Comparative analysis of performance of ASP.NET Core MVC and Symfony 4 programming frameworks
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 19 (2021)
-
Comparison of WebSocket and HTTP protocol performance
Wojciech Łasocha, Marcin Badurowicz67-74
-
Comparative analysis of JavaScript package managers - yarn and npm
Michał Chodorowski75-80
-
Accessibility assessment of selected university websites
Wojciech Stasiak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski81-88
-
REST and GraphQL comparative analysis
Piotr Margański, Beata Pańczyk89-94
-
Comparative analysis of performance of ASP.NET Core MVC and Symfony 4 programming frameworks
Marcin Górski, Wojciech Andrzej Piwowarski, Mariusz Dzieńkowski95-99
-
Comparative analysis of frameworks used in automated testing on example of TestNG and WebdriverIO
Alla Shtokal, Jakub Smołka100-106
-
A multi-criteria comparison of mobile applications built with the use of Android and Flutter Software Development Kits
Damian Gałan, Konrad Fisz, Piotr Kopniak107-113
-
Evaluation of the availability of websites of communes in the Lubelskie Province
Michał Bednarczyk, Mariusz Dzieńkowski114-120
-
REST API performance comparison of web applications based on JavaScript programming frameworks
Marcin Grudniak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski121-125
-
The comparative analysis of modern ETL tools
Vitalii Mayuk, Ivan Falchuk, Piotr Muryjas126-131
-
Compilation of iOS frameworks from Linux operating system using open- source tools
Łukasz Rutkowski, Piotr Kopniak132-138
-
Performance analysis of Svelte and Angular applications
Gabriel Białecki, Beata Pańczyk139-143
-
Model of the text classification system using fuzzy sets
Dmytro Salahor, Jakub Smołka144-150
-
Analysis of the possibilities of optimizing SQL queries
Piotr Rymarski, Grzegorz Kozieł151-158
-
Comparison of lightweight frameworks for Java by analyzing proprietary web applications
Michał Błaszczyk, Marek Pucek, Piotr Kopniak159-164
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
wojciech.piwowarski1@pollub.edu.pl
Abstract
The article presents a comparative analysis of popular ASP.NET Core MVC and Symfony 4 frameworks. Two web applications, containing the same functionalities and acting as a simple system for managing articles, were implemented in these technologies. The applications underwent time performance tests during typical operations performed by means of a simple form such as entering, editing, viewing and deleting data. These actions were performed automatically using commands from the Puppeteer library. The listed operations were repeated 10, 100 and 1,000 times in order to obtain precise mean times. On the basis of the obtained results, it was difficult to clearly state which of the compared programming tools is better. The ASP.NET Core MVC framework coped much better with two time-consuming operations, i.e. entering and editing data. Its results in this regard (the average from 1,000 repetitions) were respectively approximately 28% and 25% better compared to the Symphony 4 framework. However, for the two less time-consuming operations, i.e. displaying and deleting articles, the Symphony 4 framework proved to be considerably better. Its results with regard to displaying and deleting articles (the average for 1,000 measurements) were respectively 15% and 36% lower compared to the other of the tested frameworks.
Keywords:
References
Tiobe, https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/, [16.02.2021].
Google Trends, https://trends.google.pl/trends/, [16.02.2021].
A. D. Wac, T. K. Watras, G. Kozieł, Comparative analysis of solutions used in automated testing, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 15, 156-163, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2048
SMARTBEAR, Test Automation Best Practices, https://smartbear.com/learn/automated-testing/best-practices-for-automation/, [16.02.2021].
Symfony, https://symfony.com/, [16.02.2021].
Introduction to ASP.NET Core, https://docs.microsoft.com/pl-pl/aspnet/core/introduction-to-aspnet-core?view=aspnetcore-5.0, [16.02.2021].
OVHCloud, https://www.ovh.pl/, [16.02.2021].
Puppeteer, https://developers.google.com/web/tools/puppeteer, [16.02.2021].
Article Details
Abstract views: 695
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
