Comparative analysis of view technologies for the Spring application
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Published:
Mar 30, 2020
Issue Vol. 14 (2020)
Articles
-
Perfomance analysis of relational databases MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB and H2
Katarzyna Krocz, Oleksandra Kizun, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska1-7
-
Applications supporting utilization of agile methods in software development process
Tomasz Bławucki, Siarhei Ramanovich, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska8-13
-
An assessment of portal to learn foreign languages
Marek Szmit, Paweł Wojtaszko, Grzegorz Kozieł14-18
-
Functional and performance analysis of selected message brokers in a distributed application
Tobiasz Kaciuczyk, Tomasz Korga, Jakub Smołka19-25
-
Comparative analysis of Windows Presentation Foundation and Windows Forms
Michał Pasztaleniec, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska26-30
-
Impact of the cloud application programming language on the performance of its implementation in selected serverless environments
Krzysztof Bezrąk, Sławomir Przyłucki31-36
-
Application of support vector machine in a traffic lights control
Artur Całuch, Adam Cieślikowski, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik37-42
-
Comparison of GreenDao and Room ORM Systems
Maciej Lewiński43-47
-
An Assessment of IT Students' Awareness in the Field of Instant Messengers Security
Paweł Stręciwilk, Grzegorz Kozieł48-54
-
Methods of determining indicators of similarity of 3D motion
Piotr Flisiak, Marcin Kuszyk55-58
-
Perfomance analysis of frameworks Angular and Vue.js
Roman Baida, Maksym Andriienko, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik59-64
-
Possibility analysis of applying serious game to learn the first aid procedures
Klaudia Zaborek, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik65-72
-
Comparison of the performance of tools for creating a SPA application interface - React and Vue.js
Krzysztof Boczkowski, Beata Pańczyk73-77
-
Comparative analysis of view technologies for the Spring application
Vadym Borys, Roman Slezenko, Beata Pańczyk78-81
-
Performance analysis of selected tools for building a Single Page Application
Yehor Timanovskyi, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik82-87
-
Analysis of selected usability assessment methods in the process of creating web applications
Krzysztof Nowak, Daniel Samolej88-93
-
Performance analysis of selected database systems: MySQL, MS SQL, PostgerSQL in the context of web applications
Katarzyna Lachewicz94-100
-
Methods of creating realistic spaces – 3D scanning and 3D modelling
Aleksandra Salwierz, Tomasz Szymczyk101-108
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Vadym Borys
Lublin University of Technology, Ukraine
Roman Slezenko
Lublin University of Technology, Ukraine
Beata Pańczyk
Lublin University of Technology, Poland
Abstract
The goal of the article is to choose the most efficient user interface creation tools possible for Spring. The study compares 4 selected view technologies: JSP, Thymeleaf, Wicket and Angular. Time and memory performance tests were carried out using Rest API in Spring. Test results allowed to identify the best solutions.
Keywords:
performance; Spring; Angular; JSP; Thymeleaf; Wicket
References
[1] Sanjay Patni: Pro RESTful APIs: Design, Build and Integrate with REST,JSON, XML and JAX-RS 1st ed. Edition. Apress 2017.
[2] Amuthan G : Spring MVC Beginner's Guide Paperback . Packt Publishing - ebooks Account 2014
[3] Craig Walls: Spring in Action - Fifth Edition. Manning Publications 2018.
[4] https://www.callicoder.com/spring-boot-actuator [13.10.2019]
[5] Hans Bergsten: JavaServer Pages - 3rd Edition. O'Reilly Media 2003.
[6] Michael Good: Thymeleaf with Spring Boot: An easy to follow guide. Amazon Digital Services LLC 2018
[7] Igor Vaynberg: Apache Wicket Cookbook. Packt Publishing 2011.
[8] Jeremy Wilken: Angular in Action 1st Edition. Manning Publications 1 edition 2018.
[9] https://siftery.com/product-comparison/angularjs-vs-thymeleaf, AngularJS vs Thymeleaf - Product Comparison [26.03.2019].
[10] https://siftery.com/product-comparison/angularjs-vs-apache-wicket, Angular vs Wicket – Product comparsion [27.03.2019].
[11] https://www.mysql.com/about, oficjalna strona MySQL [10.10.2019].
[12] https://hibernate.org/orm, oficjalna strona Hibernate ORM [10.10.2019].
[2] Amuthan G : Spring MVC Beginner's Guide Paperback . Packt Publishing - ebooks Account 2014
[3] Craig Walls: Spring in Action - Fifth Edition. Manning Publications 2018.
[4] https://www.callicoder.com/spring-boot-actuator [13.10.2019]
[5] Hans Bergsten: JavaServer Pages - 3rd Edition. O'Reilly Media 2003.
[6] Michael Good: Thymeleaf with Spring Boot: An easy to follow guide. Amazon Digital Services LLC 2018
[7] Igor Vaynberg: Apache Wicket Cookbook. Packt Publishing 2011.
[8] Jeremy Wilken: Angular in Action 1st Edition. Manning Publications 1 edition 2018.
[9] https://siftery.com/product-comparison/angularjs-vs-thymeleaf, AngularJS vs Thymeleaf - Product Comparison [26.03.2019].
[10] https://siftery.com/product-comparison/angularjs-vs-apache-wicket, Angular vs Wicket – Product comparsion [27.03.2019].
[11] https://www.mysql.com/about, oficjalna strona MySQL [10.10.2019].
[12] https://hibernate.org/orm, oficjalna strona Hibernate ORM [10.10.2019].
Article Details
Borys, V., Slezenko, R., & Pańczyk, B. (2020). Comparative analysis of view technologies for the Spring application. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 14, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.1580
Abstract views: 545
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
