Corporate Sustainability Practices in Polluting Industries: Evidence from India, China and USA
Prem Sagar Mishra
Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)
Ajay Kumar
Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)
Niladri Das
Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)
Abstract
In recent years, the tilt of the corporate world towards non-financial reporting can be clearly seen from traditional accounting practices. Sustainability reporting disclosures are an important tool for providing information about the environmental and social performance of companies to their various stakeholders. From a financial perspective, for any firm, there is always a possibility of reporting more of the information that favours their interests or conceal that which is not in their favour. This study evaluates the annual and sustainability reports of 380 Indian, 400 Chinese and 400 USA companies from five highly polluting industries on the basis of GRI (global reporting initiatives) guidelines. From the result, it is inferred that the findings are consistent with the legitimacy theory. The result shows that the profitability and capital structure of firms in the sample do not affect the sustainability reporting practices significantly. In addition, larger firms have a tendency to disclose more information in their annual and sustainability reports than smaller firms.
Keywords:
environmental management, sustainability reporting, polluting industries, sustainability accounting, legitimacy theoryReferences
ADAMS C., NARAYANAN V., 2007, The standardization of sustainability reporting, in: Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, ed. Unerman J., Bebbington J., O’Dwyer B., Routledge, London and New York, p. 70-85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/NOE0415384889.ch4
Google Scholar
AKISIK O., GAL G., 2014, Financial performance and reviews of corporate social responsibility reports, in: Journal of Management Control, 25(3-4), p. 259-288.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-014-0198-2
Google Scholar
AUPPERLE G., CARROL A., HATFIELD J., 1985, An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability, in: Academy of Management Journal, 22, p. 501-515.
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., HOFFMAN A. J., 2012, The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199584451.001.0001
Google Scholar
BEBBINGTON J., LARRINAGA C., 2014, Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), p. 395-413.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003
Google Scholar
BEBBINGTON J., LARRINAGA C., MONEVA J. M., 2008, Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management, in: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(3), p. 337-361.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863932
Google Scholar
BEBBINGTON J., UNERMAN J., O’DWYER, B., 2014, Sustainability accounting and accountability, Routledge, Abingdon.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848419
Google Scholar
BEWLEY K., LI Y., 2000, Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: a voluntary disclosure perspective, in: Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 1, p. 201-226.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3598(00)01011-6
Google Scholar
BRAMMERS., PAVELINS., 2008, Factorsinfluencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure, in: Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, p. 120-136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.506
Google Scholar
BRANCO M., RODRIGUES L., 2008, Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 83, p. 68-701
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z
Google Scholar
BURRITT R. J., TINGEY-HOLIOYAK J., 2012, Forging cleaner production: the importance of academic-practitioner links for successful sustainability embedded carbon accounting, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 36 (1) , p. 39-47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.001
Google Scholar
CAMPBELL J. L., 2007, Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility, in: Academy of Management Review, 32(3), p. 946-967.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
Google Scholar
CHEN J. C., ROBERTS R. W., 2010, Towards a more integrated understanding of the organizationsociety relationship: Implications for social and environmental accounting research, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), p. 651-665.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0531-0
Google Scholar
CHEN S., BOUVAIN P., 2009, Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0818-1_21
Google Scholar
Germany, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 87, p. 299-317.
Google Scholar
CLARKSON P. M., LI Y., RICHARDSON G. D., VASVARI F. P., 2008, Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(5), p. 303-327.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
Google Scholar
COLI M., NISSI E., RAPPOSELLI A., 2011, Monitoring environmental efficiency: an application to Italian provinces, in: Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(1), p. 38-43.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.07.004
Google Scholar
DEEGAN C., BLOMQUIST C., 2006, Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4-5), p. 343-372.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.04.001
Google Scholar
DYLLICK T, HOCKERTS K., 2002, Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability, in: Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, p. 130-141.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
Google Scholar
ECCLES R., IOANNOU I., SERAFEIM G., 2012, The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance, in: Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w17950
Google Scholar
ELKINGTON J., 2002, The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st Century, Oxford Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
FIELDS T.D., LYS T.Z., VINCENT L, 2001, Empirical research on accounting choice, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, p. 255-307.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3
Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, in: Corporate social responsibility. Volume 1: theories and concepts of corporate social responsibility, eds. Crane A, Matten D, Sage Publications, London, p. 69-74.
