Systematic Review on Urban Ecosystem Services in South-East Asia: Asean Countries
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)
-
The Efficiency of Health Systems in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the EU Countries
Tamara Rađenović, Vladimir Radivojević, Bojan Krstić, Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Živković7-15
-
Efficiency Assessment of Tax Measures in the European Countries Against the Effects of COVID-19
Daria Bilenko, Serhii Kozlovskyi, Natalya Ivanyuta, Viktoriia Baidala, Ruslan Lavrov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi16-22
-
Formation of Sustainable Investment Attractiveness of Regions Under the Conditions of COVID-19
Tetiana Polozova, Yurii Kutsenko, Oleksandra Kanova23-35
-
Going Green Supply Chain Management During COVID-19, Assessing the Best Supplier Selection Criteria: A Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Approach
Maryam Khokhar, Sayma Zia, Tahir Islam, Anshuman Sharma, Wasim Iqbal, Muhammad Irshad36-51
-
Empowering Theory of Poverty Reduction for Sustainable Development: Does the Welfare of Descendants Matter?
Juliusz Piwowarski, Larysa Yankovska, Bohdan-Petro Koshovyi, Ira Von-Nagy, Andrii Yevstakhevych52-63
-
Natural Resources in Function of Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Development of the EU Countries
Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Milićević, Bojan Krstić64-70
-
Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income
Yanling Mao, Na Li71-83
-
Sustainable Development and Religion. A European Perspective
Paweł Rydzewski84-95
-
Role of Religion in Environmental Sustainability: An Indian Perspective
Sarita Kar, Manisha Tripathy96-100
-
Analysis of Child Marriage and Related Policies in Indonesia: Sustainable Development Issue
Noverman Duadji, Novita Tresiana101-113
-
Inclusive Education as a Tool For Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals on the Basis of Humanization of Society
Oksana Zhukova, Larysa Platash, Liudmyla Tymchuk114-122
-
What is Right and What is Wrong in the Environmental Governance Model? Environmental Regulations for Improving Environmental Sustainability Ratings
Jajat S. Ardiwinata, Khalid Zaman, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Mohamed Haffar, Chairil Faif Pasani, Sriyanto Sriyanto123-139
-
Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Government Financial Expenditure on Environmental Protection: An SBM Super-efficiency Model Based on Undesired Outputs
Su Jialu, Ma Zhiqiang, Li Mingxing, Fredrick Oteng Agyeman, Zhu Yue140-150
-
Studies on Improving the Performance of Small and Micro Enterprises through Green Innovation
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu151-161
-
Possibilities of Developing Sustainable World by Introducing Bioeconomy: Global Perspective
Oleh V. Skydan, Maryna I. Yaremova, Liudmyla V. Tarasovych, Vitalii Ye. Dankevych, Nataliia M. Kutsmus162-170
-
Green Economy – Vector of Sustainable Development
Anar Ospanova, Iryna Popovychenko, Elena Chuprina171-181
-
Challenges for Improving Agricultural Resilience in the Context of Sustainability and Rural Development
Mangirdas Morkunas, Agnė Žičkienė, Tomas Baležentis, Artiom Volkov, Dalia Štreimikienė, Erika Ribašauskienė182-195
-
Time-Frequency Co-Movements Between Biomass Energy Consumption and Human Development in Brics Countries
Ngo Thai Hung196-210
-
Impact of the Agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union on the Competitiveness of the Agricultural Sector of the Member States
Saule S. Shintaeva, Alexandr A. Pyagay, Makhabbat K. Iskakova, Botagoz N. Naukenova, Saule T. Zhumasheva211-221
-
Air Pollution Regulations in China: A Policy Simulation Approach with Evolutionary Game
Zhaopeng Chu, Chen Bian, Jun Yang222-233
-
Feminist Mining: A Step Towards Sustainable Mininig in India
Priya Singh, Ajit Kumar Behura235-245
-
Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment and Sustainable Agriculture in Africa
Ping Ju, Muhammad Khalid Anser, Romanus Osabohien, Onyinye Ochuba, Rolle Remi Ahuru, Junaid Ashraf246-255
-
Systematic Review on Urban Ecosystem Services in South-East Asia: Asean Countries
Nur Shazwanie Rosehan, Azlan Abas, Kadaruddin Aiyub256-266
-
Financial Development and Sustainable Competitiveness in Arctic Region: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis
Farzan Yahya, Ghulam Abbas, Muhammad Hussain, Muhammad Waqas267-278
-
Green Energy in the Caribbean: Influence on Toursim and Economic Development
Tatiana Tazikhina, Vladimir Kvasha, Yulia Solovova, Igbal Guliev279-287
-
Samkhya Philosophy, Deep Ecology and Sustainable Development
Nanda Gopal Biswas, Gyan Prakash288-292
-
Reproduction of Human Capital as a Strategic Priority for Sustainable Development of Regions
