Digital Inequality and Sustainable Development

Pawel Rydzewski

doi:10.35784/preko.6691

PDF (angielski)

Opublikowane: 2025-01-10

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6691

Numer Tom 20 Nr 1 (2025)

Articles

Czasopismo Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development jako polska platforma dla międzynarodowego interdyscyplinarnego dyskursu naukowego
Artur Pawłowski

1-5
Od etyki środowiskowej do etyki zrównoważonego rozwoju
Hong Du

6-14
Rola chrześcijaństwa w przebudzeniu ekologicznym: podstawy zrównoważonego zachowania chrześcijan wobec przyrody
Ryszard Sadowski

15-24
Gandhijska interpretacja Bhagavad Gity: rozwiązanie dla zrównoważonego życia
Namarta Sharma

25-33
Nowe podejście do wartości – ważny warunek rozwoju zrównoważonej gospodarki
Eva Pechociakova Svitacova

34-42
Ocena realizacji zrównoważonego rozwoju i alternatywnych koncepcji w grupie krajów rozwiniętych w Europie
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser

43-73
Resilencja po COVID-19: globalny przegląd strategii odbudowy i ich wpływu na sektory demograficzne i gospodarcze
Jhoana Romero, Monica Mesa, Cesar Minoli, Juan Aristizabal

74-95
Nierówności cyfrowe i rozwój zrównoważony
Paweł Rydzewski

96-108
Handel cyfrowy i regionalna odporność gospodarcza: studium przypadku z Chin
Paijie Wan, Feng He

109-128
Badanie związku między globalizacją a zrównoważonością migracji w krajach OECD
Mehmet Şükrü Nar, Mehmet Nar

129-142
Oszacowanie roli globalizacji, rozwoju technologicznego i poziomu konsumpcji gospodarstw domowych na ślad ekologiczny w krajach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej
Orhan Cengiz, Fatma İdil Baktemur, Meltem Canoglu

143-158
Związek pomiędzy ekspansją ekologicznych gruntów rolnych a emisją gazów cieplarnianych w Europie w kontekście wdrażania Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Ivan Zayukov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, Oleksandr Tregubov, Sviatoslav Storchak, Viktor Mishchenko, Ruslan Lavrov

159-173
Czasoprzestrzenny rozkład wpływu zmian klimatycznych i działalności człowieka na NDVI w Chinach
Shuyi Dong, Wen Zhuang, Shuting Zhang, Shanshan Xie

174-189
Jak niepewność polityki gospodarczej i monetarnej wpływa na przewidywalność polityki klimatycznej w Stanach Zjednoczonych?
Ahmet Tayfur Akcan, Muhammad Shahbaz, Cuneyt Kılıç, Hasan Kazak

190-207
Ramy modelowania dekarbonizacji gospodarki w oparciu o innowacje energetyczne w kontekście Przemysłu 5.0 i zrównoważonego rozwoju: perspektywa międzynarodowa
Maryna Kravchenko, Kateryna Kopishynska, Olena Trofymenko, Ivan Pyshnograiev, Kateryna Boiarynova

207-220
Ocena poziomu bezpieczeństwa energetycznego Chin: dowody z metody wagowej entropii TOPSIS
Li Pan

221-235
Zrównoważony rozwój w kontekście energii geotermalnej: przykład Niemiec, Włoch, Turcji, Islandii i Francji
Ignas Mikalauskas, Gabija Stanislovaitytė

236-244
Wpływ zmian klimatycznych na wzmocnienie pozycji politycznej kobiet: perspektywa zrównoważonego rozwoju
Chun-Ling Ding, Yan Ma, Guo-Hua Ni, Chun-Ping Chang

245-260
Przywództwo kobiet wsparciem dla zrównoważonego rozwoju: etyka opieki w czasie transformacji
Purnima Lenka, Diptiranjan Khatua

261-270
Makroekonomiczne i instytucjonalne czynniki determinujące zagraniczne inwestycje bezpośrednie w krajach SAARC
Jai Kumar, Chen Xi, Joti Kumari, Jinyan Huang

271-287
Wzrost gospodarczy i zrównoważony rozwój w Azji: rola instytucji politycznych i zasobów naturalnych
Li Guo, Romanus Osabohien, Armand Fréjuis Akpa Akpa, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan

