A data-driven framework for AI adoption efficiency assessment using hybrid DEA and machine learning methods
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 22 No. 3 (2026)
-
Enforcing label consistency and lowering labelling time in infants’ pose data via semi-automatic annotation
Greta DI MARINO, Emanuele CARDINALE, Alessio CORREANI, Lucia MIGLIORELLI, Sara MOCCIA1-14
-
A data-driven framework for AI adoption efficiency assessment using hybrid DEA and machine learning methods
Ewa CHODAKOWSKA15-29
-
ARECA-Lite: A lightweight modified ArecaNet with reduced complexity for real-time robust facial emotion recognition
Mustapha Abdelkader LAOUMIR, Amina KINANE DAOUADJI, Fatima BENDELLA30-51
-
Designing vehicle structures using materials with a low carbon footprint
Bartosz ŁATA, Jacek CZARNIGOWSKI, Wiktor ISKRA, Miłosz CHWIEJCZAK, Iga KOPEĆ52-61
-
Parallelogram-mode: A novel clustering method for categorical data
Ashuza KUDERHA, Olamma IHEANETU62-81
-
Digitalisation of relay protection and implementation of main protections in digital form
Dmytro DANYLCHENKO, Vladyslav TSIUPA, Oleksandr MIROSHNYK, Taras SHCHUR, Katarzyna PIOTROWSKA82-96
-
Modified snake optimizer algorithm for solving the permutation flow shop scheduling problem
Hassan ALMAZINI, Salah MORTADA, Hussein Fouad ALMAZINI97-107
-
Computer-based data processing approaches to production scrap management
Łukasz WÓJCIK, Arkadiusz GOLA, Jakub PIZOŃ108-120
-
A hybrid parameter-tuning for adaptive variable-length particle swarm optimisation in cancer feature selection
Shir Li WANG, Siti RAMADHANI, Muhammad FIKRY, Haldi BUDIMAN, Theam Foo NG, Sumayyah DZULKIFLY, Roziana ARIFFIN121-147
-
Beyond classical optimisation: Toward feasibility-aware computational architectures for synchronised systems
Grzegorz BOCEWICZ, Czesław SMUTNICKI, Zbigniew BANASZAK148-167
-
A composite latency model for evaluating hybrid OLTP/OLAP information systems
Volodymyr SOLOHUB, Volodymyr PASHKEVYCH168-180
-
Automatic methods for 3D motion trajectories gap filling: Custom-based Kalman vs. BiLSTM
Kamil ŻELAZOWSKI, Wojciech WOJCIECHEWICZ, Maria SKUBLEWSKA-PASZKOWSKA, Paweł POWROŹNIK181-195
-
Implementation of an IEC 61215-oriented photovoltaic module test emulator with integrated predictive maintenance capabilities
Aristide TOLOK NELEM, Yannick Antoine ABANDA, Steyve Samson NYATTE, Mathieu Jean Pierre PESDJOCK, Achille MELINGUI, Pierre ELE196-218
-
Modelling the predictive reliability of rotating machines using Artificial Intelligence.
Fernand Joseph TOUKAP NONO, Tokoue Ngatcha DIANORRÉ, Offole FLORENC, Mouzong Pemi MARCELIN219-243
-
Anomaly detection in vibroarthrographic signals using handcrafted signal features and one-class methods
Robert KARPIŃSKI, Arkadiusz SYTA244–261
Archives
-
Vol. 22 No. 3
2026-09-30 15
-
Vol. 22 No. 2
2026-06-30 15
-
Vol. 22 No. 1
2026-03-31 15
-
Vol. 21 No. 4
2025-12-31 12
-
Vol. 21 No. 3
2025-09-30 12
-
Vol. 21 No. 2
2025-06-30 12
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2025-03-31 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 4
2024-12-31 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 3
2024-09-30 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2024-06-30 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2024-03-30 12
-
Vol. 19 No. 4
2023-12-31 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 3
2023-09-30 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2023-06-30 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2023-03-31 10
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2022-12-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2022-09-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2022-06-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2022-03-31 8
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
Despite growing academic interest in artificial intelligence (AI) as a driver of economic transformation, the efficiency with which EU member states translate R&D investment and ICT human capital into measurable AI adoption outcomes remains insufficiently explored. This study proposes a data-driven computational framework that integrates data envelopment analysis (DEA) with machine learning (ML) to assess and explain the efficiency of AI adoption across EU countries during 2021–2024. In the first stage, an output-oriented VRS DEA model is combined with smoothed bootstrap bias correction. In the second stage, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest models, with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)- based decomposition, are employed to identify key predictors of efficiency, while bootstrapped truncated regression provides complementary statistical inference for robustness validation. Average bias-corrected efficiency increased over time, reflecting the diffusion of AI technologies across the EU. However, the results reveal substantial heterogeneity in the efficiency of AI adoption across EU member states. SHAP analysis identifies GDP per capita, regulatory quality, and the share of the ICT sector as the most important predictors of AI adoption efficiency. Country-grouped cross-validation indicates limited out-of-country predictive generalisability, while sensitivity analyses confirm broad stability of the leading-predictor structure. The truncated regression yields no statistically significant covariate effects, highlighting the inferential uncertainty associated with the small country-year sample. The study demonstrates the usefulness of combining bootstrap-corrected DEA, XGBoost, random forests, and SHAP for interpretable efficiency analysis in rapidly evolving technological environments.
