Architectural solutions for contemporary aesthetic medicine clinics – a case study
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 21 (2025)
-
Museums of medicine in Europe - architecture, history, identity
Rafał Strojny7-24
-
The model as a medium for expressing the third dimension in the work of a landscape architect
Patryk Czerwiński, Justyna Kadlec25-34
-
Changes in rural farmstead layouts in the Knyszyn Forest area
Joanna Orłowska-Rogalska, Marta Baum35-41
-
Perception of diversity in urban culture: examining interior architecture students’ views on campus accessibility
Sariye Selhan Yalçın Usal, A. Nilay Evcil42-50
-
Assessment of the technical condition of a historic building using photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning: the case of the Juliusz Osterwa Theatre in Lublin
Michał Wac, Weronika Kendzierawska-Foryś51-63
-
Direct perception and algorithmic data processing: a comparative study of creative processes in an artistic project at the Kłodzko Fortress
Aleksandra Sztorc, Aleksandra Typek64-73
-
Superhospital as a form of centralised medical care – a cure for contemporary problems in the healthcare sector or a utopian dream?
Rafał Strojny74-85
-
Between integration and expression: BIPV façades in Basel – a comparative study
Magdalena Muszyńska-Łanowy86-97
-
Greenery in a modernist area
Patrycja Zawiska98-104
-
Julian Zakharevich’s bookcase: between design and implementation
Nadiia Datsko105-116
-
Ways of implementing green spaces in urban areas based on selected market revitalization projects in Greater Poland
Karol Tomczak117-127
-
Architectural solutions for contemporary aesthetic medicine clinics – a case study
Rafał Strojny, Aleskandra Murawska128-139
-
Architectural solutions for contemporary dental clinics based on scientific research – a case study
Rafał Strojny, Wiktoria Błasiak140-155
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 3
2024-12-27 7
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2024-12-27 7
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2024-12-27 8
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2023-12-29 11
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2023-12-19 13
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2022-12-30 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2022-12-27 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2022-12-27 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2022-12-27 4
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2021-12-30 11
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2021-12-30 9
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2021-12-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2021-12-30 8
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The dynamic development of aesthetic medicine in recent years has led to an increase in demand for modern medical facilities that combine high sanitary and hygiene standards with aesthetics and comfort of use. Aesthetic medicine clinics are a specific type of facility that combines outpatient and surgical functions, while requiring spaces that are patient-friendly and functional for staff use. The aim of the study was to identify the key principles of designing aesthetic medicine clinics and to develop a model concept for a clinic in the Lublin region. A systematic review of scientific literature and a case study were used. Issues related to healing architecture, biophilic design, ergonomics, healthcare facility design and infection control were analysed. The results of the research indicate that the integration of the principles of healing architecture and biophilic design, ensuring patient privacy, staff ergonomics, strict adherence to infection control standards, as well as the aesthetics and branding aspects of the facility, are of key importance. The developed model design confirms that it is possible to combine aesthetics, functionality and sanitary safety. The architecture of aesthetic medicine clinics should be treated as an integral part of the therapeutic process, supporting the patient-doctor relationship and positive user experiences.
Keywords:
References
Barone M, De Bernardis R, Perischetti P. Aesthetic medicine across generations: evolving trends and influences. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2025;49(11):3274−3276. doi:10.1007/s00266-024-04353-y.
International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS Global Survey 2024. Available from: https://www.isaps.org/media/oogpzodr/isaps-global-survey_2024.pdf [Accessed 07 Sep 2025].
Feng LF. Characteristics and emerging trends in modern aesthetic medicine. Chinese Medical Journal. 2020;133(6):741−742. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000679.
Yetti AE. Study of healthy architecture approach in architectural design at health care facilities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Healthcare Facilities. 2021;1(1):47−55.
Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu X, DuBose J, Seo HB, Choi Y, et al. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2008;1(3):61−125. doi:10.1177/193758670800100306.
Brambilla A, Rebecchi A, Capolongo S. Evidence-based hospital design: a literature review of the recent publications about the impact of the built environment on hospital occupants’ and organisational outcomes. Annali di Igiene. 2019;31(2):165−180. doi:10.7416/ai.2019.2269.
Ulrich RS. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science. 1984;224(4647):420−421. doi:10.1126/science.6143402.