288-309
Wpływ wielowymiarowej odległości na współpracę finansową: studium przypadku Chin i krajów sąsiednich
Fuchang Li, Han Wang, Xiaohui Hu, Wenli Ding

310-328

Archiwum

2026

Tom 21 Nr 2
2026-07-01 24
Tom 21 Nr 1
2026-01-10 21

2025

Tom 20 Nr 2
2025-07-10 19
Tom 20 Nr 1
2025-01-10 22

2024

Tom 19 Nr 2
2024-07-01 24
Tom 19 Nr 1
2024-01-08 27

2023

Tom 18 Nr 2
2023-07-10 25
Tom 18 Nr 1
2023-01-01 25

2021

Tom 16 Nr 2
2021-07-01 26
Tom 16 Nr 1
2021-01-04 24

Authors

Paweł Rydzewski

p.rydzewski@me.com

Instytut Socjologii, Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, Polska

Polska

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8144-6340

Abstrakt

Nierówności cyfrowe stanowią krytyczne wyzwanie w dążeniu do zrównoważonego rozwoju, ponieważ dysproporcje w dostępie do technologii cyfrowych i biegłości w ich używaniu utrudniają sprawiedliwy wzrost, inkluzję społeczną i zrównoważony rozwój środowiskowy. W tym artykule zbadano wieloaspektowy związek między nierównościami cyfrowymi a zrównoważonym rozwojem, podkreślając, w jaki sposób nierówny dostęp do technologii informacyjno-komunikacyjnych (ICT) wpływa na możliwości ekonomiczne, wyniki edukacyjne, dostęp do opieki zdrowotnej i ochronę środowiska. Podkreśla się, że nierówności cyfrowe często odzwierciedlają i pogłębiają istniejące nierówności społeczno-ekonomiczne, w szczególności dotykając zmarginalizowane grupy ze względu na dochód, wykształcenie, wiek i lokalizację geograficzną. Analiza pokazuje, że zajęcie się nierównościami cyfrowymi jest niezbędne do uwolnienia pełnego potencjału technologii cyfrowych w celu przyczynienia się do celów zrównoważonego rozwoju.

Słowa kluczowe:

nierówności cyfrowe, rozwój zrównoważony, inkluzja cyfrowa, równowaga środowiskowa

Bibliografia

1. AKER J.C., MBITI I.M., 2010, Mobile Phones and Economic Development in Africa, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(3): 207-232, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.3.207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.3.207

2. ALLEN T.D., GOLDEN T.D., SHOCKLEY K.M., 2015, How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings, Psychological Science in the Public Interest 16(2): 40-68, https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273

3. ALLWINKLE S., CRUICKSHANK P., 2011, Creating smart-er cities: An overview, Journal of Urban Technology 18(2): 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601103

4. BATES D.W., SARIA S., OHNO-MACHADO L., SHAH A., ESCOBAR G., 2018, Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients, Health Affairs 33(7): 1123-1131, https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0041

5. BONNEY R., BALLARD H., JORDAN R., MCCALLIE E., PHILLIPS T., SHIRK J., WILDERMAN C.C., 2014, Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report, Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington D.C.

6. BRYNJOLFSSON E., MCAFEE A., 2014, The Second Machine Age: Work Progress and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, USA.

7. BÜCHI M., JUST N., LATZER M., 2016, Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five-country study of social differences in Internet use, New Media & Society 18(11): 2087-2106, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816651976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604154

8. CEDEFOP, 2018, Skill Mismatch: Measurement Issues and Consequences for Policymaking, Publications Office of the European Union.

9. COLLINS A., HALVERSON R., 2018, Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America, Teachers College Press, New York, USA.

10. CONRAD C.C., HILCHEY K.G., 2011, A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176(1-4): 273-291, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5

11. CORREA T., 2016, Digital skills and social media use: How Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’, Information Communication & Society 19(8): 1095-1107, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1173707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023

12. CZERNIH N., FALCK O., KRETSCHMER T., WOESSMANN L., 2011, Broadband Infrastructure and Economic Growth, The Economic Journal 121(552): 505-532, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02420.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02420.x

13. DEMIRGUC-KUNT A., KLAPPER L., SINGER D., ANSAR S., HESS J., 2018, The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution, World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1259-0

14. DIMAGGIO P., HARGITTAI E., 2001, From the ‘Digital Divide’ to ‘Digital Inequality’: Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases, Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies.