Olena Krasnonosova, Daria Mykhailenko, Ihor Yaroshenko293-300
-
Environmental Aspects of the European Experience in Landscape Planning
Bao Yu, Jianmei Wang, Ya Li301-309
Archives
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
Urban ecosystem services refer to all the benefits of nature especially to the urban community and economy for maintaining human well-being. This concept links to the economic, community and environmental aspects and shows how nature conservation is important for human and economic principles. However, the view of urban ecosystem services assessment based on essential categories with current urban development is provided. So, this paper reviews the aim to analyze the types and assessing the categories of urban ecosystem services and the methodological used in ASEAN countries. Furthermore, understanding studies about urban ecosystem services are important in long-term studies for monitoring purpose. As a result, 8 out of 10 ASEAN countries excluding Laos and Brunei have studied urban ecosystem services. In this context, the result also shows the most studies specify the significance of the ecosystem services given by the urban as regulating (waste absorption, climate regulation, water purification, flood regulation, and disease control) and followed by cultural (tranquility, social relations, and recreation). Thus, exploring urban ecosystem interaction in current ASEAN countries may have added benefits in terms of improving the urban ecosystem services to streamline the urban area planning. Finally, we conclude that all the ASEAN countries should play an important role to make sure the countries maintain sustainable and more livable with the right policies and guidelines like can fit in Paris Agreement especially in Climate Strategies and plans.
Keywords:
References
ABAS A., AIYUB K., IDRIS N.A., 2020, Systematic review on ecosystem services (Es) of ecotourism in south-east Asia (Asean), Problemy Ekorozwoju. Problems of Sustaiable Development, 16(1): 113-122, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.1.12.
ACHMADA A., HASYIM H., DAHLAN B., AULIAD D.N., 2015, Modeling of urban growth in tsunami-prone city using logistic regression: Analysis of Banda Aceh, Indonesia, Applied Geography, 62: 237-246.
AHERN J. 2007, Green infrastructure for cities: The spatial dimension. Conference Cities of the Future: Towards Integrated Sustainable Water and Landscape Management, IWA Publishing.
ARIFIN, H.S., NAKAGOSHI, N., 2011, Landscape ecology and urban biodiversity in tropical Indonesian cities, Landscape Ecol Eng, 7: 33-43.
BAHARUDDIN Z.M., RUSLI F.N., OTHMAN R., 2014, Kuala Lumpur Urban Biodiversity: Birds Community in Urban Public Parks, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Policy, 3(6):146-159.
BUENO E.A., ANCHOG R., OBALAN E., CERO A.D., SIMON A.N., MALVECINO-MACALINTAL M.R., BACTONGJR M., LUNAR J., BUENA G.R., SUGUI L., 2016, Measuring Households’ Willingness to Pay for Water Quality Restoration of a Natural Urban Lake in the Philippines, Environmental Process, 3(4): 875-89.
CHALLCHAROEN, WATTANA A., PHARINO C., 2016, Wishing to finance a recycling program? Willingness-to-pay study for enhancing municipal solid waste recycling in urban settlements in Thailand, Habitat International, 51: 23-30.
CLARK K.H., NICHOLAS K.A., 2013, Introducing urban food forestry: a multifunctional approach to increase food security and provide ecosystem services, Landscape Ecology, 28(9): 1649-1669.
COSTANZA R., D’ARGE R., DE GROOT R., FARBER S., GRASSO M., HANNON B., LIMBURG K., NAEEM S., O’NEILL RV., PARUELO J., RASKIN RG., SUTTON P., VANDENBELT M., 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature International Journal of Science, 387:253-260.
DANIELAINI T.T., MAHESHWARI B., HAGARE D., 2018, Defining rural-urban interfaces for understanding ecohydrological processes in West Java, Indonesia: Part I. Development of methodologytodelineate peri-urban areas, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 18: 22-36.
DAVIES G.L., MCIVER L., KIM Y., HASHIZUME M., IDDINGS S., CHAN V., 2015, Water-Borne Diseases and Extreme Weather Events in Cambodia: Review of Impacts and Implications of Climate Change, International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 12(1): 191-213.
DEPIETRI Y., RENAUD F.G., KALLIS G., 2013, Heat waves and floods in urban areas: a policy-oriented review of ecosystem services, Sustainability Science, 7(1): 95-107.
DOUGLAS I., 2012, Urban ecology and urban ecosystems: understanding the links to human health and well-being, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(4): 385-392.
EL-BAGHDADI O., DESHA C., 2016, Conceptualising a biophilic services model for urban areas, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 27: 399-408.
