On the synergy of urban plan
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017)
-
Synergy in non-ideal „ideal city” – the attempts to integrate Zamość
Jan Wrana5-17
-
Synergy as a criterion for evaluation of projects revitalization of city centers
Adam Derlatka019-028
-
Recovering visual contacts in the historic cityscape
Yuliia Frolova29-35
-
The use of public utility facility entered into the register of monuments to fulfill the contemporary occupancy function
Mieczysław Brzozowski, Katarzyna Święcicka-Brzozowska037-058
-
Variable theater space and synergy
Piotr Obracaj059-068
-
Sacrum versus Synergy
Jurij Kryworuczko, Bogusław Podhalański069-080
-
„Seal in the building” – the integration element
Piotr Gleń, Bartosz Szostak081-088
-
Transformation of old-town’s districts after 1989/1990 in Poland and Germany
Piotr Fiuk099-108
-
Śródka District in Poznan – physical and mental borders within the city
Teresa Bardzińska-Bonenberg089-098
-
Synergy of contemporary architecture and materials science
Petro Rychkov, Nataliya Lushnikova109-118
-
From the ground floor of the city
Wacław Seruga119-138
-
Light in architecture and urban planning – the underestimated element bonding the city
Małgorzata Bartnicka139-152
-
Space Syntax in communication structure of Lublin’s district – Kośminek
Wojciech Kocki, Bartłomiej Kwiatkowski153-164
-
City as a human-friendly organism
Aleksandra Prokopska, Anna Martyka165-174
-
The importance of the space in the process of merging the city
Aleksandra Hereć, Michał Pieczka, Olga Skoczylas175-182
-
On the synergy of urban plan
Zbigniew Zuziak183-198
-
Synergy in architectural design and urban planning
Krzysztof Lenartowicz199-212
-
Synergy in economics, as an element of urban creation in China
Dariusz Gaweł213-222
-
Synergistic completeness of contemporary villa architecture in urban space
Monika Gała-Walczowska223-232
-
Synergy in the seaside resort architecture – Sopot case study
Krystyna Pokrzywnicka233-244
Archives
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2020-04-23 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2020-01-24 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2019-11-20 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2019-09-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2019-10-10 15
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2019-10-10 21
-
Vol. 16 No. 4
2019-10-14 14
-
Vol. 16 No. 3
2019-10-14 15
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2019-10-14 12
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2019-10-15 20
-
Vol. 15 No. 4
2019-10-17 19
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2019-10-15 13
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2019-10-16 14
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2019-10-09 28
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2020-04-07 19
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2020-04-15 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2020-04-20 15
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2020-04-25 14
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
In this paper the interpretation of synergic effects of planning decisions is discussed in the context of urban development strategies and respective attributes of urban plan. The author presents the concept of urban planning formula according to the model named as SAS (acronym from: strategies, actors, structures). This concept refers to urban strategies requiring new urban policy tools and even the reform of existing land use controls system. These changes should allow for better logical connections between spatial planning, strategic planning and urban design. Regarding potentials for inducing synergic effect of urban development as the assessment criterion of the plan, the author discusses the attributes of this plan which are appropriate to stimulate synergic functional links between the elements of land use arrangement, designed in a given planning document, and respective changes in socio-economic and cultural space. Two situations were identified as circumstances generating such effects. First type of such preconditions is described as the postulate to provide clear structural relations between strategic projects and “urbanistic construction” defined as the layout of main physical elements crystalizing spatial structure of the territory covered by the plan. Second significant type of preconditions for achieving synergic effects of the plan depends on the type of urban development strategies including the implementation strategy of key projects. Lessons learned from the cases of good practice in the area of operational urbanism indicate that mutually beneficial effects of interactions between key urban projects can be observed in case of implementation strategies where the respective rules of implementation are clearly defined with regard to urban construction of the planned land use layout. Significant role is also played here by the consistent implementation of the model defined in the long term vision for city development. Such a situation can be exemplified by the principles of urban development strategy defined for metropolitan Copenhagen in the concept known as the “Finger Plan”.
Keywords:
Article Details
Abstract views: 482
Downloads: 342
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.