15. DIMAGGIO P., HARGITTAI E., CELESTE C., SHAFER S., 2004, Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use, Social Inequality, ed. Neckerman E., Russell Sage Foundation, New York, USA: 355-400.

16. DORN E., HANCOCK B., SARAKATSANNIS J., VIRULEG E., 2020, COVID-19 and learning loss – disparities grow and students need help, McKinsey & Company.

17. ERTMER P.A., OTTENBREIT-LEFTWICH A.T., 2010, Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect, Journal of Research on Technology in Education 42(3): 255-284, https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

18. EUBANKS V., 2018, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor, St. Martin's Press, New York, USA.

19. EYNON R., GENIETS A., 2016, The digital skills paradox: How do digitally excluded youth develop skills to use the Internet?, Learning Media and Technology 41(3): 463-479, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845

20. FAGGIO G., OVERMAN H.G., 2014, The effect of public sector employment on local labour markets, Journal of Urban Economics 79: 91-107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2013.03.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2013.05.002

21. FARUQUI A., HARRIS D., HLEDIK R., 2010, Unlocking the €53 billion savings from smart meters in the EU: How increasing the adoption of dynamic tariffs could make or break the EU’s smart grid investment, Energy Policy 38(10): 6222-6231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.010

22. FISCHER S.H., DAVID D., CROTTY B.H., DIERKS M., SAFRAN C., 2014, Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders, International Journal of Medical Informatics 83(9): 624-635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.005

23. FISHER H., VANDERLIP E.R., LIEBERMAN A., 2020, Using telehealth to improve health care access in rural areas, Health Affairs Blog, https://doi.org/10.1377/hblog20200429.580905.

24. FORMAN C., GOLDFARB A., GREENSTEIN S., 2012, The Internet and Local Wages: A Puzzle, American Economic Review 102(1): 556-575, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.556

25. FREE C., PHILLIPS G., WATSON L., GALLI L., FELIX L., EDWARDS P., PATEL V., HAINES A., 2013, The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review, PLOS Medicine 10(1): e1001362, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362

26. FRIEMEL T.N., 2016, The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors, New Media & Society 18(2): 313-331, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814544005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648

27. GALLARDO-ECHENIQUE E.E., DE OLIVEIRA J.M., MARQUÉS-MOLÍAS L., ESTEVE-MON F., 2015, Digital Competence in the Knowledge Society, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 11(1): 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2196

28. GOMEZ-BARROSO, J. L., MARBÁN-FLORES, R., PEREZ-MARTINEZ, J. (2020). Broadband and local economic development: Evidence from Brazil. Telecommunications Policy, 44(3), 101874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101905

29. HÄMÄLÄINEN R., DE WEVER B., NISSINEN K., CINCINNATO S., 2017, What Makes the Difference – PIAAC as a Resource for Understanding the Problem-Solving Skills of Europe's Higher-Education Adults, Computers & Education 113: 120-129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.013

30. HARGITTAI E., 2002, Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills, First Monday 7(4), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942

31. HARGITTAI E., 2008, The Digital Reproduction of Inequality, Social Stratification, ed. Grusky D., Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA: 936-944.

32. HARGITTAI E., 2010, Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the ‘Net Generation’. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x

33. HARGITTAI E., SHAW A., 2013, Digitally savvy citizenship: The role of internet skills in democratic engagement. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(4), 1-22, https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2013.843360.

34. HELSPER E.J., 2012, A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links Between Social and Digital Exclusion, Communication Theory 22(4): 403-426, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x.

