AN INTEGRATED RISK INFORMED DECISION MAKING IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY

Mieczysław Józef  Borysiewicz; Karol Kowal; Piotr Prysiński; Marcin  Dąbrowski

doi:10.35784/iapgos.1448

Open full text

pdf

Published: May 16, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/iapgos.1448

Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2013)

Articles

OVERVIEW OF METHODS FOR SYNCHRONIZING WITH THE POWER GIRD (PLL) FOR POWER CONVERTERS
Piotr Lipnicki

5-8
DATA REDUCTION VERSUS FEATURE SELECTION IN APPLICATION OF DAILY MAXIMUM POWER LOAD FORECASTING
Krzysztof Siwek

9-12
MAGNETIC THERAPY: REMOTE CONTROLLING MICROPROCESSOR SYSTEM FOR MAGNETOTHERAPY
Katarzyna Biernat, Alicja Idziaszek-Gonzalez, Konrad Nita, Stefan Wójtowicz

13-17
DESIGN OF 7-BIT LOW-POWER, LOW AREA A/D CONVERTER IN SUBMICRON PROCESS FOR MULTICHANNEL SYSTEMS
Piotr Otfinowski, Piotr Kmon, Rafał Kłeczek

18-21
AN INTEGRATED RISK INFORMED DECISION MAKING IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY
Mieczysław Józef Borysiewicz, Karol Kowal, Piotr Prysiński, Marcin Dąbrowski

22-34
ELEMENTS OF AUTOMATIC CONTROL OF HYDRODYNAMIC SYSTEMS
Voronin Anatoli Mikhailovich, Bekmurza Ajtchanov, Janusz Partyka, Aldibekova Aitkul

35-36
AUGMENTED REALITY – THE WAY TO USING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY IN NORMAL LIFE
Maciej Laskowski, Damian Rawski, Przemysław Szadura

37-40
INDUCTANCE CALCULATION CONSIDERING MAGNETIC SATURATION OF INTERIOR PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES
Rafał Piotuch

41-44
EXTENDED KALMAN FILTER AS A FULL STATE OBSERVER IN APPLICATION OF THE INERTIA WHEEL PENDULUM
Jarosław Gośliński, Adam Owczarkowski

45-48

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35784/iapgos.1448

Authors

Mieczysław Józef Borysiewicz

manhaz@cyf.gov.pl

National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland, Poland

Karol Kowal

karol.kowal@ncbj.gov.pl

National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland, Poland

Piotr Prysiński

piotr.prusinski@ncbj.gov.pl

National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland, Poland

Marcin Dąbrowski

marcin.dabrowski@paa.gov.pl

National Atomic Energy Agency (NAEA), Department of Nuclear Safety, Division of Inspection of Nuclear Installations, Poland, Poland

Abstract

The regulatory body, established to ensure safety of nuclear facilities, is expected to make right decisions and provide appropriate regulations for the nuclear industry. The traditional manner of its activity has been based on a deterministic approach to safety analyses. However, increased maturity of Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) makes it complementary to deterministic studies. The new IAEA concept, described in this article, is to apply an integrated approach by combining both deterministic and probabilistic insights with other requirements affecting the decision making process.

Keywords:

Nuclear Safety, Integrated Risk Informed Decision Making (IRIDM), Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA), Deterministic Safety Assessment (DSA)

References

Ahn B.S., Park K.S.: Comparing methods for multi-attribute decision making with ordinal weights. Computers and Operations Research 35/2008, pp. 1660-1670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.09.026

Borysiewicz M., Furtek A., Potempski S.: Poradnik metod ocen ryzyka związanego z niebezpiecznymi instalacjami procesowymi. Instytut Energii Atomowej, Otwock-Świerk 2000.

Borysiewicz M., Kowal K., Potempski S.: Decision making for safety of technological installations based on risk. Proceedings of the XIX ScientificTechnical Seminar of Materials Investigation for Power Industry, Zakopane 2012, pp. 209-219.

Cooke R.M.: Experts in Uncertainty. Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991.

Govaerts P.: Roles, functions and value of TSOs. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 49-54.

Hahn L.: Independent technical and scientific advice for regulatory decision making. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 55-65.

