Semi-supervised learning with the clustering and Decision Trees classifier for the task of cognitive workload study
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 15 (2020)
-
Neural networks in recognition of handwriting
Bernadetta Michalik, Marek Miłosz109-113
-
Influence the quality of the interface of online stores on their memorability
Katarzyna Pytka, Marek Miłosz114-120
-
Comparison of the NFC authentication method with the methods available in Android
Dmytro Malenko121-125
-
Comparative analysis of database systems dedicated for Android
Kamil Wałachowski, Grzegorz Kozieł126-132
-
Digital services in Poland and the Far East - comparative analysis
Dominik Klej133-138
-
Modern technologies for creating graphical user interface in web applications
Mateusz Kaproń, Beata Pańczyk139-142
-
Verification of the precision of GSM and GPS signals available on mobile devices
Mateusz Wlaź, Grzegorz Kozieł143-149
-
Corporate intranet platform – open and commercial solutions comparison
Konrad Czarny150-155
-
Comparative analysis of solutions used in automated testing
Agnieszka Dorota Wac, Tomasz Kamil Watras, Grzegorz Kozieł156-163
-
Analysis of the vulnerability of IT system users to a phishing attack
Szymon Grzebielec164-167
-
Contactless interfaces in virtual reality
Andriy Dragni, Tomasz Szymczyk168-171
-
The system using mobile technologies to test reaction time
Michał Woś, Artur Zdzioch172-177
-
Comparative analysis of a selected version of the Symfony framework
Michał Jusięga, Mariusz Dzieńkowski178-183
-
Containerization methods in internet service applications
Krzysztof Ferenc184-188
-
Performance analysis of languages working on Java Virtual Machine based on Java, Scala and Kotlin
Katarzyna Buszewicz189-195
-
The "Quizer" e-learning platform as a tool for creating interactive quizzes with multiplayer functionality
Krzysztof Dziedzic, Marek Gudków, Tomasz Wiśniewski196-201
-
Analysis of typical programming mistakes made by first and second year IT students
Monika Kaczorowska202-205
-
Object classification using X-ray images
Piotr Nowosad, Małgorzata Charytanowicz206-213
-
Semi-supervised learning with the clustering and Decision Trees classifier for the task of cognitive workload study
Martyna Wawrzyk214-218
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The paper is focused on application of the clustering algorithm and Decision Tress classifier (DTs) as a semi-supervised method for the task of cognitive workload level classification. The analyzed data were collected during examination of Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) with use of eye-tracker device. 26 participants took part in examination as volunteers. There were conducted three parts of DSST test with different levels of difficulty. As a results there were obtained three versions of data: low, middle and high level of cognitive workload. The case study covered clustering of collected data by using k-means algorithm to detect three clusters or more. The obtained clusters were evaluated by three internal indices to measure the quality of clustering. The David-Boudin index detected the best results in case of four clusters. Based on this information it is possible to formulate the hypothesis of the existence of four clusters. The obtained clusters were adopted as classes in supervised learning and have been subjected to classification. The DTs was applied in classification. There were obtained the 0.85 mean accuracy for three-class classification and 0.73 mean accuracy for four-class classification.
Keywords:
References
T. Urruty, S. Lew, N. Ihadaddene and D. A. Simovici, Detecting eye fixations by projection clustering. ACM Transaction on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Application, 3 (4), 5:1–5:20, 2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1314303.1314308
N. Flad, T. Fomina, H. H. Buelthoff and L. L. Chuang, Unsupervised Clustering of EOG as a Viable Substitute for Optical Eye Tracking. Eye Tracking and Visualization, Cham, 2017, 151–167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47024-5_9
R. S. Hessels, D. C. Niehorster, C. Kemner and I. T. C. Hooge Noise-robust fixation detection in eye movement data: Identification by two-means clustering (I2MC). Behaviour Research Methods, 49 (5), 1802–1823, 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0822-1
J. Otero-Millan, J. L. A. Castro, S. L. Macknik and S. Martinez-Conde Unsupervised clustering method to detect microsaccades. Journal of Vision, 14 (2), 18–18, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/14.2.18
A. Santella and D. DeCarlo Robust clustering of eye movement recordings for quantification of visual interest. Proceedings of the 2004 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications, San Antonio, Texas, 2004, 27–34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/968363.968368
P. K. Mital, T. J. Smith, R. L. Hill and J. M. Henderson, Clustering of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion. Cognitive Computation, 3 (1), 5–24, 2011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-010-9074-z
Z. Kang and S. J. Landry An Eye Movement Analysis Algorithm for a Multielement Target Tracking Task: Maximum Transition-Based Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45 (1), 13–24, 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2014.2363121
M. Aamir and S. M. A. Zaidi Clustering based semi-supervised machine learning for DDoS attack classification. Journal of King Saud University - Computer Information Sciences, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.02.003
K. Liang, Y. Chahir, M. Molina, C. Tijus and F. Jouen Appearance-based gaze tracking with spectral clustering and semi-supervised Gaussian process regression. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Eye Tracking South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa, 2013, 17–23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2509315.2509318
K. Wang, B. Wang and L. Peng CVAP: Validation for Cluster Analyses. Data Science Journal, 8 (0), 88–93, 2009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.007-020
A. Thalamuthu, I. Mukhopadhyay, X. Zheng and G. C. Tseng Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 22 (19), 2405–2412, 2006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl406
S. Dudoit and J. Fridlyand A prediction-based resampling method for estimating the number of clusters in a dataset. Genome Biology, 3 (7), 2002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0036
T. Caliński and J. Harabasz A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistic, 3 (1), 1–27, 1974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610917408548446
P. J. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65, 1987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
D. L. Davies and D. W. Bouldin A Cluster Separation Measure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-1 (2), 224–227, 1979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909
C. Boake From the Binet-Simon to the Wechsler-Bellevue: tracing the history of intelligence testing. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24 (3), 383–405, 2002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.3.383.981
V. Sicard, R. D. Moore, i D. Ellemberg Sensitivity of the Cogstate Test Battery for Detecting Prolonged Cognitive Alterations Stemming From Sport-Related Concussions. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine: Official Journal Canadian Academy Sport Medicine,29 (1), 62–6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000492
Article Details
Abstract views: 359
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