35. HELSPER E.J., EYNON R., 2010, Digital natives: Where is the evidence?, British Educational Research Journal 36(3): 503-520, https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227

36. HELSPER, E. J., 2012, A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x

37. HILBERT M., 2011, Digital Gender Divide or Technologically Empowered Women in Developing Countries? A Typical Case of Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics, Women's Studies International Forum 34(6): 479-489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001

38. HILL R., BETTS L.R., GARDNER S.E., 2008, Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion, Computers in Human Behavior 84: 271-280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.003

39. HOWELL B., GRIMES A., 2010, Productivity questions for public investment in broadband infrastructure: A New Zealand perspective, The Journal of Transport and Land Use 3(1) 115-135, https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v3i1.137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v3i1.137

40. HUNSAKER A., HARGITTAI E., 2018, A review of Internet use among older adults, New Media & Society 20(10): 3937-3954, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348

41. INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION (ILO), 2020, Global Employment Trends for Youth 2020: Technology and the Future of Jobs, International Labour Office.

42. JACK W., SURI T., 2011, Mobile money: The economics of M-PESA. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 16721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w16721

43. KATZ R.L., GONZALEZ J., 2016, Bridging the Digital Divide: Broadband as a Catalyst of Economic Growth and Social Progress in Latin America and the Caribbean, The Journal of Development Studies 52(5): 641-660, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1134778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1134778

44. KRAMERS A., HÖJER M., LÖVEHAGEN N., WANGEL J., 2014, Smart sustainable cities–Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities, Environmental Modelling & Software 56: 52-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.019

45. KRUPINSKI E.A., WEINSTEIN R.S., 2013, Telemedicine, telehealth and m-health: new frontiers in medical practice, Annual Review of Public Health 35: 467-477, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182947.

46. LI S., DA XU L., ZHAO S., 2016, The Internet of Things: A Survey, Information Systems Frontiers 17(2): 243-259, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9492-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9492-7

47. LING R., 2012, Taken for Grantedness: The Embedding of Mobile Communication into Society, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8445.001.0001

48. LIVINGSTONE S., HELSPER E.J., 2007, Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide, New Media & Society 9(4): 671-696, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335

49. LUPTON D., 2014, Health promotion in the digital era: a critical commentary, Health Promotion International 30(1): 174-183, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau091

50. MEANS B., BAKIA M., MURPHY R., 2014, Learning Online: What Research Tells Us about Whether, When, and How, Routledge, New York, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095959

51. MORRIS A., 2007, E-literacy and the grey digital divide: A review with recommendations, Journal of Information Literacy 1(3): 13-28, https://doi.org/10.11645/1.3.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11645/1.3.14

52. MOSSBERGER K., TOLBERT C.J., STANSBURY M., 2003, Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C., USA.

53. MOSSBERGER K., TOLBERT C. J., STANSBURY M., 2013, Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Georgetown University Press.

54. NAMBISAN S., WRIGHT M., FELDMAN M., 2017, The Digital Transformation of Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Progress, Challenges, and Key Themes, Research Policy 48(8): 1037-1041, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018

55. NORMAN C.D., SKINNER H.A., 2006, eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world, Journal of Medical Internet Research 8(2): e9, https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9

56. NORRIS P., 2001, Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164887

57. NOURI S., KHOONG E.C., LYLES C.R., KARLINER L., 2020, Addressing equity in telemedicine for chronic disease management during the COVID-19 pandemic, NEJM Catalyst, https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.20.0123.

58. OECD, 2015, Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, OECD Publishing, Paris, France.

59. OECD, 2019, Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future, OECD Publishing, Paris, France.

60. PASSEY D., SIMIN M., ELWELL M., 2018, Digital agency: Empowering equity in and through education, Education and Information Technologies 23(6): 3203-3220, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9750-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9384-x

61. PETTORELLI N., SAFI K., TURNER W., 2014, Satellite remote sensing, biodiversity research and conservation of the future, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1643): 20130190, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0190

62. PRIEGER J.E., 2013, The Broadband Digital Divide and the Economic Benefits of Mobile Broadband for Rural Areas, Telecommunications Policy 37(6-7): 483-502, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.11.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.11.003

63. QIANG C.Z.W., ROSSOTTO C.M., KIMURA K., 2009, Economic Impacts of Broadband, Information and Communications for Development 2009: Extending Reach and Increasing Impact, World Bank.

64. RAGNEDDA M., MUSCHERT G.W., 2013, The Digital Divide: The Internet and Social Inequality in International Perspective, Routledge, New York, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069769

65. RAINIE L., WELLMAN B., 2012, Networked: The New Social Operating System, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8358.001.0001

66. REDDICK C.G., ENRIQUEZ R., HARRIS R.J., SHARMA B., 2020, Determinants of broadband access and affordability: An analysis of a community survey on the digital divide, Cities 106: 102904, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102904

67. REDECKER C., PUNIE Y., 2017, European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu, Publications Office of the European Union.