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)
- Industry, Innovation, Technology and Infrastructure
References
Aristovnik, A. (2012). The relative efficiency of education and R&D expenditures in the new EU member states. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(5), 832–848. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.620167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.620167
Bánhidi, Z., & Dobos, I. (2024). Measuring digital development: Ranking using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and network readiness index (NRI). Central European Journal of Operations Research, 32, 1089–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-024-00919-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-024-00919-y
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Bresciani, S., Puertas, R., Ferraris, A., & Santoro, G. (2021). Innovation, environmental sustainability and economic development: DEA-Bootstrap and multilevel analysis to compare two regions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, Article 121040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121040
Brzozowska, J., Pizoń, J., Baytikenova, G., Gola, A., Zakimova, A., & Piotrowska, K. (2023). Data engineering in CRISP-DM process: Production data – case study. Applied Computer Science, 19(3), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2023-26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2023-26
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., & Goletsis, Y. (2016). A multilevel and multistage efficiency evaluation of innovation systems: A multiobjective DEA approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 62, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.017
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
Chodakowska, E. (2026). Data envelopment analysis and technologies of the industry of the future: A scoping review. Management and Production Engineering Review, 17(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24425/mper.2026.1318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/mper.2026.1318
Chodakowska, E., Danilczuk, W., & Nazarko, J. (2026). Artificial intelligence assistance in foresight research: Enhancing technology assessment through data-driven methods. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 20(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/211285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/211285
Chodakowska, E., Nazarko, J., & Chodakowska, N. (2026). Integrating AI skills with engineering management needs: Evidence from polish management and production engineering curricula and expert SWOT-AHP analysis. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2026.3714927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2026.3714927
Chodakowska, E., Nazarko, J., Nazarko, Ł., & Rabayah, H. S. (2024). Solar radiation forecasting: A systematic meta-review of current methods and emerging trends. Energies, 17(13), Article 3156. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133156
Cioch, M., Kulisz, M., & Gola, A. (2025). Comparison of machine learning methods in predictive maintenance of machines. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 19(11), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/208284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/208284
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers.
Furlan, M., Lima, P. A. B., Paião Junior, G. D., Mariano, E. B., & Pires, S. M. M. (2025). Proposing a composite index and maturity model for urban sustainability in the Brazilian context: A machine learning and data envelopment analysis approach. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3120
Guan, J., & Chen, K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy, 41(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.001
Hamid, S., & Wang, K. (2024). Are emerging BRICST economies greening? An empirical analysis from green innovation efficiency perspective. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26(2), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02622-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02622-z
Kehinde, T. O., Akpan, J., Orisaremi, K. K., Olanrewaju, O. A., Anyebe, D. I., & Kareem, M. K. (2026). Three decades of DEA-machine learning integration (1996–2025): A bibliometric analysis, science mapping, and state-of-the-art review. Machine Learning with Applications, 24, Article 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2026.100868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2026.100868
Khan, R. Z., Razak, L. A., & Premaratne, G. (2025). Green growth and sustainability: A systematic literature review on theories, measures and future directions. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 17, Article 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100274
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In I. Guyon, U. von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, & R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (pp. 4765–4774). Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Paper.pdf
Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (2010). National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Rev. ed.). Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903
Lunny, C., Brennan, S. E., McDonald, S., & McKenzie, J. E. (2017). Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: Paper 1–purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), Article 231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0617-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0617-1
Luo, H., Kamarudin, F., Soh, W., & Shan, Z. (2026). Fulfilment efficiency, AI capability, and cross-border e-commerce development in China: Complementarities, regional heterogeneity, and resource-saving potential. Sustainability, 18(3), Article 1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031202
Narayanan, E., Binti Ismail, W. R., & Bin Mustafa, Z. (2022). A data-envelopment analysis-based systematic review of the literature on innovation performance. Heliyon, 8(12), Article e11925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11925
Ndicu, S., Ngui, D., & Barasa, L. (2024). Technological catch-up, innovation, and productivity analysis of national innovation systems in developing countries in Africa 2010–2018. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 7941–7967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01327-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01327-4
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
Orynycz, O., Matijošius, J., Raymundo, H., Dos Reis, J. G. M., Ruchała, P., & Świć, A. (2026). Energy and emission disutilities of transport modes under transport innovation in the European Union. Energies, 19(5), Article 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051346
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
Shi, J., Mei, J., Zhu, L., & Wang, Y. (2024). Estimating the innovation efficiency of the artificial intelligence industry in China based on the three-stage DEA model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 9217–9228. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3323292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3323292
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009
Sun, L., Wang, L., Jiang, Q., & Zhao, Z. (2026). AI-driven efficiency: Artificial intelligence patents and operational performance in China’s fisheries industry. Aquaculture, 621, Article 743995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2026.743995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2026.743995
Tang, K., Qiu, Y., & Zhou, D. (2020). Does command-and-control regulation promote green innovation performance? Evidence from China’s industrial enterprises. Science of The Total Environment, 712, Article 136362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136362
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Wang, S., Huang, X., Xia, M., & Shi, X. (2024). Does artificial intelligence promote firms’ innovation efficiency: Evidence from the robot application. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(4), 16373–16394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01707-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01707-w
Zeng, J., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Ren, J. (2021). Innovation efficiency: A bibliometric review and future research agenda. Asia Pacific Business Review, 27(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2021.1858591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2021.1858591
Zhou, M., Cao, Y., & Huang, L. (2026). Digital economy, industrial structure optimization, and agricultural green development efficiency: A double machine learning causal analysis. Australian Economic Papers, 65(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.70009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.70009
Article Details
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Applied Computer Science are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
