The aim of this study was to design and empirically validate a predictive approach for classifying scrap types and forecasting scrap volume in brake calliper remanufacturing, oriented toward operational decision-making. We addressed three research questions: (1) which “red-flag” defects most strongly increase the risk of high scrap (“Large”); (2) whether scrap category is driven by the accumulation of multiple defects or by single catastrophic defects; and (3) whether logistic regression provides sufficient performance and interpretability for industrial use, or whether more complex machine-learning models are justified. The analysis used real industrial data (435 cases, 34 defect-related features with discrete values: 0/1 and, in some cases, counts). The baseline model (logistic regression) achieved 79% accuracy and an AUC of 0.773, confirming its practical usefulness in a production environment. Coefficient analysis indicated, among others, that the defect “power-supply leakage” is a strong predictor of the “Norm” class (OR ≈ 4.64 for “Norm” vs. “Large”), while defect-profile analysis revealed an accumulation trajectory (mean 7.3 defects for “Large” vs. 3.5 for “Norm”), distinct from a catastrophic trajectory (immediate disqualification). The study shows that interpretable models can support decision processes in remanufacturing, reducing scrap and supporting circular-economy and Industry 4.0 goals.
References
Aksoy, H. K., & Gupta, S. M. (2005). Buffer allocation plan for a remanufacturing cell. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48(3), 657–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2003.03.007
Fofou, R. F., Jiang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2021). A review on the lifecycle strategies enhancing remanufacturing. Applied Sciences, 11(13), Article 5937. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135937
Garcia, A. R., Filipe, S. B., Fernandes, C., Estevão, C., & Ramos, G. (2011). Enabling manufacturing competitiveness and economic sustainability. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV2011) (pp. 2–5).
Goodall, P., Sharpe, R., & West, A. (2019). A data-driven simulation to support remanufacturing operations. Computers in Industry, 105, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.11.001
Guide, V. D. R., Jr. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: Industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00034-6
Guide, V. D. R., Kraus, M. E., & Srivastava, R. (1997). Scheduling policies for remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 48(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(96)00091-6
Ijomah, W. L. (2009). Addressing decision making for remanufacturing operations and design-for-remanufacture. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030902953080
IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. (1998). Advances in production management systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35304-3
Jiang, Z., Fan, Z., Sutherland, J. W., Zhang, H., & Zhang, X. (2014). Development of an optimal method for remanufacturing process plan selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 72(9–12), 1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5783-x
Litwin, P., Gola, A., Wójcik, Ł., & Cioch, M. (2024). Optimization of the flow of parts in the process of brake caliper regeneration using the System Dynamics method. Processes, 12(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12010016
Lv, Y., Li, C., Zhao, X., Li, L., & Li, J. (2021). A novel approach for remanufacturing process planning considering uncertain and fuzzy information. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 16(3), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-021-0639-1
Parker, D., Riley, K., Robinson, S., Symington, H., Tewson, J., Jansson, K., Ramkumar, S., & Peck, D. (2015). Remanufacturing market study for Horizon 2020 (Grant Agreement No. 645984). European Remanufacturing Network.
Paschko, F., Knorn, S., Krini, A., & Kemke, M. (2023). Material flow control in remanufacturing systems with random failures and variable processing times. Journal of Remanufacturing, 13(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-023-00126-z
Pizoń, J., Wójcik, Ł., Gola, A., Kański, Ł., & Nielsen, I. (2024). Autonomous mobile robots in automotive remanufacturing: A case study for intra-logistics support. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 18(1), 177398. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/177398
Ponte, B., Cannella, S., Dominguez, R., Naim, M. M., & Syntetos, A. A. (2021). Quality grading of returns and the dynamics of remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 236, Article 108129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108129
Ponte, B., Naim, M. M., & Syntetos, A. A. (2019). The value of regulating returns for enhancing the dynamic behaviour of hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 278(2), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.04.019
Teixeira, E. L. S., Tjahjono, B., Beltran, M., & Julião, J. (2022). Demystifying the digital transition of remanufacturing: A systematic review of literature. Computers in Industry, 134, Article 103567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103567
Wójcik, Ł., & Gola, A. (2025). Utilization of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in regeneration processes control and optimization: A literature review. Applied Computer Science, 21(1), 1–15.
Yang, S., Raghavendra, M. R. A., Kaminski, J., & Pepin, H. (2018). Opportunities for Industry 4.0 to support remanufacturing. Applied Sciences, 8(7), Article 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071177
Zhao, J., Peng, S., Li, T., Lv, S., Li, M., & Zhang, H. (2019). Energy-aware fuzzy job-shop scheduling for engine remanufacturing at the multi-machine level. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 14(4), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0560-z