From Environmental Ethics to Sustainability Ethics
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)
-
The Journal Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development as a Polish Platform for International Interdisciplinary Scientific Discourse
Artur Pawłowski1-5
-
From Environmental Ethics to Sustainability Ethics
Hong Du6-14
-
The Role of Christianity in Ecological Awakening: Foundations for Christians' Sustainable Behavior Toward Nature
Ryszard Sadowski15-24
-
Gandhian Interpretation of the Bhagavad Gita: A Solution to Sustainable Living
Namarta Sharma25-33
-
Values Orientation Change – an Important Prerequisite for the Development of a Sustainable Economy
Eva Pechociakova Svitacova34-42
-
Assessing Sustainable Development Performance and Alternative Concepts in a Group of Developed Countries in Europe
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser43-73
-
Resilience after COVID-19: A Global Review of Recovery Strategies and their impact on Demographic and Economic Sectors
Jhoana Romero, Monica Mesa, Cesar Minoli, Juan Aristizabal74-95
-
Digital Inequality and Sustainable Development
Pawel Rydzewski96-108
-
Digital Trade and Regional Economic Resilience: A Case Study from China
Paijie Wan, Feng He109-128
-
Examining the Relationship between Globalization and Sustainable Migration in OECD Countries
Mehmet Şükrü Nar, Mehmet Nar129-142
-
Estimating the Role of Economic Globalization, Technological Development and Household Consumption on Ecological Footprint in Visegrad Countries
Orhan Cengiz, Fatma İdil Baktemur, Meltem Canoglu143-158
-
Relationship Between Organic Farmland Expansion and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Ivan Zayukov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, Oleksandr Tregubov, Sviatoslav Storchak, Viktor Mishchenko, Ruslan Lavrov159-173
-
Spatiotemporal Distribution of the Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on NDVI in China
Shuyi Dong, Wen Zhuang, Shuting Zhang, Shanshan Xie174-189
-
How Economic and Monetary Policy Uncertainty Affect Climate Policy Uncertainty in the United States?
Ahmet Tayfur Akcan, Muhammad Shahbaz, Cuneyt Kılıç, Hasan Kazak190-207
-
A Framework for Modeling the Decarbonization of the Economy Based on Energy Innovations in the Context of Industry 5.0 and Sustainable Development: International Perspective
Maryna Kravchenko, Kateryna Kopishynska, Olena Trofymenko, Ivan Pyshnograiev, Kateryna Boiarynova207-220
-
Assessing the Level of Energy Security of China: Evidence from TOPSIS-entropy Weight Method
Li Pan221-235
-
Sustainable Development through Geothermal Energy: Findings from Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France
Ignas Mikalauskas, Gabija Stanislovaitytė236-244
-
Impact of Climate Change on Women’s Political Empowerment: The Sustainable Development Perspective
Chun-Ling Ding, Yan Ma, Guo-Hua Ni, Chun-Ping Chang245-260
-
Women's Leadership in Accelerating Sustainable Development : Care Based Approach for Transformative Change
Purnima Lenka, Diptiranjan Khatua261-270
-
Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in SAARC Countries
Jai Kumar, Chen Xi, Joti Kumari, Jinyan Huang271-287
-
Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Asia: The Role of Political Institutions and Natural Resources
Li Guo, Romanus Osabohien, Armand Fréjuis Akpa Akpa, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan288-309
-
Impact of Multidimensional Distance on Financial Cooperation: A Case Study of China and Neighboring Countries
Fuchang Li, Han Wang, Xiaohui Hu, Wenli Ding310-328
Archives
-
Vol. 21 No. 2
2026-07-01 24
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2026-01-10 21
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-07-10 19
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
Contemporary environmental ethics is confronted with a dual dilemma, namely the tension between theoretical and practical considerations. In response, scholars have pursued a variety of avenues, with the practice-oriented approach emerging as the dominant trend. The practice of environmental ethics can be analyzed according to two paradigms: the applied ethics paradigm and the practical ethics paradigm. Both paradigms suggest the possibility of a certain kind of sustainability ethics, namely the development of traditional environmental ethics into a public, applied sustainability ethics. In other words, the advancement of traditional environmental ethics, which is theoretically superior, into a form of public and applied sustainability ethics may prove an effective means of addressing the current challenges facing environmental ethics.
Keywords:
References
1. ATTFIELD R., 1983, The ethics of environmental concern, Columbia University Press, New York.
2. BAILEY J.S., 2021, Practical vs theoretical ethics: A response to Cox, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 54(1): 192-196.
3. BIASETTI P., DE MORI B., 2020, Towards a Conservation Ethics, Iride-Filosofia E Discussione Pubblica 33(3): 471-486.
4. BLACKSTONEW.T., 1974, Philosophy and Environmental Crisis, The University of Georgia Press, Athens.
5. BROWN D.A., 2009, The importance of creating an applied environmental ethics: lessons learned from climate change, Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy, ed. Minteer B., Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
6. BUA A., 2017, Scale and Policy Impact in Participatory-Deliberative Democracy: Lessons From A Multi-Level Process, Public Administration 95(1): 160-177.
