Publikowanie artykułów jest możliwe po podpisaniu zgody na przeniesienie licencji na czasopismo.
The action research study examines the long-term socio-spatial impacts, pedagogical outcomes and potential and limitations of the design studies conducted by Istanbul Technical University (ITU) in Mardin. These studies were embodied in a holistic working process that included integrated studios and interdisciplinary urban design studios. Primary data were collected through reflective interviews with all stakeholders, including former students, academic staff, local community members, and institutional representatives, and examined through content analysis. The findings demonstrate that engaging with real-world social issues through integrated studio processes generates pedagogical outcomes and fosters a long-term sense of social responsibility among students’ professional careers, as well as socio-spatial benefits for the local community. By providing a long-term reflection on the ITU Mardint approach within the discourse on socially responsible architectural education, this study offers empirical data to support the development of future experiential learning cycles.
[1] Adler A., Understanding Human Nature. Routledge, 2013.
[2] Ahunbay Z., Kültür Mirasını Koruma İlke ve Teknikleri. Yem Publishing, 2023.
[3] Aristotle., Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[4] Brewis G., A Social History of Student Volunteering: Britain and Beyond, 1880-1980. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
[5] Canizaro V.B., Design-Build in Architectural Education: Motivations, Practices, Challenges, Successes and Failures. Archnet-IJAR 6(3) (2012) 20-36.
[6] Demir Y., “Yerel İnisiyatif + Küresel Kaynak” MARDINT: İTÜ Mardin Disiplinlerarası Eğitim, Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi. Arkitekt (3) (2008) 74-78.
[7] Demir Y., Öztürk P., Ayataç H., Deviren S., Beygo C., Üniversite-Kamusal Mekan İlişkisi. İTÜ Vakfı Dergisi (57) (2011) 45-49.
[8] Demir Y., Mardint: ITU Mardin Interdisciplinary Education Research and Development Center. In: Islamic Urban Heritage: Research, Preservation and Management Summer School Turkey, June 20-July 17, 2012. Istanbul; IRCICA, 2013, 125-132.
[9] Dewey J., Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi, 1938.
[10] Dewey J., The Child and the Curriculum. The University of Chicago Press, 1966.
[11] Dewey J., How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Henry Regnery Company, 1971.
[12] Dewey J., Democracy and Education. A Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication, 2001.
[13] Ellmann R., Oscar Wilde. Vintage Books, 1988.
[14] Esfijani A., Hussain F., Chang E., University Social Responsibility Ontology. Engineering Intelligent Systems 21(4) (2013) 271-281.
[15] Harry B., Sturges K.M., Klingner J.K., Mapping the Process: An Exemplar of Process and Challenge in Grounded Theory Analysis. Educational Researcher 34(2) (2005) 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034002003
[16] Keeton M.T., Tate P.J., Learning by Experience – What, Why, How. Jossey-Bass, 1978.
[17] Kemmis S., McTaggart R., Nixon R., The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer, 2014.
[18] Khatami S.M., Boujari P., Ranjbar E., Toward a Social Responsibility‑Based Model for Urban Design Education. Urban Design International 28(4) (2023) 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-022-00195-9
[19] Kolb D., Experiential learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Pearson Education, Inc., 2015.
[20] Lopez S.G., Benitez J.L.S., Sanchez J.M.A., Social Knowledge Management from the Social Responsibility of the University for the Promotion of Sustainable Development. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 (2015) 2112-2116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.327
[21] MacIntyre A., After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.
[22] McNiff J., Whitehead J., Action Research: Principles and Practice. Routledge, 2002.
[23] Meseguer-Sanchez V., Abad-Segura E., Belmonte-Urena L.J., Molina-Moreno V., Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(13) (2020) 1-30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134729
[24] Meyer H., Bauhaus und Gesellschaft. Bauhaus 3(1) (1929).
[25] Paunescu C., Cantaragiu R., The Social Role of University Entrepreneurship. In: Management Association I, Economics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, And Applications. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2015, 1055-1071.
[26] Ramos-Monge E.L., Llinas-Audet X., Barrena-Martinez J., Drivers and Barriers of University Social Responsibility: Integration into Strategic Plans. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 15(1-2) (2019) 174-201. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2019.098475
[27] Roth G., Bradbury H., Learning History: An Action Research Practice in Support of Actionable Learning. In: Reason P, Bradbury H, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2008, 350-365.
[28] Salama A., Contemporary Qatari Architecture As An Open Textbook. ArchNet-IJAR 1(3) (2007) 101-114.
[29] Salama A., A Theory For Integrating Knowledge In Architectural Design Education. ArchNet-IJAR 2(1) (2008) 100-128.
[30] Saldana J., The Coding Manual For Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications, 2015.
[31] Schön D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Routledge, 2016.
[32] Simons M., Masschelein J., From Schools to Learning Environments: The Dark Side of Being Exceptional. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42(3-4) (2008) 687-704.
[33] Taylor C., Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[34] THEQC. Toplumsal Katkı Politikası. https://web.archive.org/web/20220303041053/https://portal.yokak.gov.tr/makale/kurumun-toplumsal-katki-politikasi/ 2022. (Accessed 13 Apr 2025).
[35] Higher Education Law. The Law on Higher Education. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/the-law-on-higher-education.pdf 2023. (Accessed 20 May 2023).
[36] Pak B., De Smet A., editors. Experiential Learning in Architectural Education: Design-build and Live Projects. Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267683
[37] Agiel A., Albdour A., Meaning-Making Through Community Constructs in Architectural Education. In: Auer ME, Rüütmann T, editors. Futureproofing Engineering Education for Global Responsibility. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer, 2025.
[38] Alguren B., Toward behavioral learning outcomes: A case study of an experiential learning approach and students’ self-reported facilitators and barriers for pro-environmental behavior. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 26(9) (2025) 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2025-0063
[39] Yeler G.M., Learning through Place: Place-Based Design and Education Approaches in Architectural Design Studio. In: Theory and Practice in Sustainable Planning and Design: Planning, Design, Applications. Peter Lang AG, 2020, 229-243.
[40] Toy B., Pulat Gökmen G., Mimarlık Eğitiminde Uygulamalı Öğrenme Ortamları Sunan Tasarla/Yap Stüdyolarına İlişkin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirme. Tasarım Kuram 19(40) (2023) 483-498. https://doi.org/10.59215/tasarimkuram.406
[41] Montt-Blanchard D., Najmi S., Spinillo C.G., Considerations for Community Engagement in Design Education. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 9(2) (2023) 234-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2023.05.004
[42] Salama A., Patil M.P., The Socius in Architectural Pedagogy: Transformative Design Studio Teaching Models. Architecture 5(3) (2025) 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture5030061
Abstract views: 160
Downloads: 167

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Publikowanie artykułów jest możliwe po podpisaniu zgody na przeniesienie licencji na czasopismo.
