Corporate Sustainability Practices in Polluting Industries: Evidence from India, China and USA

Prem Sagar Mishra


Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)

Ajay Kumar


Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)

Niladri Das


Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)

Abstract

In recent years, the tilt of the corporate world towards non-financial reporting can be clearly seen from traditional accounting practices. Sustainability reporting disclosures are an important tool for providing information about the environmental and social performance of companies to their various stakeholders. From a financial perspective, for any firm, there is always a possibility of reporting more of the information that favours their interests or conceal that which is not in their favour. This study evaluates the annual and sustainability reports of 380 Indian, 400 Chinese and 400 USA companies from five highly polluting industries on the basis of GRI (global reporting initiatives) guidelines. From the result, it is inferred that the findings are consistent with the legitimacy theory. The result shows that the profitability and capital structure of firms in the sample do not affect the sustainability reporting practices significantly. In addition, larger firms have a tendency to disclose more information in their annual and sustainability reports than smaller firms.


Keywords:

environmental management, sustainability reporting, polluting industries, sustainability accounting, legitimacy theory

ADAMS C., NARAYANAN V., 2007, The standardization of sustainability reporting, in: Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, ed. Unerman J., Bebbington J., O’Dwyer B., Routledge, London and New York, p. 70-85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/NOE0415384889.ch4   Google Scholar

AKISIK O., GAL G., 2014, Financial performance and reviews of corporate social responsibility reports, in: Journal of Management Control, 25(3-4), p. 259-288.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-014-0198-2   Google Scholar

AUPPERLE G., CARROL A., HATFIELD J., 1985, An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability, in: Academy of Management Journal, 22, p. 501-515.
  Google Scholar

BANSAL P., HOFFMAN A. J., 2012, The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199584451.001.0001   Google Scholar

BEBBINGTON J., LARRINAGA C., 2014, Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), p. 395-413.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003   Google Scholar

BEBBINGTON J., LARRINAGA C., MONEVA J. M., 2008, Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management, in: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(3), p. 337-361.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863932   Google Scholar

BEBBINGTON J., UNERMAN J., O’DWYER, B., 2014, Sustainability accounting and accountability, Routledge, Abingdon.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848419   Google Scholar

BEWLEY K., LI Y., 2000, Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: a voluntary disclosure perspective, in: Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 1, p. 201-226.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3598(00)01011-6   Google Scholar

BRAMMERS., PAVELINS., 2008, Factorsinfluencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure, in: Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, p. 120-136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.506   Google Scholar

BRANCO M., RODRIGUES L., 2008, Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 83, p. 68-701
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z   Google Scholar

BURRITT R. J., TINGEY-HOLIOYAK J., 2012, Forging cleaner production: the importance of academic-practitioner links for successful sustainability embedded carbon accounting, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 36 (1) , p. 39-47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.001   Google Scholar

CAMPBELL J. L., 2007, Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility, in: Academy of Management Review, 32(3), p. 946-967.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684   Google Scholar

CHEN J. C., ROBERTS R. W., 2010, Towards a more integrated understanding of the organizationsociety relationship: Implications for social and environmental accounting research, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), p. 651-665.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0531-0   Google Scholar

CHEN S., BOUVAIN P., 2009, Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0818-1_21   Google Scholar

Germany, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 87, p. 299-317.
  Google Scholar

CLARKSON P. M., LI Y., RICHARDSON G. D., VASVARI F. P., 2008, Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(5), p. 303-327.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003   Google Scholar

COLI M., NISSI E., RAPPOSELLI A., 2011, Monitoring environmental efficiency: an application to Italian provinces, in: Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(1), p. 38-43.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.07.004   Google Scholar

DEEGAN C., BLOMQUIST C., 2006, Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4-5), p. 343-372.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.04.001   Google Scholar

DYLLICK T, HOCKERTS K., 2002, Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability, in: Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, p. 130-141.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323   Google Scholar

ECCLES R., IOANNOU I., SERAFEIM G., 2012, The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance, in: Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w17950   Google Scholar

ELKINGTON J., 2002, The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st Century, Oxford Press, Oxford.
  Google Scholar

FIELDS T.D., LYS T.Z., VINCENT L, 2001, Empirical research on accounting choice, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, p. 255-307.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3   Google Scholar

FRIEDMAN, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, in: Corporate social responsibility. Volume 1: theories and concepts of corporate social responsibility, eds. Crane A, Matten D, Sage Publications, London, p. 69-74.
  Google Scholar

