Publikowanie artykułów jest możliwe po podpisaniu zgody na przeniesienie licencji na czasopismo.
Lighting is a critical factor influencing creativity and productivity in educational environments, particularly for architecture students, whose work demands both technical precision and imaginative exploration. This study investigates the impact of architectural design and lighting conditions on creativity within eight drawing workshops at the Department of Architecture, Mostaganem, Algeria. The methodology combined architectural surveys to document spatial characteristics, photometric measurements to objectively assess natural and hybrid lighting quality, and the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT) to evaluate students’ creative performance. Findings revealed significant disparities in lighting conditions across the workshops, with Workshop 2 exhibiting optimal illumination and Workshop 4 demonstrating critically insufficient levels. Improved lighting conditions were shown to significantly enhance creativity in geometric tasks, particularly in fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. However, for figural tasks requiring complex representational skills, lighting improvements alone had a limited effect, suggesting that higher-order creative processes depend on additional cognitive and instructional support. The study concludes that well-designed lighting is essential for fostering creativity in precision-based tasks, while more holistic approaches integrating environmental and pedagogical enhancements are necessary for advanced creative outcomes. These findings provide actionable insights for optimising educational spaces to support the cognitive and creative demands of architecture students.
[1] Boyce P. R., Human Factors in Lighting, Third Edit. CRC Press, 2014. http://doi.org/10.1201/b16707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b16707
[2] Chęć-Małyszek A., “The concept of light and color as a key element of experiencing ‘feeling architecture,’” Budownictwo i Architektura, 18(1), (2019), 11-21. http://doi.org/10.24358/Bud-Arch_19_181_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24358/Bud-Arch_19_181_02
[3] Tregenza, P., Daylighting. Routledge, 2013. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203724613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203724613
[4] Veitch J. A. and Galasiu A. D., “The physiological and psychological effects of windows, daylight, and view at home: review and research agenda”, National Research Council of Canada, 2012. http://doi.org/10.4224/20375039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e554552013-001
[5] Stefani O., Pross A., Schöllhorn I., Ilg L., IAO F., Plischke H., “The impact of dynamic lighting on cognitive processes”, in Lux Europa, Ljubljana, 2017, 177-181.
[6] Dubois C., Demers C., Potvin A., “The influence of daylighting on occupants; comfort and diversity of luminous ambiences in architecture”, in American Solar Energy Society (ASES), SOLAR, Cleaveland, Ohio, 2007.
[7] Shishegar N., Boubekri M., “Natural light and productivity: analyzing the impacts of daylighting on students’ and workers’ health and alertness”, International Journal of Advances in Chemical Engineering and Biological Science, 3(1), (2016), 1-6. http://doi.org/10.15242/ijacebs.ae0416104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15242/IJACEBS.AE0416104
[8] Ahadi A., Khanmohammadi M., Masoudinejad M., Alirezaie B., “Improving student performance by proper utilization of daylight in educational environments (Case study: IUST School of Architecture)”, Acta Technica Napocensis: Civil Engineering & Architecture, 59(1), 2016.
[9] Heschong L., “Daylighting and human performance”, ASHRAE Journal, (2002), 65-67.
