„BEFORE WE UNDERSTAND WHAT WE ARE DOING, WE NEED TO KNOW HOW WE THINK”
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Numer Nr 8 (2019)
-
„OPEN FOR CONSERVATION”: LIVE EXPERIENCES
Cobau Andreina Costanzi79-88
-
THE ETHICAL PROBLEMS OF ARCHITECTURAL RECONSTRUCTION – HUNGARIAN CASE STUDIES
Ádám Arnóth1-8
-
ON PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVITY
Wolfgang Baatz9-14
-
REFLECTION ON CONSERVATION-RESTORATION PRACTICE TODAY. A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE
Stefan Belishki, Susan Corr15-28
-
AFTER BRANDI – UMBERTO BALDINI AND THE MODERN THEORY OF CONSERVATION-RESTORATION IN ITALY
Giorgio Bonsanti29-36
-
PROFESSIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY POSITION AND ROLE OF ACADEMIC CONSERVATOR-RESTORERS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Methodical symbiosis and transdisciplinary cooperation using the example of the rebuilding and conservation of two Ottoman palaces in Istanbul
Jörg Breitenfeldt37-42
-
INTEGRATION OF BRANDI’S THEORY IN THE CONTEXT OF EASTERN RELIGIONS AND CULTURES
Francesca Capanna43-52
-
RETHINKING MAIURI: ENHANCEMENT OF STUCCO FINDINGS FROM THE HERCULANEUM ARCHAEOLOGICAL PARK
Filippo Edoardo Capasso, Francesca Castiello, Simona Dichiara, Manuel Giandomenico, Natalie Iacopino, Erika Maddalena, Camilla Mauri, Sokol Muca, Mariagiulia Roscigno, Sofia Schiattone53-64
-
THE METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CONSERVATION DATA FOR STUCCO ARTIFACTS
Filippo Edoardo Capasso, Francesca Castiello, Simona Dichiara, Manuel Giandomenico, Natalie Iacopino, Erika Maddalena, Camilla Mauri, Sokol Muca, Mariagiulia Roscigno, Sofia Schiattone65-72
-
THE STUCCO DECORATION OF THE MONUMENTAL ARCH ON THE DECUMANUS MAXIMUS AT HERCULANEUM
Marina Caso73-78
-
“CONSERVATION VERSUS RECONSTRUCTION.” DO WE NEED OTHER OR NEW CRITERIA FOR CONSERVING ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES OF THE 20THCENTURY?
Thomas Danzl89-102
-
THE CONSERVATION-RESTORATION OF ARCHITECTURAL STATUARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SCULPTURE AND ARCHITECTURE
Camille De Clercq, Judy De Roy103-112
-
LUCIO FONTANA AND ARCHITECTURE
Barbara Ferriani113-122
-
AWARENESS OF MATERIALITY IN TIME AND CONDITION. THOUGHTS ON THE RELATION BETWEEN ART HISTORY AND CONSERVATION
Andreas Huth, Katharine Stahlbuhk123-138
-
„BEFORE WE UNDERSTAND WHAT WE ARE DOING, WE NEED TO KNOW HOW WE THINK”
Dörthe Jakobs139-150
-
THE TEMPLE OF EPICURIOUS APOLLO AT BASSAE: PRESERVE THE STONE OR UNCOVER ITS TRUE NATURE?
Eva Kapadoukaki, Michail Soumas151-158
-
GIOTTO’S STIGMATIZATION OF SAINT FRANCIS: AN APPROACH FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE IMAGE
Maria Rosa Lanfranchi159-174
-
ETHICS AND BASIC PRINCIPLES OF RESTORING HISTORICAL STONE MONUMENTS
Jadwiga W. Łukaszewicz175-184
-
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION
Helia Marcal185-210
-
VIRTUAL CONSERVATION-RESTORATION VS. ACTUAL CONSERVATION-RESTORATION IN THE CONSERVATION OF FRAGMENTARY ARTEFACTS: THE CASE STUDY FRESCOES FROM SYBARIS - COPIA (ITALY)
Sokol Muca211-222
-
CONSERVATION-RESTORATION AND CONSERVATION SCIENCE - THE CHALLENGE OF TRANSDISCIPLINARITY
Mechthild Noll-Minor223-238
-
QUALITY PARAMETERS IN CONSERVATION-RESTORATION CHOICES – THE CASE OF THE TOWER OF THE WINDS IN ATHENS
Maria Papadopoulou, Andromache Gazi239-254
-
ETHICAL CHALLENGES IN THE CONSERVATION OF THE WALL PAINTINGS OF CHAPEL 11 AT THE SACRO MONTE DI VARALLO
Francesca Piqué, Giacinta Jean255-268
-
UNITÉ DE DOCTRINE – CONTINGENCY OF PRACTICE? TOWARDS A RE-READING OF TWENTIETH CENTURY PRINCIPLES OF BUILDING HERITAGE CONSERVATION
Andreas Putz269-280
-
THE VOICE OF CONSERVATION-RESTORATION ON MULTI-DISCIPLINARY RESTORATION PROJECTS
Tanja Røskar281-290
-
CONSERVATION ETHICS TODAY: ARE OUR CONSERVATION-RESTORATION THEORIES AND PRACTICE READY FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY? INTRODUCTORY NOTES TO SOME CENTRAL ISSUES
Ursula Schädler-Saub291-300
-
DEALING WITH AUTHENTICITY IN THE CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF WALL PAINTINGS AND ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES
Ursula Schädler-Saub301-324
-
THE CONSERVATOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DETERIORATION OF MONUMENTS
Bogusław Szmygin325-333
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Authors
Abstrakt
The article deals with an interesting debate following a project that started with the question raised by the press: “Why not overpaint or reconstruct the missing parts of a famous wall painting?” and concluded with a panel discussion that conveyed a better understanding of restoration theories on the part of both the press and the parish. Moreover, part of the project featured an exhibition to communicate the basis of our restoration theories and understanding, whilst requesting a dialogue with the priest and the parish; so, they might communicate their intentions and opportunely discuss theological interpretations with regard to the missing part in the wall-painting, which was important for us in reaching an understanding of the principles behind their ideas.
Słowa kluczowe:
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Abstract views: 478
Downloads: 408
Dörthe Jakobs - State Office for Preservation of Monuments
PhD in art history, Conservator at the State Office for Preservation of Monuments (Federal State of Baden-Württemberg, Germany, below: LAD BW), graduated in Conservation-Restoration, Member of the Board of the Monitoring Group of ICOMOS Germany, Member of the NSC Conservation and Restoration of ICOMOS Germany