FROOMAN J., 1999, Stakeholder influence strategies, in: The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), p. 191-205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893928   Google Scholar

GAMERSCHLAG R., MÖLLER K., VERBEETEN F., 2011, Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany, in: Review of Managerial Science, 5 (23), p. 233-262.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3   Google Scholar

GAVANA G., GOTTARDO P., MOISELLO A.M., 2017, Sustainability Reporting in Family Firms: A Panel Data Analysis, in: Sustainability, 9, p. 38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010038   Google Scholar

GODHA A., JAIN P., 2015, Sustainability reporting trend in Indian companies as per GRI framework: a comparative study, in: South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 4(1), p. 62-73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2277977915574040   Google Scholar

GOMEZ-MEJIA L.R., HAYNES K.T., NUNEZNICKEL M., JACOBSON K.J.L., MOYANOFUENTES J., 2007, Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, p. 106-137.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106   Google Scholar

GOND J.P., GRUBNIC S., HERZING C., MOON J., 2012, Configuring management control systems: theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability, in: Management Accounting Research, 23(3), p. 205-223.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003   Google Scholar

GRAY R., 2010, Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), p. 47-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006   Google Scholar

GRAY R., KOUHY R., LAVERS S., 1995, Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), p. 47-71.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510146996   Google Scholar

GRI, 2013, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/GRI-amongthe-most-popular-CSR-instruments.aspx (13.09.2017).
  Google Scholar

GRI, 2009, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Sustainability-Report-2009-2010.pdf (30.09.2017).
  Google Scholar

HANIFFA R.M., COOKE T.E., 2005, The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting, in: Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24, p.391-430.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001   Google Scholar

HENRI J., BOIRAL O., ROY M.J., 2013, The tracking of environmental costs: motivations and impacts, in: European Accounting Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2013.837400.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2013.837400   Google Scholar

HUSTED B.W., SALZAR J., 2006, Taking Friedman seriously: maximizing profits and social performance, in: Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), p. 75-91.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x   Google Scholar

IPPC (INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE), 2014, IPCC fifth assessment synthesis report, https://www.ipcc.ch, (13.09.2017).
  Google Scholar

ISLAM M. A., DEEGAN C., 2010, Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance: a case study of two Global clothing and sports retail companies, in: Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), p. 131-148.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2010.9663388   Google Scholar

IYER V., LULSEGED A., 2013, Does family status impact US firms’ sustainability reporting?, in: Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4, p. 163-189.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-Nov-2011-0032   Google Scholar

JACKSON T., 2009, Prosperity without growth, Earthscan, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774338   Google Scholar

KALM M., GOMEZ-MEJIA L.R., 2016, Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms, in: Revista de Administração, 51, p. 409-411.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.08.002   Google Scholar

KAUR A., SHARMA P.C., 2017, Environment Development Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9961-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9961-5   Google Scholar

KOLK A., 2005, Environmental reporting by multinationals from the Triad: convergence or divergence, in: Management International Review, 45(1), p. 145-166.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91005-9_9   Google Scholar

KUMAR A., DAS N., 2018, Sustainability Reporting Practices in Emerging Economies: A Cross-Country Study of BRICS Nations, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, 13(2), p. 17-25.
  Google Scholar

KOTHARI A., 2013, Development and ecological sustainability in India: Possibilities for Post-2015 framework, in: Oxfam India working paper series, http://www.environmentportal.in/files/file/development%20and%20ecological%20sustainability%20in%20india.pdf (15.05.2016).
  Google Scholar

KUOSMANEN T., KUOSMANEN N., 2009, How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might), in: Ecological Economics, 69(2), p. 235-243.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.008   Google Scholar

LAINE M., 2010, Towards sustaining status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish corporate disclosures 1987-2005, in: European Accounting Review, 19(2), p. 247-274.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180903136258   Google Scholar

LINDBLOM C. K., 1993, The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure, in: The critical perspectives on accounting conference, New York.
  Google Scholar

LOH L., THOMAS T., WANG Y., 2017, Sustainability Reporting and Firm Value: Evidence from Singapore-Listed Companies, in: Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112112.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112112   Google Scholar

MALSCH B., 2013, Politicizing the expertise of the accounting industry in the realm of corporate social responsibility, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(2), p. 149-168.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.09.003   Google Scholar