7. BUCK S., 1997, Forum on the role of environmental ethics in restructuring environmental policy and law for the next century, Policy Currents 7: 1-13.
8. CALLICOTT J.B., FRODEMAN R., 2009, Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy, Macmillan Reference USA.
9. CALLICOTT J.B., 1989, In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy, SUNY Press.
10. CORNER A., MARKOWITZ E., PIDGEON N., 2014, Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change 5(3): 411-422.
11. COSTANZA R., DE GROOT R., BRAAT L., KUBISZEWSKI I., FIORAMONTI L., SUTTON P., FARBER S., GRASSO M., 2017, Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?, Ecosystem Services 28: 1-16.
12. DICKINSON J.L., SHIRK J., BONTER D., BONNEY R., CRAIN R.L., MARTIN J., PHILLIPS T., PURCELL K., 2012, The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement, Frontiers in Ecology And The Environment 10(6): 291-297.
13. FABINYI M., EVANS L., FOALE S.J., 2014, Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology, Ecology and Society 19(4).
14. FINARDI C., PELLEGRINI G., ROWE G., 2012, Food safety issues: From Enlightened Elitism towards Deliberative Democracy? An overview of EFSA's ‘Public Consultation’ instrument, Food Policy 37(4): 427-438.
15. FRASER D., 2012, A ‘Practical" Ethic for Animals’, Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 25(5): 721-746.
16. FRODEMAN R., JAMIESON D., CALLICOTT J.B., GARDINER S.M., GRUEN L., KLAVER I.J., HARGROVE E., MINTEER B.A., NORTON B., PALMER C., ROLSTON H. III, ROZZI R., STERBA J.P., THROOP W.M. and DAVION V., 2007, Commentary on the Future of Environmental Philosophy, Ethics and the Environment 12(2): 117-150.
17. ARGROVE, E.C., 1989, Foundations of Environmental Ethics, Prentice Hall.
18. HEAD B.W., ALFORD J., 2015, Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management, Administration & Society 47(6): 711-739.
19. HEATH J., 2022, The Failure of Traditional Environmental Philosophy, Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal And Political Philosophy 28(1): 1-16.
20. HOURDEQUIN M., 2012, Comments on A New Environmental Ethics: The Next Millennium for Life on Earth, Expositions 6(1): 11-18.
21. IRWIN R., 2007, The neoliberal state, Environmental Pragmatism, and its discontents, Environmental Politics 16(4): 643-658.
22. LENTON T., ROCKSTR M. J., GAFFNEY O., RAHMSTORF S., RICHARDSON K., STEFFEN W., SCHELLNHUBER H., 2019, Climate tipping points – too risky to bet against, Nature 575: 592-595.
23. LIGHT A., 2002, Contemporary Environmental Ethics From Metaethics to Public Philosophy, Metaphilosophy 33(4):426-449.
24. MILLER T.R., MINTEER B.A., MALAN L.-C., 2011, The new conservation debate: The view from practical ethics, Biological Conservation 144(3): 948-957.
25. MINTEER, B.A. and COLLINS, J.P., 2005, Why We Need an ‘Ecological Ethics’, Frontiers in Ecology And The Environment 3(6): 332-337.
26. MINTEER, B.A. and COLLINS, J.P., 2008, From Environmental to Ecological Ethics: Toward a Practical Ethics for Ecologists and Conservationists, Science and Engineering Ethics 14(4): 483-501.
27. MINTEER B.A., 2012, Refounding environmental ethics, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
28. NAESS A., 1973, The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary, Inquiry, 16: 95-100.
29. NILES M.T., LUBELL M., 2012, Integrative Frontiers in Environmental Policy Theory and Research, Policy Studies Journal 40: 41-64.
30. NORTON B.G., 1988, Why Preserve Natural Diversity? Princeton University Press, Princeton.
31. NORTON B.G., 2003, Searching for sustainability: interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology, Cambridge University Press.
32. NORTON B.G., 2005, Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management, University of Chicago Press.
33. OUYANG J., ZHANG K.Z., WEN B., LU Y.P., 2020, Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Environmental Governance in China: Evidence from the River Chief System (RCS), International Journal of Environmental Research And Public Health 17(19).
34. PASSMORE, J.A., 1974, Man's Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions, Gerald Duck-worth & Co. Ltd.
35. PAUL K.B., 2017, Introducing Interpretive Approach of Phenomenological Research Methodology in Environmental Philosophy: A Mode of Engaged Philosophy in the Anthropocene, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 1-10.
36. RAMIEL H., LEFSTEIN A., 2022, 'Bottom-up governance': discourse, practices and the duality of the state, Cambridge Journal of Education 52(2): 217-233.