Jia J., Fisher G.W., Dyer J.S.: Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 11/1998, pp. 85-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199806)11:2<85::AID-BDM282>3.0.CO;2-K

Knudsen J.K., Smith C.L.: Estimation of system failure probability uncertainty including model success criteria. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PSA and Management, San Juan 2002, pp. 201-206.

Ko K.S., Han K.I.: Relevance of TSOs in providing technical and scientific services to operators/industry. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 67-85.

Lee J.C., McCormick N.J.: Risk and Safety Analysis of Nuclear Systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118043462

Lyubarskiy A., Kuzmina I., El-Shanawany M.: Advances in Risk Informed Decision Making – IAEA’s Approach. Proceedings of the Nordic PSA Conference, Gottröra 2011, pp. 1-14.

Małecki L.: Introduction to the nuclear energy in Poland. Proceedings of the XIX Scientific-Technical Seminar of Materials Investigation for Power Industry, Zakopane 2012, pp. 1-40.

Rao K.D., Kushwaha H.S., Verma A.K., Srividya A.: Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 92/2009, pp. 947-956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.07.002

Strupczewski A.: Safety classification of nuclear power plants structures, systems and components and their qualification. Proceedings of the XIX Scientific-Technical Seminar of Materials Investigation for Power Industry, Zakopane 2012, pp. 57-84.

Valtonen K., Vanttola T.: Role of the TSO in public information/debate openness, transparency. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 97-102.

Volkanovski A., Čepin M.: Implication of PSA uncertainties on risk-informed decision making. Nuclear Engineering and Design 241/2011, pp. 1108-1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.02.041

Xuan S.: A Novel Kind of Decision of Weight of Multi-attribute DecisionMaking Model Based on Bayesian Networks. International Seminar on Business and Information Management 2/2008, pp. 30-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBIM.2008.94

Health and Safety Executive: The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. HSE Books, Sudbury 1992.

Health and Safety Executive: Reducing Risks, Protecting People: HSE’s decision-making process. HSE Books, Norwich 2001.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Equipment qualification in operational nuclear power plants: upgrading, preserving and reviewing. IAEA, Vienna 1998.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Basic safety principles for nuclear power plants. IAEA, Vienna 1999.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Quality assurance within regulatory bodies. IAEA, Vienna 1999.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Operational safety performance indicators for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2000.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Training the staff of the regulatory body for nuclear facilities: A competency framework. IAEA, Vienna 2001.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Safety Margins of Operating Reactors. IAEA, Vienna 2003.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Precursor analyses – The use of deterministic and PSA based methods in the event investigation process at nuclear power plants. IAEA, Vienna 2004.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Assessment of Defence in Depth for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2005.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Defence in Depth in Nuclear Safety. IAEA, Vienna 2005.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Risk informed regulation of nuclear facilities: Overview of the current status. IAEA, Vienna 2005.

International Atomic Energy Agency: IAEA Safety Glossary – Terminology Used In Nuclear Safety And Radiation Protection. IAEA, Vienna 2007.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Deterministic Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2009.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Safety assessment for facilities and activities. IAEA, Vienna 2009.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Development and Application of Level-1 PSA. IAEA, Vienna 2010.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Development and Application of Level-2 PSA. IAEA, Vienna 2010.

International Atomic Energy Agency: The Interface Between Safety and Security at Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2010.

International Atomic Energy Agency: A Framework for an Integrated Risk Informed Decision Making Process. IAEA, Vienna 2011.

International Atomic Energy Agency: Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design. IAEA, Vienna 2012.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Reactor Safety Study - An assessment of accident risks in U. S. commercial nuclear power plants. U.S. NRC, Washington D. C. 1975.

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Safety goals for nuclear power plants operations. USNRC, Washington 1996.

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Guidance on the Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decision Making. US NRC, Washington 2009.

Borysiewicz, M. J. ., Kowal, K., Prysiński, P., & Dąbrowski, M. . (2013). AN INTEGRATED RISK INFORMED DECISION MAKING IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary W Gospodarce I Ochronie Środowiska, 3(2), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.35784/iapgos.1448

AN INTEGRATED RISK INFORMED DECISION MAKING IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY

Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2013)

Archives

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

License

Article Sidebar

Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2013)

Archives

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

License