ANALYSIS OF THE USABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF WEBSITES IN VIEW OF THEIR UNIVERSAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 18 No. 3 (2022)
-
TOWARDS DIGITAL TWIN-DRIVEN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY OF FMS
Grzegorz BOCEWICZ, Robert WÓJCIK, Paweł SITEK, Zbigniew BANASZAK5-18
-
R PEAK DETERMINATION USING A WDFR ALGORITHM AND ADAPTIVE THRESHOLD
Thanh-Nghia NGUYEN, Thanh-Hai NGUYEN, Ba-Viet NGO19-30
-
SIMULATION STUDY OF HYDRODYNAMIC CAVITATION IN THE ORIFICE FLOW
Konrad PIETRYKOWSKI, Paweł KARPIŃSKI31-41
-
PARALLEL SOLUTION OF THERMOMECHANICAL INVERSE PROBLEMS FOR LASER DIELESS DRAWING OF ULTRA-THIN WIRE
Andrij MILENIN42-53
-
APPLICATION OF SIMULATION RESEARCH TO ANALYSE THE PRODUCTION PROCESS IN TERMS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Agnieszka ZACHCIAŁ, Andrzej JARDZIOCH54-62
-
ANALYSIS OF THE USABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF WEBSITES IN VIEW OF THEIR UNIVERSAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Błażej BADZIO, Agnieszka BODZIAK, Bartłomiej BRODAWKA, Karol BUCHAJCZUK, Maria SKUBLEWSKA-PASZKOWSKA, Mariusz DZIEŃKOWSKI, Paweł POWROŹNIK63-85
-
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) AIDED DESIGN OF A MULTI-ROTOR FLYING ROBOT FOR LOCATING SOURCES OF PARTICULATE MATTER POLLUTION
Grzegorz SUCHANEK, Roman FILIPEK86-104
-
A SIX-PORT MEASUREMENT DEVICE FOR HIGH POWER MICROWAVE VECTOR NETWORK ANALYSIS
Benjamin KOMMEY, Ernest Ofosu ADDO, Elvis TAMAKLOE, Eric Tutu TCHAO, Henry NUNOO-MENSAH105-129
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 4
2025-01-31 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 3
2024-09-30 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2024-08-14 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2024-03-30 12
-
Vol. 19 No. 4
2023-12-31 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 3
2023-09-30 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2023-06-30 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2023-03-31 10
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2022-12-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2022-09-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2022-06-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2022-03-30 7
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2021-12-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2021-09-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2021-06-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2021-03-30 8
-
Vol. 16 No. 4
2020-12-30 8
-
Vol. 16 No. 3
2020-09-30 8
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2020-06-30 8
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2020-03-30 8
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
agnieszka.bodziak@pollub.edu.pl
karol.buchajczuk@pollub.edu.pl
Abstract
Universal design is a strategic approach for planning and designing both the products and their environment, aimed at making a given product available to the widest number of possible users. It ensures equality for all of them and the opportunity to participate in the society. This concept is also crucial in the process of designing and developing software. The research was conducted with the use of four services, three of them were implemented for the purpose of this study. Two of them took into consideration the principles of universal design, while the others did not. The aim of the study was verification of the level of usability and accessibility of services by means of three independent methods: the LUT (Lublin University of Technology) checklist, an assessment taking into account WCAG 2.0 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) standards using the automatic WAVE evaluation tool (Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool) and a device allowing to track the movement of the eye while performing various tasks on websites. The websites were assessed by twenty experts in the field of creating web application interfaces, using the LUT checklist. The time to the first fixation (TTFF) that it took respondents to look at specific website elements was measured using the eye tracker device and iMotions software. All websites were checked by means of the WAVE tool to detect irregularities and non-compliance with universal design standards. The analysis performed clearly indicated that websites that follow the universal design guidelines were more useful, intuitive and accessible for users. It might be concluded that interfaces allow to find necessary information and perform desired actions in a shorter time when prepared in accordance with the principles of universal design.