Google Scholar
FROOMAN J., 1999, Stakeholder influence strategies, in: The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), p. 191-205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893928
Google Scholar
GAMERSCHLAG R., MÖLLER K., VERBEETEN F., 2011, Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany, in: Review of Managerial Science, 5 (23), p. 233-262.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3
Google Scholar
GAVANA G., GOTTARDO P., MOISELLO A.M., 2017, Sustainability Reporting in Family Firms: A Panel Data Analysis, in: Sustainability, 9, p. 38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010038
Google Scholar
GODHA A., JAIN P., 2015, Sustainability reporting trend in Indian companies as per GRI framework: a comparative study, in: South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 4(1), p. 62-73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2277977915574040
Google Scholar
GOMEZ-MEJIA L.R., HAYNES K.T., NUNEZNICKEL M., JACOBSON K.J.L., MOYANOFUENTES J., 2007, Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, p. 106-137.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Google Scholar
GOND J.P., GRUBNIC S., HERZING C., MOON J., 2012, Configuring management control systems: theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability, in: Management Accounting Research, 23(3), p. 205-223.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003
Google Scholar
GRAY R., 2010, Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), p. 47-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
Google Scholar
GRAY R., KOUHY R., LAVERS S., 1995, Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), p. 47-71.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510146996
Google Scholar
GRI, 2013, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/GRI-amongthe-most-popular-CSR-instruments.aspx (13.09.2017).
Google Scholar
GRI, 2009, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Sustainability-Report-2009-2010.pdf (30.09.2017).
Google Scholar
HANIFFA R.M., COOKE T.E., 2005, The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting, in: Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, p.391-430.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001
Google Scholar
HENRI J., BOIRAL O., ROY M.J., 2013, The tracking of environmental costs: motivations and impacts, in: European Accounting Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2013.837400.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2013.837400
Google Scholar
HUSTED B.W., SALZAR J., 2006, Taking Friedman seriously: maximizing profits and social performance, in: Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), p. 75-91.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x
Google Scholar
IPPC (INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE), 2014, IPCC fifth assessment synthesis report, https://www.ipcc.ch, (13.09.2017).
Google Scholar
ISLAM M. A., DEEGAN C., 2010, Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance: a case study of two Global clothing and sports retail companies, in: Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), p. 131-148.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2010.9663388
Google Scholar
IYER V., LULSEGED A., 2013, Does family status impact US firms’ sustainability reporting?, in: Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4, p. 163-189.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-Nov-2011-0032
Google Scholar
JACKSON T., 2009, Prosperity without growth, Earthscan, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774338
Google Scholar
KALM M., GOMEZ-MEJIA L.R., 2016, Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms, in: Revista de Administração, 51, p. 409-411.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.08.002
Google Scholar
KAUR A., SHARMA P.C., 2017, Environment Development Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9961-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9961-5
Google Scholar
KOLK A., 2005, Environmental reporting by multinationals from the Triad: convergence or divergence, in: Management International Review, 45(1), p. 145-166.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91005-9_9
Google Scholar
KUMAR A., DAS N., 2018, Sustainability Reporting Practices in Emerging Economies: A Cross-Country Study of BRICS Nations, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, 13(2), p. 17-25.
Google Scholar
KOTHARI A., 2013, Development and ecological sustainability in India: Possibilities for Post-2015 framework, in: Oxfam India working paper series, http://www.environmentportal.in/files/file/development%20and%20ecological%20sustainability%20in%20india.pdf (15.05.2016).
Google Scholar
KUOSMANEN T., KUOSMANEN N., 2009, How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might), in: Ecological Economics, 69(2), p. 235-243.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.008
Google Scholar
LAINE M., 2010, Towards sustaining status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish corporate disclosures 1987-2005, in: European Accounting Review, 19(2), p. 247-274.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180903136258
Google Scholar
LINDBLOM C. K., 1993, The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure, in: The critical perspectives on accounting conference, New York.
