Comparative analysis of solutions used in Automated Testing of Internet Applications
Magdalena Psujek
magdalena.psujek@pollub.edu.plDepartment of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology (Poland)
Aleksandra Radzik
(Poland)
Grzegorz Kozieł
Lublin University of Technology (Poland)
Abstract
This article is devoted to the comparison of the effectiveness of solutions used in automatic testing of web applications. In order to carry out the analysis, test scenarios were created and tests were carried out using each of the tested programming frameworks (Selenium WebDriver, Cucumber, Ranorex, Robot Framework, Cypress, Unified Functional Testing, TestComplete and Katalon Studio). The study showed that there is no single best tool that meets all the requirements. Taking into account the analyzed aspects of effectiveness, the TestComplete program was the best, however, when choosing a solution, the team's skills and project specification should be taken into account.
Keywords:
automated testing, testing frameworksReferences
R. Dahiya, A. Shahid, Importance of manual and automation testing. 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2019.91719
Google Scholar
P. Kunte, D. Mane. Automation Testing of Web based application with Selenium and HP UFT (QTP). International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET). 2017
Google Scholar
Automatyzacja testów musi być przemyślana. https://www.computerworld.pl/news/Automatyzacja-testow-musi-byc-przemyslana,381609.html [17.03.2020]
Google Scholar
Stowarzyszenie Jakości Systemów Informatycznych. Certyfikowany tester. Sylabus poziomu podstawowego certyfikatu ISTQB 2018. Wersja 1.0.1. 2019
Google Scholar
H. V. Gamido, M. V. Gamido, Comparative review of the features of automated software testing tools. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE). 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i5.pp4473-4478
Google Scholar
A. S. Gadwal, L. Prasad,Comparative review of the literature of automated testing tools. 2020
Google Scholar
D. Raghuvanshi, Introduction to Software Testing. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD). 2020
Google Scholar
D. Chelimsky, D. Astels, Z. Dennis, A. Hellesøy, B. Helmkamp, D. North, The RSpec Book: Behaviour-Driven Development with RSpec, Cucumber, and Friends. The Pragmatic Bookshelf. 2012
Google Scholar
Umar M. A., Zhanfang C.. A Study of Automated Software Testing: Automation Tools and Frameworks. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering (IJCSE). 2019
Google Scholar
Wac A. D., Watras T. K., Kozieł G.. Analiza porównawcza rozwiązań wykorzystywanych w testowaniu automatycznym. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute. 2020
Google Scholar
Qassim H.. Testing Web Applications. SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering. 2019
Google Scholar
Koszty i wartość automatyzacji. https://testerzy.pl/baza-wiedzy/koszty-i-wartosc-automatyzacji [20.06.2020]
Google Scholar
Marek P.. Weryfikacja i automatyzacja procesu testowania oprogramowania. C0RE Magazine. 2011
Google Scholar
10 najlepszych narzędzi automatyzacji testów. https://testerzy.pl/narzedzia/10-najlepszych-narzedzi-automatyzacji-testow [20.06.2020]
Google Scholar
Top 10 Automation Testing Tools in 2020. https://www.netsolutions.com/insights/top-10-automation-testing-tools/[20.06.2020]
Google Scholar
Authors
Magdalena Psujekmagdalena.psujek@pollub.edu.pl
Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology Poland
Authors
Aleksandra RadzikPoland
Authors
Grzegorz KoziełLublin University of Technology Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 532PDF downloads: 405
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