37. REGAN T., 1982, The Case for Animal Rights, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
38. ROCKSTR M, J., GUPTA J., QIN D., LADE S.J., ABRAMS J.F., ANDERSEN L.S., ARMSTRONG MCKAY D.I., BAI X., BALA G., BUNN S.E., CIOBANU D., DECLERCK F., EBI K., GIFFORD L., GORDON C., HASAN S., KANIE N., LENTON T.M., LORIANI S., LIVERMAN D.M., MOHAMED A., NAKICENOVIC N., OBURA D., OSPINA D., PRODANI K., RAMMELT C., SAKSCHEWSKI B., SCHOLTENS J., STEWART-KOSTER B., THA-RAMMAL T., VAN VUUREN D., VERBURG P.H., WINKELMANN R., ZIMM C., BENNETT E.M., BRINGEZU S., BROADGATE W., GREEN P.A., HUANG L., JACOBSON L., NDEHEDEHE C., PEDDE S., ROCHA J., SCHEFFER M., SCHULTE-UEBBING L., DE VRIES W., XIAO C., XU C., XU X., ZAFRA-CALVO N., ZHANG X., 2023, Safe and just Earth system boundaries, Nature 619: 102-111.
39. ROLSTON H. Ⅲ., 1975, Is There an Ecological Ethic? Ethics, 85: 93-109.
40. ROLSTON H. Ⅲ., 1986, Philosophy Gone Wild: Essays in Environmental Ethics, Prometheus Books, Buffalo.
41. ROZMARYNOWSKA K., 2015, The Ethical Dimension of Practical Wisdom, Organon F 22(1): 34-52.
42. ROZZI R., 2007, Future environmental philosophies and their biocultural conservation interfaces, Ethics and the Environment 12(2): 142-145.
43. ROZZI R., ARMESTO J.J., GUTI RREZ J.R., MASSARDO F., LIKENS G.E., ANDERSON C.B., POOLE A., MO-SES K.P., HARGROVE E., MANSILLA A.O., KENNEDY J.H., WILLSON M., JAX K., JONES C.G., CALLICOTT J.B., ARROYO M.T.K., 2012, Integrating Ecology and Environmental Ethics: Earth Stewardship in the Southern End of the Americas, BioScience 62(3): 226-236.
44. SAGOFF M., 2008, The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment, Cambridge University Press.
45. SARKAR I., BEHURA A., 2018, Bioregionalism: Practical Environmental Ethics with an Underlying Pragmatic Ideal, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 13(2): 177-184.
46. SARKAR S., 2005, Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, New York.
47. SHIRK J.L., BALLARD H.L., WILDERMAN C.C., PHILLIPS T., WIGGINS A., JORDAN R., MCCALLIE E., MINARCHEK M., LEWENSTEIN B.V., KRASNY M.E., BONNEY R., 2012,Public Participation in Scientific Re-search: a Framework for Deliberate Design, Ecology and Society 17(2): 29.
48. SINGER P., 1975, Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals, New York Review/Random House, New York.
49. SORGEN J., 2020, Beyond the Anthropocentrism Debate: An Adaptive History of Environmental Ethics, Environmental Ethics 42(2): 103-118.
50. STEFFEN W., ROCKSTR M. J., RICHARDSON K., LENTON T.M., FOLKE C., LIVERMAN D.M., SUMMER-HAYES C., BARNOSKY A.D., CORNELL S.E., CRUCIFIX M.C., DONGES J.F., FETZER I., LADE S.J., SCHEFFER M., WINKELMANN R., SCHELLNHUBERH.J., 2018, Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115: 8252-8259.
51. STEINBOCK B., 2013, How has Philosophical Applied Ethics Progressed in the Past Fifty Years? Metaphilosophy 44: 58-62.
52. SULLIVAN L.S., 2024, Comparative Philosophy and Practical Applied Ethics, Journal Of Chinese Philosophy 51(1): 44-53.
53. SWIM J.K., STERN P.C., DOHERTY T.J., CLAYTON S., RESER J.P., WEBER E.U., GIFFORD R., HOWARD G.S., 2011, Psychology's Contributions to Understanding and Addressing Global Climate Change, American Psycholo-gist 66(4): 241-250.
54. SYLVAN R.R., 1973, Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental Ethic, Proceedings of the Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy, Sofia Press, Varna, Bulgaria, 205-210.
55. TAYLOR P., 1986, Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics, Princeton University Press.
56. THOMPSON P.B., HILDE T.C., 2000, The agrarian roots of pragmatism, Vanderbilt University Press.
57. THOMPSON P.B., 2001, The Reshaping of Conventional Farming: A North American Perspective, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14(2): 217-229.
58. UNEP, 2019, Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People, Cambridge University Press.
59. WHITE L.T., 1967, The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis, Science 155: 1203-1207.
Article Details
Abstract views: 809
Downloads: 273