Google Scholar
LOH L., THOMAS T., WANG Y., 2017, Sustainability Reporting and Firm Value: Evidence from Singapore-Listed Companies, in: Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112112.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112112
Google Scholar
MALSCH B., 2013, Politicizing the expertise of the accounting industry in the realm of corporate social responsibility, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(2), p. 149-168.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.09.003
Google Scholar
MANI V., GUNASEKARAN A., PAPADOPOULOS T., HAZEN B., DUBEY R., 2016, Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from India, in: Resources Conservation and Recycling, 111, p. 42-52.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.003
Google Scholar
MCWILLIAMS A., SIEGEL D., 2001, Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective, in: The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), p. 117-127.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987
Google Scholar
MEBRATU D., 1998, Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Historical and Conceptual Review, in: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18, p. 493-520.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
Google Scholar
MILNE M. J., 2002, Positive accounting theory, political costs and social disclosure analyses: a critical look, in: Critical Perspect Account, 13, p. 369-395.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2001.0509
Google Scholar
MILNE M. J., GRAY R., 2013, W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the Global Reporting Initiative and corporate sustainability reporting, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), p. 13-29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
Google Scholar
MILNE M., TREGIDGA H., WALTON S., 2009, Words not actions! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(8), p. 1211-1257.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910999292
Google Scholar
MUNDA G., SAISANA M., 2011, Methodological considerations on regional sustainability assessment based on multicriteria and sensitivity analysis, in: Regional Studies, 45(2), p. 261-276.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003713316
Google Scholar
OWEN D. L., 2008, Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), p: 240-267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810854428
Google Scholar
PARKER L. D., 2005, Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), p. 842-860.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570510627739
Google Scholar
PARRIS T. M., KATES R. W., 2003, Characterizing and measuring sustainable development, in: Annual Review of environment and resources, 28(1), p. 559-586.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551
Google Scholar
PERES-NETO P. R., LEGENDRE P., DRAY S., BORCARD, D., 2006, Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions, in: Ecology, 87(10), p. 2614-2625.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2
Google Scholar
ROCKSTRÖM J., STEFFEN W., NOONE K., PERSSON Å., CHAPIN III F.S., LAMBIN E.F., LENTON T.M., SCHEFFER M., FOLKE C., SCHELLNHUBER H.J., NYKVIST B., 2009, A safe
Google Scholar
operating space for humanity, in: Nature, 461(7263), p. 472.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
Google Scholar
RODRIGUE M., MAGNAN M., & CHO C. H., 2013, Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical examination, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), p. 107-129.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1331-5
Google Scholar
SODHI M.S., 2015, Conceptualizing social responsibility in operations via stakeholder resource‐based view, in: Production and Operations Management, 24(9), p. 1375-1389.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12393
Google Scholar
SPAR D., LAMURE L., 2003, The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business, in: California Management Review, 45(3), p. 78-101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166177
Google Scholar
SPENCE C., 2009, Social accounting’s emancipatory potential, in: Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), p. 205-227.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.06.003
Google Scholar
SUCHMAN M. C., 1995, Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches, in: Academy of Management Review, 20(3), p. 571-610.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Google Scholar
TANG C. S., ZHOU S., 2012, Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations, in: European Journal of Operational Research, 223(3), p. 585-594.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.030
Google Scholar
TREGIDGA H., MILNE M., KEARINS K., 2014, (Re)presenting ‘sustainable organizations’, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), p. 477-494.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.10.006
Google Scholar
TYTECA D.,1998, Sustainability indicators at the firm level, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), p. 61-77.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.4.61
Google Scholar
WATTS R.L., ZIMMERMANN J.L., 1990, Positive accounting theory: a ten year perspective, in: Account Review, 65(1), p. 131-156.
Google Scholar
WINFIELD M., GIBSON R. B., MARKVART T., GAUDREAU K., TAYLOR J., 2010, Implications of sustainability assessment for electricity system design: The case of the Ontario Power Authority‘s integrated power system plan, in: Energy Policy, 38(8), p. 4115-4126.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.038
Google Scholar
ZIENTARA P., 2015 Socioemotional wealth and corporate social responsibility: A critical analysis, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), p. 185-199.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2848-1
Google Scholar
ZHOU H., YANG Y., CHEN Y., ZHU J., 2017, Data Envelopment Analysis Application in Sustainability: The Origins, Development and Future Directions, in: European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), p. 1-16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.023
Google Scholar
Authors
Prem Sagar MishraDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India
Authors
Ajay KumarDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India
Authors
Niladri DasDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India
Statistics
Abstract views: 51PDF downloads: 22
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.