Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income

Yanling  Mao; Na Li

doi:10.35784/pe.2022.1.07

Open full text

pdf

Published: Jan 3, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.07

Issue Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)

Articles

The Efficiency of Health Systems in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the EU Countries
Tamara Rađenović, Vladimir Radivojević, Bojan Krstić, Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Živković

7-15
Efficiency Assessment of Tax Measures in the European Countries Against the Effects of COVID-19
Daria Bilenko, Serhii Kozlovskyi, Natalya Ivanyuta, Viktoriia Baidala, Ruslan Lavrov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi

16-22
Formation of Sustainable Investment Attractiveness of Regions Under the Conditions of COVID-19
Tetiana Polozova, Yurii Kutsenko, Oleksandra Kanova

23-35
Going Green Supply Chain Management During COVID-19, Assessing the Best Supplier Selection Criteria: A Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Approach
Maryam Khokhar, Sayma Zia, Tahir Islam, Anshuman Sharma, Wasim Iqbal, Muhammad Irshad

36-51
Empowering Theory of Poverty Reduction for Sustainable Development: Does the Welfare of Descendants Matter?
Juliusz Piwowarski, Larysa Yankovska, Bohdan-Petro Koshovyi, Ira Von-Nagy, Andrii Yevstakhevych

52-63
Natural Resources in Function of Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Development of the EU Countries
Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Milićević, Bojan Krstić

64-70
Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income
Yanling Mao, Na Li

71-83
Sustainable Development and Religion. A European Perspective
Paweł Rydzewski

84-95
Role of Religion in Environmental Sustainability: An Indian Perspective
Sarita Kar, Manisha Tripathy

96-100
Analysis of Child Marriage and Related Policies in Indonesia: Sustainable Development Issue
Noverman Duadji, Novita Tresiana

101-113
Inclusive Education as a Tool For Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals on the Basis of Humanization of Society
Oksana Zhukova, Larysa Platash, Liudmyla Tymchuk

114-122
What is Right and What is Wrong in the Environmental Governance Model? Environmental Regulations for Improving Environmental Sustainability Ratings
Jajat S. Ardiwinata, Khalid Zaman, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Mohamed Haffar, Chairil Faif Pasani, Sriyanto Sriyanto

123-139
Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Government Financial Expenditure on Environmental Protection: An SBM Super-efficiency Model Based on Undesired Outputs
Su Jialu, Ma Zhiqiang, Li Mingxing, Fredrick Oteng Agyeman, Zhu Yue

140-150
Studies on Improving the Performance of Small and Micro Enterprises through Green Innovation
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu

151-161
Possibilities of Developing Sustainable World by Introducing Bioeconomy: Global Perspective
Oleh V. Skydan, Maryna I. Yaremova, Liudmyla V. Tarasovych, Vitalii Ye. Dankevych, Nataliia M. Kutsmus

162-170
Green Economy – Vector of Sustainable Development
Anar Ospanova, Iryna Popovychenko, Elena Chuprina

171-181
Challenges for Improving Agricultural Resilience in the Context of Sustainability and Rural Development
Mangirdas Morkunas, Agnė Žičkienė, Tomas Baležentis, Artiom Volkov, Dalia Štreimikienė, Erika Ribašauskienė

182-195
Time-Frequency Co-Movements Between Biomass Energy Consumption and Human Development in Brics Countries
Ngo Thai Hung

196-210
Impact of the Agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union on the Competitiveness of the Agricultural Sector of the Member States
Saule S. Shintaeva, Alexandr A. Pyagay, Makhabbat K. Iskakova, Botagoz N. Naukenova, Saule T. Zhumasheva

211-221
Air Pollution Regulations in China: A Policy Simulation Approach with Evolutionary Game
Zhaopeng Chu, Chen Bian, Jun Yang

222-233
Feminist Mining: A Step Towards Sustainable Mininig in India
Priya Singh, Ajit Kumar Behura

235-245
Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment and Sustainable Agriculture in Africa
Ping Ju, Muhammad Khalid Anser, Romanus Osabohien, Onyinye Ochuba, Rolle Remi Ahuru, Junaid Ashraf

246-255
Systematic Review on Urban Ecosystem Services in South-East Asia: Asean Countries
Nur Shazwanie Rosehan, Azlan Abas, Kadaruddin Aiyub

256-266
Financial Development and Sustainable Competitiveness in Arctic Region: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis
Farzan Yahya, Ghulam Abbas, Muhammad Hussain, Muhammad Waqas

267-278
Green Energy in the Caribbean: Influence on Toursim and Economic Development
Tatiana Tazikhina, Vladimir Kvasha, Yulia Solovova, Igbal Guliev

279-287
Samkhya Philosophy, Deep Ecology and Sustainable Development
Nanda Gopal Biswas, Gyan Prakash

