Corporate intranet platform – open and commercial solutions comparison
Abstract
The article presents a comparison of CMS systems that can be used when creating an intranet platform for a corporate network. The primary goal is to indicate which of the technologies is the most suitable for a large international corporation. Two open (WordPress, Drupal) and commercial (SharePoint, Confluence) tools were included in the study.
Keywords:
SharePoint; Drupal; Confluence; WordPressReferences
W3techs, https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cm-sharepoint/all/all [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
W3techs, https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cm-confluence/all/all [0.1.09.2018]
Google Scholar
W3techs, https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cm-wordpress/ [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
W3techs, https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cm-drupal/ [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
J. Robertson, Designing Intranets: Creating Sites that Work. Step Two Designs, 2010
Google Scholar
A. Rockley, P. Kostur, S. Mannig, Managing Enterprise Content: A Unified Content Strategy. New Riders, 2003.
Google Scholar
Microsoft, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/ [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
Atlassian, https://confluence.atlassian.com/ [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
WordPress, https://codex.wordpress.org/ [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
Drupal, https://www.drupal.org/documentation/ [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
C-sharpcorner, https://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/40e97e/sharepoint-non-functionalrequirements/ [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
Bezpieczna chmura, https://zaufanatrzeciastrona.pl/post/jak-bezpiecznie-przeniesc-sie-do-chmury-wymagania-prawne/ [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
OpenSecurity, https://opensecurity.pl/bezpieczenstwo-informacji-wg-iso-27001/ [01.09.2018]
Google Scholar
Statistics
Abstract views: 516PDF downloads: 370
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
