Comparative analysis of frameworks dedicated to enterprise designing


Abstract

The aim of this paper is a comparative analysis of frameworks for designing corporate applications. For analytic reasons the application for document circulation within a law firm was designed. The presented comparative analysis includes TOGAF framework as well as Zachman framework. The analysis was conducted on group of experts based on evaluation criteria divided on several groups. Five groups of criteria were defined: implementation, testing, time-consuming, documentation and schedule planning. As the research shows, Zachman framework presents a versatile approach towards designing corporate architecture, because it presents not only the client’s vision but also the visions of a designer and a programmer, whereas TOGAF framework focuses mainly on business approach regarding aims and strategy of an enterprise. The aforementioned research was carried out on a group on a two domain experts.


Keywords

enterprise architecture; TOGAF; Zachman

[1] Abbas W. F., Ismail S. H., Haron H., Hariri W. N.: Enterprise Integration of Employee Onboarding Process Using Zachman Framework, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.31), 2018, s. 46-51.
[2] De Villiers D. J.: Using the Zachman Framework to assess the rational unified process. The Rational Edge, 2001.
[3] Ertaul L., Sudarsanam R.: Security Planning Using Zachman Framework for Enterprises, 2005.
[4] Ertaul L., Vandana S., Gulati K., Saldamli G.: Enterprise Security Planning using the Zachman Framework-Builder's Perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Management (SAM). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp), 2011.
[5] Goethals F.: An overview of enterprise architecture framework deliverables. 2005.
[6] Governica, hasło: TOGAF, https://www.governica.com/TOGAF, (09.03.2019).
[7] Josey A.: TOGAF Version 9.1-A Pocket Guide. Van Haren, 2016
[8] Kotusev S.: The TOGAF-Based Enterprise Architecture Practice: An Exploratory Case Study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2018, 43(1), 20.
[9] Sowa J. F., Zachman J. A.: Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture.IBM systems journal, 1992
[10] Tao Z. G., Luo Y. F., Chen C. X., Wang M. Z., Ni F.: Enterprise application architecture development based on DoDAF and TOGAF.Enterprise Information Systems, 2017,11(5), s. 627-651.
[11] TOGAF Version 9.1 Enterprise Architecture, Module I Management Overview, http://www.togaf.info/togafSlides91/TOGAF-V91-M1-Management-Overview.pdf, (03.01.2019)
[12] Visual Paradigm, hasło: „Zachman”, https://www.visual-paradigm.com/guide/enterprise-architecture/what-is-zachman-framework/, (20.03.2019).
[13] Visual Paradigm, hasło: The Best TOGAF Software, https://www.visual-paradigm.com/guide/togaf/best-togaf-software/, (09.03.2019).
[14] Yaqin M. A., Prayoga F. A., Ihsan A. N., Pulungan F.: Arsitektur Enterprise pada Permainan Hay Day Menggunakan Metode Zachman Framework. Prosiding SENIATI, 5(3), 2019, s. 50-58.
Download

Published : 2019-12-30


Curyła, K., & Habernal, K. (2019). Comparative analysis of frameworks dedicated to enterprise designing. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 13, 315-322. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.1326

Katarzyna Curyła  kasiacuryla@gmail.com
Lublin University of Technology  Poland
Karolina Habernal 
Lublin University of Technology  Poland