288-292
Reproduction of Human Capital as a Strategic Priority for Sustainable Development of Regions
Olena Krasnonosova, Daria Mykhailenko, Ihor Yaroshenko

293-300
Environmental Aspects of the European Experience in Landscape Planning
Bao Yu, Jianmei Wang, Ya Li

301-309

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.07

Authors

Yanling Mao

maoyanling@ncu.edu.cn

School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, , China

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3151-9935

Na Li

lina@email.ncu.edu.cn

School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, , China

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9582-3381

Abstract

In recent years, China has put forward policies to improve rural infrastructure and promote the development of rural industries causing to dramatic transition in the living and employment conditions. Moreover, under the pressure of the high expenditure of living and the difficulty of finding jobs, new changes have taken place in the spatial behavior pattern of farmers’ residence and employment. Based on a field survey of 839 observations in 123 villages in Poyang Lake basin, China, we developed indicators to evaluate the suitability of rural living facilities (SLF) and work facilities (SWF). Multinomial logit regression model was used to measure the relationship between SWF, SLF and the spatial behavior patterns of farmers. The results show that: (1) SWF development in rural areas lags behind SLF; (2) Higher SLF is most distributed in suburban areas ; (3) Higher SWF is mostly distributed in suburban towns and characteristic towns; (4) The effects of SLF and SWF on the spatial behavior patterns of farmers are significantly positive; (5) Farmers in the urban-rural amphibious pattern usually obtain a higher income level, and also bring vitality to the countryside.

Keywords:

suitability of living facilities, suitability of work facilities, spatial behavior pattern, multinomial logit model, rural development, family income

References

CAO G., LI M., MA Y., TAO R., 2014, Selfemployment and intention of permanent urban settlement: Evidence from a survey of migrants in China’s four major urbanising areas, Urban Studies, 52(4): 639-664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014529346

CHEN S., LIU Z., 2016, What determines the settlement intention of rural migrants in China? Economic incentives versus sociocultural conditions, Habitat International, 58: 42-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.09.004

CHENG M., YANSUI L., ZHOU Y., 2019, Measuring the symbiotic development of rural housing and industry: A case study of Fuping County in the Taihang Mountains in China, Land Use Policy, 82: 307- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.013

DIAKOULAKI D., MAVROTAS G., PAPAYANNAKIS L., 1995, Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method, Computers & Operations Research, 22(7): 763-770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H

GEEDIPALLY S. R., TURNER P. A., PATIL S., 2011, Analysis of Motorcycle Crashes in Texas with Multinomial Logit Model, Transportation Research Record, 2265(1): 62-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2265-07

HARE D., 1999, ‘Push’ versus ‘pull’ factors in migration outflows and returns: Determinants of migration status and spell duration among China's rural population, The Journal of Development Studies, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389908422573

(3): 45-72.

HOLMES J., 2006, Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda, Journal of Rural Studies, 22(2): 142-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.006

HUANG Z., DU X., 2015, Assessment and determinants of residential satisfaction with public housing in Hangzhou, China, Habitat International, 47: 218-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.025

KIMARO P. J., TOWO N. N., MOSHI B. H., 2015, Determinants of Rural Youth's Participation in Agricultural Activities: The Case of Kahe Eaet Ward in Moshi Rural District,Tanzania, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(2):1-47.

LI J., ROSE N., 2017, Urban social exclusion and mental health of China's rural-urban migrants – A review and call for research, Health & Place, 48:20-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.08.009

LI S., DONG Y., ZHANG L., LIU C., 2021, Offfarm employment and poverty alleviation in rural China, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4):943- 952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63616-X

LI S., LIU Y., 2016, The jobs-housing relationship and commuting in Guangzhou, China: Hukou and dual structure, Journal of Transport Geography, 54:286-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.014

LI W., LI J., CUI J., 2020, Exploring rural decline with the perspective of demographics: Case study of Hubei, China, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 120:102917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102917

LI Y., QIAO L., WANG Q., DáVID K., 2020, Towards the evaluation of rural livability in China: Theoretical framework and empirical case study, Habitat International, 105: 102241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102241

LIANG Z., CHEN Y. P., GU Y., 2002, Rural Industrialisation and Internal Migration in China, Urban Studies, 39(12): 2175-2187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000033926

LIU J., BI H., WANG M., 2020, Using multi-source data to assess livability in Hong Kong at the community-based level: A combined subjectiveobjective approach, Geography and Sustainability, 1(4): 284-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.12.001

LIU Y., 2018, Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China, Acta Geographica Sinica, 73: 637-650.

LIU Y., LI Y., 2017, Revitalize the world’s countryside, Nature, 548(7667): 275-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/548275a

LIU Y., LONG H., CHEN Y., et al., 2016, Progress of research on urban-rural transformation and rural development in China in the past decade and future prospects, Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(8): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1318-8

-1132.