68. ROBINSON L., COTTLE M., HARGITTAI E., 2015, Digital Inequalities and Why They Matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569-582, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532

69. SCHEERDER A., VAN DEURSEN A., VAN DIJK J., 2017, Determinants of Internet skills, uses, and outcomes, Telecommunications Policy 41(5): 454-465, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.01.003

70. SELWYN N., 2004, Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide, New Media & Society 6(3): 341-362, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519

71. SELWYN N., 2016, Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates, Bloomsbury Publishing, London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952

72. SELWYN, N. (2010). Schools and Schooling in the Digital Age: A Critical Analysis. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840795

73. SURI T., JACK W., 2016. The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science, 354(6317), 1288-1292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5309

74. THOMAS J., BARRAKET J., EWING S., MACDONALD T., MUNROE H., 2020, Measuring Australia’s digital divide: The Australian digital inclusion index 2020, RMIT University and Swinburne University of Technology, 1-56, https://doi.org/10.25916/5f7e9400b89ea.

75. TURNER W., SPECTOR S., GARDINER N., FLADELAND M., STERLING E., STEININGER M., 2015, Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30(7): 418-428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.04.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.04.007

76. UNGOR V.C., SAHIN D., KOCAK T., ERGUT S., BUCCELLA C., CECATO C., HANCKE G.P., 2012, Smart grid technologies: Communication technologies and standards, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 7(4): 529-539, https://doi.org/10.110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2011.2166794

77. VAN DEURSEN A.J.A.M., HELSPER E.J., 2015, The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society, ed. Van Dijk J., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002

78. VAN DEURSEN A.J.A.M., VAN DIJK J.A.G.M., PETERS O., 2011, Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related internet skills, Poetics 39(2): 125-144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.001

79. VAN DIJK J., 2005, The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812

80. VAN DIJK J., 2020, The digital divide in Europe, The Digital Divide: The Internet and Social Inequality in International Perspective, eds Ragnedda M., Muschert G.W., Routledge, New York, USA: 57-77.

81. VAN LAAR E., VAN DEURSEN A.J.A.M., VAN DIJK J.A.G.M., DE HAAN J., 2020, Measuring the levels of 21st-century digital skills among professionals working within the creative industries, First Monday 25(10), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i10.10879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101434

82. VERMESAN O., FRIESS P., 2014, Internet of Things: Converging Technologies for Smart Environments and Integrated Ecosystems, River Publishers, Aalborg, Denmark.

83. WANG S., LIU X., ZHANG L., WANG L., 2017, Air quality forecasting using a deep learning model based on 1D convnets and bidirectional GRU, Scientific Reports 7(1): 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06672-2.

84. WARSCHAUER M., 2004, Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001

85. WEI K.K., 2017, Exploring the Digital Divide: Internet Adoption in Singapore, Business Information Technology Management: Alternative and Adaptive Futures, eds Hackney R., Dunn D., Routledge, New York, USA: 88-102.

86. WELLMAN B., HAYTHORNTHWAITE C., 2002, The internet in everyday life. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774298

87. WORLD BANK, 2020, World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains, World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

88. ZHANG, Y., WU, Y., LIU, H., 2017, Smart Homes and Energy Efficiency: How Digitalization Changes Energy Consumption Patterns. Energy Efficiency, 10(2), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9474-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9474-3

89. ZHOU K., FU C., YANG S., 2016, Big data driven smart energy management: From big data to big insights, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 56: 215-225, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.050

90. ZILLIEN N., HARGITTAI E., 2009, Digital distinction: Status-specific types of Internet usage, Social Science Quarterly 90(2): 274-291, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x

Rydzewski, P. (2025). Nierówności cyfrowe i rozwój zrównoważony. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 20(1), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6691

Biogram autora

Paweł Rydzewski - Instytut Socjologii, Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, Polska

Sociologist specializing in social research methodology, statistics and quantitative data analysis. Research related to sustainable development and public opinion in the field of environmental protection and renewable energy sources.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##