WYDAJNOŚĆ IMPLEMENTACJI PODSTAWOWYCH METOD CAŁKOWANIA W ŚRODOWISKU APP INVENTOR

Kamil Żyła

doi:10.5604/20830157.1148047

Open full text

pdf (Język Polski)

Published: Mar 31, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/20830157.1148047

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5604/20830157.1148047

Authors

Kamil Żyła

k.zyla@pollub.pl

Politechnika Lubelska, Instytut Informatyki

Abstract

This paper presents comparison of efficiency of basic integration methods implemented in App Inventor and Java for Android environment. Chosen methods (rectangle, trapezoidal and Simpson’s rules) were applied for linear, cubic and sine functions. Conducted experiment revealed that applications developed in App Inventor were significantly slower than in case of Java, which makes App Inventor unsuitable for applications involving intensive calculations.

Keywords:

mobile computing, model-driven engineering, MDE, Android, App Inventor, numerical integration

References

Chadha K.: Improving the usability of App Inventor through conversion between blocks and text. Undergraduate thesis. Wellesley College, 2014.

Conder S., Darcey L.: Android wireless application development. Addison-Wesley, 2011.

Dahlquist G., Bjorck A.: Metody numeryczne. PWN, Warszawa 1983.

Grover S., Pea R.: Using a discourse-intensive pedagogy and android's App Inventor for introducing computational concepts to middle school students. Proceedings of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, New York 2013.

Jordan L., Greyling P.: Practical Android Projects. Apress, 2011.

Karakus M., Uludag S., Guler E., Turner S.W., Ugur A.: Teaching computing and programming fundamentals via App Inventor for Android. 2012 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET). IEEE, 2012.

Kepley S.: Rapid development of mobile apps using App Inventor and AGCO API. Master of Science thesis. Kansas State University, 2014.

Morelli R., de Lanerolle T., Lake P., Limardo N., Tamotsu E., Uche C.: Can Android App Inventor bring computational thinking to K-12?. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, New York 2011.

Roy K., Rousse W.C., DeMeritt D.B.: Comparing the mobile novice programming environments: App Inventor for Android vs. GameSalad. Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2012. IEEE, 2012.

Sung W.-T., Lin J.-S.: Design and implementation of a smart LED lighting system using a self adaptive weighted data fusion algorithm. Sensors 13/2013, s. 16915-16939.

Wolber D., Abelson H., Spertus E., Looney L.: App Inventor: Create your own Android apps. O'Reilly Media, 2011.

developer.android.com, dostęp 04.09.2014r.

appinventorblog.com, dostęp 04.09.2014r.

appinventorblog.com/2011/08/09/app-inventor-discontinued-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/, dostęp 04.09.2014r.

appinventor.mit.edu, dostęp 07.09.2014r.

readwrite.com/2011/08/16/mit_launches_center_for_mobile_learning_with_suppo, dostęp 04.09.2014r.

Żyła, K. (2015). IMPLEMENTATION OF BASIC INTEGRATION METHODS IN APP INVENTOR ENVIRONMENT AND THEIR EFFICIENCY. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary W Gospodarce I Ochronie Środowiska, 5(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.5604/20830157.1148047

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

License