LONG H., WOODS M., 2011, Rural Restructuring under Globalization in Eastern Coastal China: What can we learn from Wales?, Journal of Rural and Community Development, 6: 70-94.

MATTSSON K. T., CASSEL S. H., 2020, Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Potentials for Path Creating Tourism Development in Rural Sweden, Tourism Planning & Development, 17(4): 384-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2019.1607543

MUSHTAHA E., ALSYOUF I., AL LABADI L., HAMAD R., KHATIB N., AL MUTAWA M., 2020, Application of AHP and a mathematical index to estimate livability in tourist districts: The case of Al Qasba in Sharjah, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(4): 872-889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2020.04.001

ONNOM W., TRIPATHI N., NITIVATTANANON V., NINSAWAT S., 2018, Development of a Liveable City Index (LCI) Using Multi Criteria Geospatial Modelling for Medium Class Cities in Developing Countries, Sustainability, 10(2): 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020520

OWUSU T. Y., 1998, To Buy or Not To Buy: Determinants of Home Ownership among Ghanaian Immigtants in Toronto, Canadian Geographer, 42(1):40-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1998.tb01551.x

QU Y., JIANG G., ZHAO Q., MA W., ZHANG R., YANG Y., 2017, Geographic identification, spatial differentiation, and formation mechanism of multifunction of rural settlements: A case study of 804 typical villages in Shandong Province, China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 166: 1202-1215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.120

STEINNES D. N., 1978, A simulataneous econometirc model of the intraurban location of employment and residence, Regional Science Perspectives, 8(2): 101-105.

TAN S., LI Y., SONG Y., et al., 2017, Influence factors on settlement intention for floating population in urban area: a China study, Quality & Quantity, 51(1): 147-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0299-5

TAO L., HUI E. C. M., WONG F. K. W., CHEN T., 2015, Housing choices of migrant workers in China: Beyond the Hukou perspective, Habitat International, 49: 474-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.06.018

WANG Y., JIN C., LU M., LU Y., 2017, Assessing the suitability of regional human settlements environment from a different preferences perspective: A case study of Zhejiang Province, China, Habitat International, 70: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.09.010

WANG Y., ZHU Y., YU M., 2019, Evaluation and determinants of satisfaction with rural livability in China’s less-developed eastern areas: A case study of Xianju County in Zhejiang Province, Ecological DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.054

Indicators, 104: 711-722.

WENG Y., ZENG Y., LIN W., 2021, Do rural highways narrow Chinese farmers’ income gap among provinces?, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4): 905-914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63374-3

WU J., YU Z., WEI Y. D., YANG L., 2019, Changing distribution of migrant population and its influencing factors in urban China: Economic transition, public policy, and amenities, Habitat International, 94: 102063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102063

YANG R., LIU Y., LONG H., QIAO L., 2015, Spatio-temporal characteristics of rural settlements and land use in the Bohai Rim of China, Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(5): 559-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-015-1187-6

YANG Y., BAO W., LIU Y., 2020, Coupling coordination analysis of rural production-living-ecological space in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Ecological Indicators, 117: 106512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106512

YI X., JUE W., HUAN H., 2021, Does economic development bring more livability? Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 293: 126187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126187

YUAN X., DU W., WEI X., YING Y., SHAO Y., HOU R., 2018, Quantitative analysis of research on China’s land transfer system, Land Use Policy, 74:301-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.038

YUAN Y., WANG M., ZHU Y., HUANG X., XIONG X., 2020, Urbanization’s effects on the urban-rural income gap in China: A meta-regression analysis, Land Use Policy, 99: 104995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104995

ZHAN D., KWAN M., ZHANG W., FAN J., YU J., DANG Y., 2018, Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China, Cities, 79:92-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025

ZHENG S., FU Y., LIU H., 2006, Housing-choice hindrances and urban spatial structure: Evidence from matched location and location-preference data in Chinese cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 60(3): 535-557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.05.003

ZHOU D., XU J., LIN Z., 2017, Conflict or coordination? Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis, Science of The Total Environment, 577: 136-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.143

ZHOU X., 2014, Increasing Returns to Education, Changing Labor Force Structure, and the Rise of Earnings Inequality in Urban China, 1996–2010, Social Forces, 93(2): 429-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou073

ZHOU Y., GUO Y., LIU Y., WU W., LI Y., 2018, Targeted poverty alleviation and land policy innovation: Some practice and policy implications from China, Land Use Policy, 74: 53-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.037

ZOU L., LIU Y., WANG J., YANG Y., 2021, An analysis of land use conflict potentials based on ecological-production-living function in the southeast coastal area of China, Ecological Indicators, 122:107297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107297

Mao, Y. ., & Li, N. (2022). Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.07

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income

Issue Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)

Archives

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

License

Downloads

Article Sidebar

Issue Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)

Archives

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

License

Downloads