Keywords:
References
Abascal, J., Arrue, M., & Valencia, X. (2019). Tools for Web Accessibility Evaluation. In Y. Yesilada & S. Harper (Eds.), Web Accessibility. Human–Computer Interaction Series (pp. 479–503). Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_26
Acosta-Vargas, P., Acosta, T., & Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Challenges to Assess Accessibility in Higher Education Websites: A Comparative Study of Latin America Universities. IEEE Access, 6, 36500–36508. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848978
Alonso-Virgós, L., Espada, J. P., Thomaschewski, J., & Crespo, R. G. (2020). Test usability guidelines and follow conventions. Useful recommendations from web developers. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 70, 103423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2020.103423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2020.103423
Centre for Excellence in Universal Design. (n.d.). What is Universal Design. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://universaldesign.ie/what-is-universal-design/
Digital Around the World. (n.d.). DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. Retrieved May 19, 2022, from https://datareportal.com/global-digital-overview
Fogli, D., Provenza, L., & Bernareggi, C. (2014). A Universal Design Resource for Rich Internet Applications based on Design Patterns. Universal Access in the Information Society, 13, 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0291-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0291-6
GP3 HD Eye-Tracking Device – Take Advantage Of Research-Grade Equipment. (n.d.). Gazepoint. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.gazept.com/product/gp3hd/
Grobelny, J., Jach, K., Kuliński, M., & Michalski, R. (2006). Śledzenie wzroku w badaniach jakości użytkowej oprogramowania. Historia i mierniki. https://repin.pjwstk.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/186319/166
Harper, S., & Chen, A. Q. (2012). Web accessibility guidelines. World Wide Web, 15(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-011-0130-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-011-0130-8
iMotions: Unpack Human Behavior. (n.d.). Imotions. Retrieved 20 May 2022, from https://imotions.com/
Initiative (WAI), W3C Web Accessibility. (n.d.). Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.w3.org/WAI/
Isa, W. A. R. W. M., Suhaimi, A. I. H., Ariffrn, N., Ishak, N. F., & Ralim, N. M. (2016). Accessibility evaluation using Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. In 2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2016.7857924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2016.7857924
Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K. S., & Paiva, S. (2020). Accessibility analysis of higher education institution websites of Portugal. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(3), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00653-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00653-2
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(4), 441–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3
Kumar, S., Shree DV, J., & Biswas, P. (2021). Comparing ten WCAG tools for accessibility evaluation of websites. Technology and Disability, 33(3), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-210329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-210329
Leszczyńska, E. (2019). Polacy w sieci: Analiza przemian użytkowania Internetu. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
Michalska, A. M., You, C. X., Nicolini, A. M., Ippolito, V. J., & Fink, W. (2014). Accessible Web Page Design for the Visually Impaired: A Case Study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30, 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.925771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.925771
Miłosz, M. (2014). Ergonomia systemów informatycznych. Politechnika Lubelska. Narzędzie do blogowania, platforma wydawnicza i system zarządzania treścią witryny (n.d.). WordPress.org Polska. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://pl.wordpress.org
Pascual, A., Ribera, M., Granollers, T., & Coiduras, J. L. (2014). Impact of Accessibility Barriers on the Mood of Blind, Low-vision and Sighted Users. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.047
Pivetta, E. M., Flor, C., Saito, D. S., & Ulbricht, V. R. (2013). Analysis of an Automatic Accessibility Evaluator to Validate a Virtual and Authenticated Environment. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040403
Sanderson, N., Chen, W., & Kessel, S. (2015). The Accessibility of Web-Based Media Services – An Evaluation. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Today's Technologies. UAHCI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (9175, pp. 242-252). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_24
Stasiak, W., & Dzieńkowski, M. (2021). Accessibility assessment of selected university websites. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 19, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2462
TVP Info. (n.d.). TVP Info. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.tvp.info
WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool. (n.d.). WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://wave.webaim.org
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. (n.d.). World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG
Yoon, K., Dols, R., Hulscher, L., & Newberry, T. (2016). An exploratory study of library website accessibility for visually impaired users. Library & Information Science Research, 38(3), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.08.006
Article Details
Abstract views: 1121
License
All articles published in Applied Computer Science are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
