Publikowanie artykułów jest możliwe po podpisaniu zgody na przeniesienie licencji na czasopismo.
he aim of this study is to determine the scale and spatial distribution of potential exclusions from the housing stock in Poland, based on the 2021 National Census data contained in the Local Data Bank, distinguishing between technical exclusions (resulting from the durability of buildings) and qualitative exclusions (resulting from insufficient equipment of dwellings with basic installations). Each value was calculated for counties. Based on a review of the relevant literature, it was assumed that the average useful life of residential buildings is 100 years. The quality of the housing stock was calculated based on the level of equipment with installations (running water, bathroom, gas, flushable toilet). The analysis confirmed that the vulnerability of the housing stock to exclusions varies significantly across Poland, driven by both technical and qualitative factors that do not clearly overlap. In a broader perspective, the findings of this study can provide a foundation for designing territorially differentiated programs for renovation and modernization of housing stock and contribute to improving decision-making processes in housing policy at the local and regional levels.
[1] Randolph W.C., Housing depreciation and aging bias in the consumer price index. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 6(3) (1988) 359–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/1391888
[2] Colwell P.F., Functional obsolescence and an extension of Hedonic Theory. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 4(1) (1991) 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171360
[3] Baer W.C., Housing obsolescenace and depreciation. Journal of Planning Literature 5(4) (1991) 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229100500401
[4] Tamrazyan A.G., Ubysz A., Kharun M., The degree of physical depreciation of buildings and structures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1687(1) (2020) 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1687/1/012008
[5] Feng H., Zhao J., Zhang H., Zhu S., Li D., Thurairajah N., Uncertainties in whole-building life cycle assessment: a systematic review. Journal of Building Engineering 50 (2022) 104191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104191
[6] Thomsen A., Van der Flier K., Understanding obsolescence: a conceptual model for buildings. Building Research & Information, 39(4) 2011 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.576328
[7] Thomsen A., Van der Flier K., Nieboer N., Analysing obsolescence: an elaborated model for residential buildings. Structural Survey 33(3) (2015) 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-12-2014-0040
[8] Huuhka S., Lahdensivu J., Statistical and geographical study on demolished buildings. Building Research & Information 44(1) (2016) 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.980101
[9] Sandberg N.H., Sartori I., Heidrich O., Dawson R., Dascalaki E., Dimitriou S., Vimm-r T., Filippidou F., Stegnar G., Šijanec Zavrl M., Brattebø H., Dynamic building stock modelling: application to 11 European countries to support the energy efficiency and retrofit ambitions of the EU. Energy and Buildings 132 (2016) 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.100
[10] Hasik V., Escott E., Bates R., Carlisle S., Faircloth B., Bilec M.M., Comparative whole-building life cycle assessment of renovation and new construction. Building and Environment 161 (2019) 106218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106218
[11] Kovacic I., Zoller V., Building life cycle optimization tools for early design phases. Energy 92 (2015) 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.027
[12] Ji S., Lee B., Yi M.Y., Building life-span prediction for life cycle assessment and life cycle cost using machine learning: a big data approach. Building and Environment 205 (2021) 108267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108267
[13] Dudek H., Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska A., Housing deprivation among polish households: prevalence and associated factors. Real Estate Management and Valuation 32(2) (2024) 58–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2024-0015
[14] Ulman P., Ćwiek M., Housing poverty in polish households and its diversity. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia 20(1) (2020) 437–455. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2020-0026
[15] Olech P., Wykluczenie mieszkaniowe – zarys głównych problemów mieszkaniowych w Polsce oraz rekomendacje dla całościowej polityki społecznej. Warsaw: EAPN Polska, 2010. (in Polish)
[16] Statistics Poland, Local data bank. 2021 national population and housing census. Available: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/ [Accessed: 2025].
[17] Baker K., Collins J.M., Hopf A., Development of an indicator for the homeowner improvement and repairs market. W98-6, Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 1998.
[18] Bal-Gunduz Y., Estimating demand for IMF financing by low-income countries in response to shocks. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451874082.001
[19] Lahiri K., Yao W., Should transportation output be included as part of the coincident indicators system? CESifo Working Paper, No. 3477, 2011. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/46566
[20] Vanlande R., Nicolle C., and Cruz C., IFC and Building Lifecycle Management, Automation in Construction, 18(1, 2008 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.05.001
[21] Femenias P., Kadefors A., Edén M., The demonstration project as a tool for client driven innovation: exploring the possibilities from a Swedish perspective. Proceedings of the International Conference: Changing Roles; New Roles, New Challenges, Noordwijk an Zee, The Netherlands, 2009 199–210.
Abstract views: 232
Downloads: 210

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Publikowanie artykułów jest możliwe po podpisaniu zgody na przeniesienie licencji na czasopismo.
