Comparative analysis of frameworks dedicated to enterprise designing
Katarzyna Curyła
kasiacuryla@gmail.comLublin University of Technology (Poland)
Karolina Habernal
Lublin University of Technology (Poland)
Abstract
The aim of this paper is a comparative analysis of frameworks for designing corporate applications. For analytic reasons the application for document circulation within a law firm was designed. The presented comparative analysis includes TOGAF framework as well as Zachman framework. The analysis was conducted on group of experts based on evaluation criteria divided on several groups. Five groups of criteria were defined: implementation, testing, time-consuming, documentation and schedule planning. As the research shows, Zachman framework presents a versatile approach towards designing corporate architecture, because it presents not only the client’s vision but also the visions of a designer and a programmer, whereas TOGAF framework focuses mainly on business approach regarding aims and strategy of an enterprise. The aforementioned research was carried out on a group on a two domain experts.
Keywords:
enterprise architecture; TOGAF; ZachmanReferences
[2] De Villiers D. J.: Using the Zachman Framework to assess the rational unified process. The Rational Edge, 2001.
[3] Ertaul L., Sudarsanam R.: Security Planning Using Zachman Framework for Enterprises, 2005.
[4] Ertaul L., Vandana S., Gulati K., Saldamli G.: Enterprise Security Planning using the Zachman Framework-Builder's Perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Management (SAM). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp), 2011.
[5] Goethals F.: An overview of enterprise architecture framework deliverables. 2005.
[6] Governica, hasło: TOGAF, https://www.governica.com/TOGAF, (09.03.2019).
[7] Josey A.: TOGAF Version 9.1-A Pocket Guide. Van Haren, 2016
[8] Kotusev S.: The TOGAF-Based Enterprise Architecture Practice: An Exploratory Case Study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2018, 43(1), 20.
[9] Sowa J. F., Zachman J. A.: Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture.IBM systems journal, 1992
[10] Tao Z. G., Luo Y. F., Chen C. X., Wang M. Z., Ni F.: Enterprise application architecture development based on DoDAF and TOGAF.Enterprise Information Systems, 2017,11(5), s. 627-651.
[11] TOGAF Version 9.1 Enterprise Architecture, Module I Management Overview, http://www.togaf.info/togafSlides91/TOGAF-V91-M1-Management-Overview.pdf, (03.01.2019)
[12] Visual Paradigm, hasło: „Zachman”, https://www.visual-paradigm.com/guide/enterprise-architecture/what-is-zachman-framework/, (20.03.2019).
[13] Visual Paradigm, hasło: The Best TOGAF Software, https://www.visual-paradigm.com/guide/togaf/best-togaf-software/, (09.03.2019).
[14] Yaqin M. A., Prayoga F. A., Ihsan A. N., Pulungan F.: Arsitektur Enterprise pada Permainan Hay Day Menggunakan Metode Zachman Framework. Prosiding SENIATI, 5(3), 2019, s. 50-58.
Authors
Karolina HabernalLublin University of Technology Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 461PDF downloads: 389
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