[10] Gray F. and Downie A., “Designing thriving school ecosystems: the synergy of biophilic design, wellbeing science, and systems science”, Architecture, 4(3), (2024), 594-612. http://doi.org/10.3390/architecture4030031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture4030031
[11] Sunger V. and Vaidya P., “Evaluation of daylight performance of the new workshop building at CEPT University, Ahmedabad”, in Building Simulation Conference Proceedings, 2019, 1160-1168. http://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2019.210912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2019.210912
[12] Abdelhakim M., Lim Y.-W., Kandar M. Z., “Optimum glazing configurations for visual performance in algerian classrooms under mediterranean climate”, Journal of Daylighting, 6(1), (2019), 11-22. http://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2019.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2019.2
[13] Costanzo V., Evola G., Marletta L., “A review of daylighting strategies in schools: state of the art and expected future trends”, Buildings, 7(2), (2017), 41. http://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7020041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7020041
[14] Barkmann C., Wessolowski N., Schulte-Markwort M., “Applicability and efficacy of variable light in schools”, Physiology and Behaviour, 105(3), (2012), 621–627. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.020
[15] Kanlı E., “Assessment of creativity: theories and methods”, in Creativity - A Force to Innovation, IntechOpen, 2021. http://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93971
[16] Szmidt K. J., Majewska-Owczarek A., “Theoretical models of teaching creativity - critical review”, Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 7(1), (2020), 54–72. http://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0004
[17] Baer J., “Implications of domain specificity for creativity assessment”, in Domain Specificity of Creativity, Elsevier, 2016, 103–140. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799962-3.00005-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799962-3.00005-7
[18] Doheim R. M., Yusof N., “Creativity in architecture design studio. Assessing students’ and instructors’ perception”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, (2020), 119418. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119418
[19] Enad S. E., AL-Mamoori H. S., “The comprehensive definition of creativity in the architectural design action”, in 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Avanced Technology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2022. http://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160852
[20] Clapham M. M., “Testing/Measurement/Assessment”, in Encyclopedia of Creativity, 2nd ed., Elsevier, 2011, 458-464. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00220-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00220-X
[21] Handayani S. A., Rahayu Y. S., Agustini R., “Students’ creative thinking skills in biology learning: fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), (2021), 012040. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012040
[22] Najihah S., Jamal B., Dayana N., Halim B. A., Ikram M., Alias B., “A preliminary study on the level of creativity among chemistry students in district of Melaka Tengah”, Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(16), (2020), 752-761.
[23] Dumas D., Schmidt L. C., Alexander P. A., “Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design”, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, (2016), 50-66. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.002
[24] Potur A. A., Barkul Ö., “Creative thinking in architectural design education”, in 1st International Conference on Built Environment & Information Technologies, Ankara, Turkey, 2006, 113-125.
[25] Runco M. A., “Divergent thinking”, in Encyclopedia of Creativity, 2nd ed., vol. 1, Elsevier, 2011, 400-403. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00077-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00077-7
[26] Runco M. A., Acar S., “Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential”, Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), (2012), 66-75. http://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
[27] Palmiero M., The relationships between abstraction and creativity. Elsevier Inc., 2020. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816400-6.00004-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816400-6.00004-3
[28] Park E. J., Lee S., “Creative thinking in the architecture design studio: bibliometric analysis and literature review”, Buildings, 12(6), (2022), 828. http://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060828
[29] Kruisselbrink T., Dangol R., Rosemann A., “Photometric measurements of lighting quality: An overview”, Building and Environment, 138 (2018), 42–52. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.028
[30] NBN L 14-002:1975, “Eclairage intérieur [Indoor Lighting]”, 1975.
[31] Almeida L. S., Prieto L. P., Ferrando M., Oliveira E., Ferrándiz, C., “Torrance Test of creative thinking: the question of its construct validity”, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), (2008), 53-58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003
[32] Torrance E. P., “Torrance tests of creative thinking: interpretive manual”, Bensenville, Illinois, 2018.
[33] Amégan S., “Contribution à l’analyse des résultats des tests de pensée créative de E.P. Torrance par la technique de l’évaluation informative [Contribution to the analysis of the results of E.P. Torrance's creative thinking tests using the informative evaluation technique]”, Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 6(3), (2009), 439-450. http://doi.org/10.7202/900296ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/900296ar
[34] Wallach M. A., Torrance E. P., “Torrance tests of creative thinking: norms -- technical manual”, American Educational Research Journal, 5(2), (1968), 272, 1968. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312005002272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1161826
[35] EN 12464-1:2021, “Light and lighting – Lighting of work places – Part 1: Indoor work places. European Committee for Standardization (CEN)”, 2021.
[36] ISO 8995:1989, “Principles of visual ergonomics: The lighting of indoor work systems”.
[37] Humble S., Dixon P., Mpofu E., “Factor structure of the torrance tests of creative thinking figural form a in Kiswahili speaking children: Multidimensionality and influences on creative behavior”, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, (2017), 33-44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.005
[38] Weiss S., Wilhelm O., “Is flexibility more than fluency and originality?”, Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), (2022), 96. http://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040096
Abstract views: 504
Downloads: 417

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Publikowanie artykułów jest możliwe po podpisaniu zgody na przeniesienie licencji na czasopismo.
