An Examination of Selected Websites Availability For People With Various Types of Disabilities
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 17 (2020)
-
Impact of the persistence layer implementation methods on application per-formance
Kamil Siebyła, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska326-331
-
Analysis of positioning errors of the GPS navigation receivers
Łukasz Budzyński, Eligiusz Pawłowski332-338
-
Analysis and comparison of programming frameworks used for automated tests
Damian Gromek, Dariusz Gutek339-344
-
An Examination of Selected Websites Availability For People With Various Types of Disabilities
Mateusz Proskura, Sylwia Podkościelna, Grzegorz Kozieł345-350
-
Comparative analysis of web application performance testing tools
Agata Kołtun, Beata Pańczyk351-357
-
Performance comparison of relational databases SQL Server, MySQL and PostgreSQL using a web application and the Laravel framework
Rafał Wodyk, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska358-364
-
Comparative analysis of microcontrollers from the Arduino family and other compatible ones
Przemysław Suszek, Tomasz Szymczyk365-372
-
Oracle 19c, SQL Server 2019, Postgresql 12 and MySQL 8 database systems comparison
Arkadiusz Solarz, Tomasz Szymczyk373-378
-
Comparative analysis of medical images watermarking methods
Sylwia Duda, Dominik Fijałek, Grzegorz Kozieł379-383
-
Performance comparison of web services using Symfony, Spring, and Rails examples
Patryk Lubartowicz, Beata Pańczyk384-389
-
Modeling of COVID-19 cases of selected states in Nigeria using linear and non-linear prediction models
Babatunde Abdulrauph Olarenwaju, Igboeli Uchenna Harrison390-395
-
Comparative analysis of the technology used to create multi-platform applications on the example of NW.js and Electron
Maciej Hołowiński, Beata Pańczyk396-400
-
Faster R-CNN model learning on synthetic images
Błażej Łach, Edyta Łukasik401-404
-
Enviromental data visualisation using Delaunay triangulation
Mateusz Nowosad405-411
-
Comparison of methods and tools for generating levels of details of 3D models for popular game engines
Michał Tomecki412-416
-
Analysis of the use of the UTAUT model for modeling the information technology acceptance process
Magdalena Czerwinska417-420
-
Transport preferences of the students and employers in Lublin University of Technology
Jakub Bis, Magda Kojro421-427
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
mateusz.proskura@pollub.edu.pl
Abstract
The Internet is transforming into the main source of information. Standards are being developed so that people with different types of disabilities are not to feel excluded. Tools based on certain standards automate tasks, but they are also important to work correctly. The study consisted of checking the pages with selected tools discussed in the literature dealing with website accessibility. The validators are identically configured each time the website verifies compliance with the WCAG 2.1 standard. The number of errors detected per page varies significantly when using individual tools. The error rate calculated for the number of all HTML elements of the page ranges between less than 1% and 80%. It is not possible to unambiguously select the worst service on the basis of analyzing all results obtained, it can be a different service for each tool. The tools automate the activities of verifying availability. Each of the validators tested found errors, some of the same. The best solution is not to rely on just one tool, because the results obtained can relate to completely different elements of the page. It all depends on the care of the creators in the preparation of the tool and their care for compliance with standards.
Keywords:
References
A. Marcinkowski, P. Marcinkowski, WCAG 2.0 Podręcznik Dobrych Praktyk, Fundacja Widzialni, 2012
J. Dębski, D. Paszkiewicz, Dostępność Serwisów Internetowych, Fundacja Integracja, 2013
J. Zadrożny, Dostępne WWW, Fundacja Instytut Rozwoju Regionalnego, 2009
M. Szczygielska, Dostępne multimedia, Fundacja Widzialni, 2016
H. Dudycz, Ł. Krawiec, Porównywanie walidatorów do badania dostępności badania stron WWW, Studia Informatica Pomerania nr 3/2016 (41) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/si.2016.41-03
G. Kozłowski, M. Rotnicki, M. Trzeciakiewicz, P. Witek, J. Zadrożny, ,Narzędzia do badania dostępności i tworzenia dostępnych treści, Fundacja Instytut Rozwoju Regionalnego, 2014.
Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 12 kwietnia 2012 r. w sprawie Krajowych Ram Interoperacyjności, minimalnych wymagań dla rejestrów publicznych i wymiany informacji w postaci elektronicznej oraz minimalnych wymagań dla systemów teleinformatycznych, http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20120000526, [03.06.2020].
Dokumentacja WCAG 2.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21, [03.06.2020].
Html Validator, http://validator.w3.org, [03.06.2020].
Dokumentacja Utilitia, http://mozliwosci/opis-dzialania-wszystkich-testow-uslugi-utilitia, [03.06.2020].
Walidator Wave Toolbar, http://wave.webaim.org, [03.06.2020].
Walidator aChecker, http://achecker.ca, [03.06.2020].
Walidator Functional Accessibility Evaluator, http://fae.disability.illinois.edu, [03.06.2020].
Walidator Check My Colours, http://www.checkmycolours.com, [03.06.2020].
Badana strona urzędu miasta Lublin, http://lublin.eu, [03.06.2020].
Badana strona urzędu miasta Zamość, http://investin.zamosc.pl, [03.06.2020].
Badana strona urzędu pracy miasta Warszawa, http://wupwarszawa.praca.gov.pl, [03.06.2020].
Badana strona gminy Gorzków, http://gorzkow.eu, [03.06.2020].
Article Details
Abstract views: 352
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