MANI V., GUNASEKARAN A., PAPADOPOULOS T., HAZEN B., DUBEY R., 2016, Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from India, in: Resources Conservation and Recycling, 111, p. 42-52.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.003   Google Scholar

MCWILLIAMS A., SIEGEL D., 2001, Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective, in: The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), p. 117-127.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987   Google Scholar

MEBRATU D., 1998, Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Historical and Conceptual Review, in: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18, p. 493-520.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5   Google Scholar

MILNE M. J., 2002, Positive accounting theory, political costs and social disclosure analyses: a critical look, in: Critical Perspect Account, 13, p. 369-395.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2001.0509   Google Scholar

MILNE M. J., GRAY R., 2013, W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the Global Reporting Initiative and corporate sustainability reporting, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), p. 13-29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8   Google Scholar

MILNE M., TREGIDGA H., WALTON S., 2009, Words not actions! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(8), p. 1211-1257.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910999292   Google Scholar

MUNDA G., SAISANA M., 2011, Methodological considerations on regional sustainability assessment based on multicriteria and sensitivity analysis, in: Regional Studies, 45(2), p. 261-276.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003713316   Google Scholar

OWEN D. L., 2008, Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), p: 240-267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810854428   Google Scholar

PARKER L. D., 2005, Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), p. 842-860.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570510627739   Google Scholar

PARRIS T. M., KATES R. W., 2003, Characterizing and measuring sustainable development, in: Annual Review of environment and resources, 28(1), p. 559-586.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551   Google Scholar

PERES-NETO P. R., LEGENDRE P., DRAY S., BORCARD, D., 2006, Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions, in: Ecology, 87(10), p. 2614-2625.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2   Google Scholar

ROCKSTRÖM J., STEFFEN W., NOONE K., PERSSON Å., CHAPIN III F.S., LAMBIN E.F., LENTON T.M., SCHEFFER M., FOLKE C., SCHELLNHUBER H.J., NYKVIST B., 2009, A safe
  Google Scholar

operating space for humanity, in: Nature, 461(7263), p. 472.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a   Google Scholar

RODRIGUE M., MAGNAN M., & CHO C. H., 2013, Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical examination, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), p. 107-129.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1331-5   Google Scholar

SODHI M.S., 2015, Conceptualizing social responsibility in operations via stakeholder resource‐based view, in: Production and Operations Management, 24(9), p. 1375-1389.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12393   Google Scholar

SPAR D., LAMURE L., 2003, The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business, in: California Management Review, 45(3), p. 78-101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166177   Google Scholar

SPENCE C., 2009, Social accounting’s emancipatory potential, in: Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), p. 205-227.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.06.003   Google Scholar

SUCHMAN M. C., 1995, Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches, in: Academy of Management Review, 20(3), p. 571-610.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331   Google Scholar

TANG C. S., ZHOU S., 2012, Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations, in: European Journal of Operational Research, 223(3), p. 585-594.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.030   Google Scholar

TREGIDGA H., MILNE M., KEARINS K., 2014, (Re)presenting ‘sustainable organizations’, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), p. 477-494.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.10.006   Google Scholar

TYTECA D.,1998, Sustainability indicators at the firm level, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), p. 61-77.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.4.61   Google Scholar

WATTS R.L., ZIMMERMANN J.L., 1990, Positive accounting theory: a ten year perspective, in: Account Review, 65(1), p. 131-156.
  Google Scholar

WINFIELD M., GIBSON R. B., MARKVART T., GAUDREAU K., TAYLOR J., 2010, Implications of sustainability assessment for electricity system design: The case of the Ontario Power Authority‘s integrated power system plan, in: Energy Policy, 38(8), p. 4115-4126.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.038   Google Scholar

ZIENTARA P., 2015 Socioemotional wealth and corporate social responsibility: A critical analysis, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), p. 185-199.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2848-1   Google Scholar

ZHOU H., YANG Y., CHEN Y., ZHU J., 2017, Data Envelopment Analysis Application in Sustainability: The Origins, Development and Future Directions, in: European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), p. 1-16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.023   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2020-01-02

Cited by

Mishra, P. S., Kumar, A., & Das, N. (2020). Corporate Sustainability Practices in Polluting Industries: Evidence from India, China and USA. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 15(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.1.17

Authors

Prem Sagar Mishra 

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India

Authors

Ajay Kumar 

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India

Authors

Niladri Das 

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India

Statistics

Abstract views: 51
PDF downloads: 22