ELMQVIST T., SETALA H., HANDEL S.N., VAN DER PLOEG S., ARONSON J., BLIGNAUT J.N., E GOMEZ-BAGGETHUN E., NOWAK D.J., KRONENBERG J., DE GROOT R., 2015, Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14: 101-108.
ESTOQUE R.C., MURAYAMA Y., 2012, Examining the potential impact of land use/cover changes on the ecosystem services of Baguio city, the Philippines: A scenario-based analysis, Applied Geography, 35(1-2): 316-326.
EUROPEAN UNION, 2015, Think tank, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank.
FRIES D.A., 2017, Singapore as a long-term case study for tropical urban ecosystem services, Urban Ecosystems, 20(2): 277-291.
FRIESS D.A., RICHARDS D.R., PHANG V.X.H., 2016, Mangrove forests store high densities of carbon across the tropical urban landscape of Singapore, Urban Ecosystems, 19(2): 795-810.
FRIESS D.A., 2016. Singapore as a long-term case study for tropical urban ecosystem services, Urban Ecosystems, 20(2): 277-291.
GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN E., GREN Å., BARTON D., LANGEMEYER J., MCPHEARSON T., O’FARRELL P., ANDERSSON E., HAMSTEAD Z., KREMER P., 2013, Urban Ecosystem Services, Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities, eds. Elmqvist T., Fragikas M., Goodness J., Guneralp B., Marcotullio P., McDonald R., Parnell S., Schwenius M., Sendstad M., Seto K., Wilkinson C., Springer Netherlands: 755, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1.
GUTMAN P., 2007, Ecosystem services: foundations for a new rural–urban compact, Ecol. Econ, 62 (3-4): 383-387, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.027.
HAASE D., LARONDELLE N., ANDERSSON E., ARTMANN M., BORGSTROM S., BREUSTE J., GOMEZ-BAGGETHUN E., GREN A., HAMSTEAD Z., HANSEN R., KABISCH N., KREMER P., LANGEMEYER J., RALL EL., MCPHEARSON T., PAULEIT S., QURESHI S., SCHWARZ N., VOIGT A., WURSTER D., ELMQVIST T., 2014, A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation, AMBIO, 43: 413-433.
HEATHER Z.D., 2006, Indigenous ecotourism: Sustainable development and management, H. Zeppel.
INTASEN M., HAUER R., WERNER L., LARSEN E., 2016, Urban Forest Assessment in Bangkok, Thailand. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 36(2).
INVESTOPEDIA, Asean, 2017, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/asean.asp.
ISLAM R., SIWAR C., 2012, The Analysis of Urban Agriculture Development in Malaysia, Advances in Environmental Biology, 6(3): 1068-1078.
JANSSON Å., 2013, Reaching for a sustainable, resilient urban future using the lens of ecosystem services, Ecol. Econ., 86: 285-291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.013.
KARUPPANNAN S., BAHARUDDIN Z.M., SIVAM A., DANIELS C.B., 2014, Urban Green Space and Urban Biodiversity: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(1): 1-16.
KOYADUN S., BUTRAPORN P., KITTAYAPONG P., 2012, Ecologic and Sociodemographic Risk Determinants for Dengue Transmission in Urban Areas in Thailand, Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases.
LI X.X., NORFORD L.K., 2016, Evaluation of cool roof and vegetations in mitigating urban heat island in a tropical city, Singapore, Urban Climate, 16: 59-74.
LIZUKA K., JOHNSON B.A, ONISHI, A., MAGCALE-MACANDOG D.B., ENDO, I., BRAGIS M., 2017, Modeling Future Urban Sprawl and Landscape Change in the Laguna de Bay Area, Philippines, Land, 6(2): 1-21.
MAHAZAR A., OTHMAN M.S., KUTTY A.A., MOHAMED DESA M.N., 2013, Monitoring Urban River Water Quality Using Macroinvertebrate and Physio-Chemical Parameters: Case study of Penchala River, Malaysia, Journal of Biological Sciences, 13(6): 1-9.
MCGEE T.G., 2010, Building liveable cities in Asia in the twenty-first century research and policy challenges for the urban future of Asia, Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 11(1): 14-28.
MCGRANAHAN G., MARCOTULLIO P., BAI X., BALK D., BRAGA T., DOUGLAS I., ZLOTNIK H., 2005, Urban Systems, Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Current State and Trends, eds. Hassan R., Scholes R., Ash N., Oxford University Press, Oxford: 795-825.
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT (MEA), 2005, Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Synthesis Report, Island Press, Washington, DC.
MOHRI H., LAHOTI S., SAITO O., MAHALINGAM A., GUNATILLEKE N., IRHAM HOANG V.T., HITINIYAKE G., TAKEUCHI K., HERATH S., 2013, Assessment of ecosystem services in homegarden systems in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam, Ecosystem Services, 5: 124-136.