Ulrich RS. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning. 1986;13:29−44. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8.
Gu J, Liu H, Lu H. Can even a small amount of greenery be helpful in reducing stress? A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(16):9778. doi:10.3390/ijerph19169778.
Zhong W, Schröder T, Bekkering J. Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: a critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2022;11(1):114−141. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006.
Zhao Y, Zhan Q, Xu T. Biophilic design as an important bridge for sustainable interaction between humans and the environment: based on practice in Chinese healthcare space. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2022;2022:8184534. doi:10.1155/2022/8184534.
Khatib IA, Samara F, Ndiaye M. A systematic review of the impact of therapeutic biophilic design on health and wellbeing of patients and care providers in healthcare service settings. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2024;10. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2024.1467692.
Strojny R. Contemporary design trends in specialist hospitals in Europe. Lublin: Lublin University of Technology Publishing House; 2024.
Strojny R, Przesmycka N. The specifics and forms of art in contemporary healthcare facilities – European trends. Arts. 2025;14(4):1−30. doi:10.3390/arts14040093.
Pratiwi AB. Behind open doors: patient privacy and the impact of design in primary health care – a qualitative study in Indonesia. Frontiers in Medicine. 2022;9:915237. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.915237.
Collier H. Infection control in aesthetic medicine. ACE Group World; 2020. Available from: https://uk.acegroup.online/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ACE-Group-Infection-Control-Guideline.pdf [Accessed 07 Sep 2025].
Facility Guidelines Institute. 2022 FGI Guidelines – benefit-cost analysis. Available from: https://fgiguidelines.org/resource/2022-fgi-guidelines-benefit-cost-analysis/ [Accessed 07 Sep 2025].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guide to infection prevention for outpatient settings. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/media/pdfs/Outpatient-Guide-508.pdf [Accessed 07 Sep 2025].
Halawa F, Madathil SC, Gittler A, Khasawneh M. Advancing evidence-based healthcare facility design: a systematic literature review. Health Care Management Science. 2020;23(3):453−480. doi:10.1007/s10729-020-09506-4.
Zamani Z, Puccetti C, Joy T. Blueprints for better care: unveiling the role of clinic design in enhancing patient experience and efficiency. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2025;18(3):33−68. doi:10.1177/19375867251328016.
Ivanov K, Karova M, Spasova G. Design and development of a medical clinic service system. Engineering Proceedings. 2024;70(1):27. doi:10.3390/engproc2024070027.
Al-Dhubaibi MS, Mohammed GF, Atef LM, Bahaj SS, Al-Dhubaibi AM, Bukhari AM. Artificial intelligence in aesthetic medicine: applications, challenges, and future directions. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2025;24(6):e70241. doi:10.1111/jocd.70241.
Thunga S, Khan M, Cho SI, Na JI, Yoo J. AI in aesthetic/cosmetic dermatology: current and future. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2024;24(1):e16640. doi:10.1111/jocd.16640.
Liew S, Silberberg M, Chantrey J. Understanding and treating different patient archetypes in aesthetic medicine. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2020;19(2):296−302. doi:10.1111/jocd.13227.
Anåker A, Heylighen A, Nordin S, Elf M. Design quality in the context of healthcare environments: a scoping review. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2016;10(4):136−150. doi:10.1177/1937586716679404.
Cribb A, Pullin G. Aesthetics for everyday quality: one way to enrich healthcare improvement debates. Medical Humanities. 2022;48(4):480−488. doi:10.1136/medhum-2021-012330.
Rehn J, Schuster K. Clinic design as placebo – using design to promote healing and support treatments. Behavioral Sciences. 2017;7(4):77. doi:10.3390/bs7040077.
Becker F, Sweeney B, Parsons K. Ambulatory facility design and patients’ perceptions of healthcare quality. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2008;1(4):35−54. doi:10.1177/193758670800100405.
Ai Y, Rahman MK, Newaz MS, Gazi MAI, Rahaman MA, Mamun AA, et al. Determinants of patients’ satisfaction and trust toward healthcare service environment in general practice clinics. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:856750. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856750.
Srivastava C. Effect of clinic design on patient care: perceptions of medical staff and patients. The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology and Society. 2017;10(2):1−12.
Article Details
Abstract views: 15

