pukou in China, in: Sustainability, 10(2) , 327.
WILKERSON M. L., MITCHELL M. G. E., SHANAHAN D., WILSON K. A., IVES C. D., LOVELOCK C. E., RHODES J. R., 2018, The role of socio-economic factors in planning and managing urban ecosystem services, in: Ecosystem Services, 31(Part A), p. 102-110.
XIAO Y., LU Y., GUO Y., YUAN Y., 2017, Estimating the willingness to pay for green space services in Shanghai: Implications for social equity in urban China, in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 26, p. 95-103.
ZINIA N. J., MCSHANE P., 2018, Ecosystem services management: An evaluation of green adaptations for urban development in Dhaka, Bangladesh, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 173, p. 23-32.
Article Details
Abstract views: 269
Downloads: 149
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
