Comparison of frameworks for creating web services using the Axis2/C and gSOAP examples
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 18 (2021)
-
Natural interfaces in VR - comparative analysis
Dawid Majdanik, Adrian Madoń, Tomasz Szymczyk1-6
-
Comparative analysis of solutions used in Automated Testing of Internet Applications
Magdalena Psujek, Aleksandra Radzik, Grzegorz Kozieł7-14
-
Evaluation of the Kinect controller precision
Piotr Mieszawski, Tomasz Szymczyk15-21
-
Analysis of modern human-computer interfaces
Michał Cioczek, Tomasz Czarnota, Tomasz Szymczyk22-29
-
Comparative analysis of tools for the integration of IT systems
Narzędzia do integracji systemów informatycznych - analiza porównawczaVladyslav Shkuta, Marek Miłosz30-36 -
Comparison of frameworks for creating web services using the Axis2/C and gSOAP examples
Roman Bondarev, Beata Pańczyk37-41
-
The comparative analysis of web applications frameworks in the Node.js ecosystem
Bartosz Miłosierny, Mariusz Dzieńkowski42-48
-
Human-social interaction robots to improve shared attention in children with autism
Ali Ashrafi49-54
-
Selection of the type of cooling for an overclocked Raspberry Pi 4B minicomputer processor operating at maximum load conditions
Jakub Machowski, Mariusz Dzieńkowski55-60
-
Comparison of the performance of relational databases PostgreSQL and MySQL for desktop application
Bartłomiej Klimek, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska61-66
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Main purpose of this paper was to compare two frameworks (Axis2/C and gSOAP) that implement the SOAP protocol, a protocol for the exchange of structured messages in a computer environment. The paper describes experiments showing the level of SOAP performance depending on the components of each framework and the methods of their implementation, such as: parsing, serialisation, working with various message formats, the effectiveness of protocol, the efficiency of message processing models, etc. After the practical part was completed, performance studies of each of the frameworks were carried out, the collected data helped to define a more efficient and faster tool for transferring data between the server and the client.
Keywords:
References
Lista popularnych frameworków protokołu SOAP, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_service_frameworks, [4.09.2020].
Szkody spowodowane opóźnieniem przesyłania usług internetowych, https://www.coxblue.com/7-ways-slow-internet-speeds-are-hurting-your-business/, [6.09.2020].
T. Flach, N. Dukkipati, A. Terzis, B. Raghavan, N. Cardwell, Y. Cheng, A. Jain, S. Hao, E. Katz-Bassett, R. Govindan, Reducing Web Latency: The Virtue of Gentle Aggression, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2486001.2486014
AXIOM, https://ws.apache.org/axiom/, [10.10.2020].
Model obiektowy AXIOM, https://www.ibm.com/ developerworks/ru/library/ws-java2/index.html, [25.10.2020].
Dokumentacja Axis, https://axis.apache.org/axis2/ java/core/apidocs/org/apache/axis2/jaxws/util/WSDL4JWrapper.html, [25.10.2020].
M. R. Head, Benchmarking XML processors for applications in grid web services, IEEE, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2006.14
J. Kangasharju, S. Tarkoma, K. Raatikainen, Comparing SOAP Performance for Various Encodings, Protocols, and Connections, DBLP, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39867-7_38
Serializacja i deserializacja, https://isocpp.org/wiki/ faq/serialization, [1.10.2020].
Opisy różnych realizacji protokołu TCP/IP, http://book.itep.ru/4/44/tcp.htm#8, [10.10.2020].
Article Details
Abstract views: 346
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