MÜLLER F., BURKHARD B., 2012, The indicator side of ecosystem services, Ecosystem Services, 1(1): 26-30.
NATH T.K., HAN S.S.Z., LECHNER A.M., 2018, Urban green space and well-being in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 36: 34-41.
NEWMAN P., 2014, Biophilic urbanism: a case study on Singapore, Australian Planner, 51(1): 47-65.
PHAM V.C., PHAM T.T.H., TONG T.H.A., NGUYEN T.T.H., PHAM N.H., 2014, The conversion of agricultural land in the peri-urban areas of Hanoi (Vietnam): patterns in space and time, Journal of Land Use Science, 10(2): 224-242.
SAADATIAN O., HAW, L.C., MAT S., SOPIAN K., 2012, Perspective of Sustainable Development in Malaysia, International Journal of Energy and Environment, 2(6): 260-267.
SCARANO FR., 2017, Ecosystem-based Adaptation to Climate Change: Concept, Scalability and a Role for Conservation Science, Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15: 65-73.
SCHEWENIUS M., MCPHEARSON T., ELMQVIST T., 2014, Opportunities for Increasing Resilience and Sustainability of Urban Social–Ecological Systems: Insights from the URBES and the Cities and Biodiversity Outlook Projects, AMBIO, 43(4): 434-444.
SHAY-WEI C., HAN-HWA G. 2016, A Proposed Urban Environmental Sustainability Indicators Framework: The Case of Malaysia, Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics, 13: 522-528.
SILVA, J.D., KERNAGHAN S., LUQUE A., 2012, A systems approach to meeting the challenges of urban climate change, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 4(2): 125-145.
SPRINGATE-BAGINSKI O., THEIN A.K., NEIL A. THU M.W., DOHERTY, F., 2014, Democratising timber: An assessment of Myanmar's emerging ‘Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade’ (FLEGT) process, Forest Policy and Economics, 48(1): 33-45.
SUWARNO D., LÖHR A., KROEZE C., WIDIANARKO B., 2014, Fast increases in urban sewage inputs to rivers of Indonesia, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16(5): 1077-1096.
TAN P.Y., ISMAIL M.Z., 2014, Building shade affects light environment and urban greenery in highdensity residential estates in Singapore, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(4): 771-784.
THIAGARAJAH J., WONG S.K.M., RICHARDS D.R., FRIESS D.A., 2015, Historical and contemporary cultural ecosystem service values in the rapidly urbanizing city state of Singapore, Ambio, 44(7): 666-677.
TRATALOS J., FULLER R.A., WARREN P.H., DAVIES R.G., GASTON K.J., 2007, Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services, Landscape and Urban Planning,. 83: 308-317.
UY N., & SHAW R., 2013, Ecosystem Resilience and Community Values: Implications to EcosystemBased Adaptation, Journal of Disaster Research, 8(1): 201-202.
VINCENT L., MICHEL L., CATHERINE C., PAULINE R., 2014, The energy cost of water independence: the case of Singapore, Water Science and Technology, 787-794.
VIVITHKEYOONVONGA S., JOURDAIN D., 2016, Willingness to pay for ecosystem services provided by irrigated agriculture in Northeast Thailand,
International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 13(1): 14-26.
VOLLMER D., RYFFEL A.N., DJAJA K., GRETREGAMEY A., 2016, Examining Demand for Urban River Rehabilitation in Indonesia: Insights from A Spatially Explicit Discrete Choice Experiment, Land Use Policy, 57: 514-525.
YANG Y.C.E., PASSARELLI S., LOVELL R.J., RINGLER C., 2018, Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review, Ecosystem Services, 31: 58-67.
YEN Y., WANG Z., SHI Y., SOEUNG B., 2016, An Assessment of the Knowledge and Demand of Young Residents regarding the Ecological Services of Urban
Green Spaces in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, Sustainability, 8(6): 523.
YEN Y., WANG Z., SHI Y., XU F., SOEUNG B., SOHAIL M.T., RUBAKULA G., JUMA S.A., 2017, The predictors of the behavioral intention to the use of urban green spaces: The perspectives of young residents in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, Habitat International, 64: 98-108.
YULE, C.M., GAN J.Y., JINGGUT T., LEE K.V., 2015, Urbanization affects food webs and leaf-litter decomposition in a tropical stream in Malaysia, Freshwater Science, 34(2): 702-715.
ZIEGLER AD., SHE LH., TANTASARIN C., JACHOWSKI NR., WASSON R., 2012, Floods, false hope, and the future, Hydrological Processes, 26: 1748-1750.
Article Details
Abstract views: 554
Downloads: 164
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
