Comparative analysis of frameworks used in automated testing on example of TestNG and WebdriverIO
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 19 (2021)
-
Comparison of WebSocket and HTTP protocol performance
Wojciech Łasocha, Marcin Badurowicz67-74
-
Comparative analysis of JavaScript package managers - yarn and npm
Michał Chodorowski75-80
-
Accessibility assessment of selected university websites
Wojciech Stasiak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski81-88
-
REST and GraphQL comparative analysis
Piotr Margański, Beata Pańczyk89-94
-
Comparative analysis of performance of ASP.NET Core MVC and Symfony 4 programming frameworks
Marcin Górski, Wojciech Andrzej Piwowarski, Mariusz Dzieńkowski95-99
-
Comparative analysis of frameworks used in automated testing on example of TestNG and WebdriverIO
Alla Shtokal, Jakub Smołka100-106
-
A multi-criteria comparison of mobile applications built with the use of Android and Flutter Software Development Kits
Damian Gałan, Konrad Fisz, Piotr Kopniak107-113
-
Evaluation of the availability of websites of communes in the Lubelskie Province
Michał Bednarczyk, Mariusz Dzieńkowski114-120
-
REST API performance comparison of web applications based on JavaScript programming frameworks
Marcin Grudniak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski121-125
-
The comparative analysis of modern ETL tools
Vitalii Mayuk, Ivan Falchuk, Piotr Muryjas126-131
-
Compilation of iOS frameworks from Linux operating system using open- source tools
Łukasz Rutkowski, Piotr Kopniak132-138
-
Performance analysis of Svelte and Angular applications
Gabriel Białecki, Beata Pańczyk139-143
-
Model of the text classification system using fuzzy sets
Dmytro Salahor, Jakub Smołka144-150
-
Analysis of the possibilities of optimizing SQL queries
Piotr Rymarski, Grzegorz Kozieł151-158
-
Comparison of lightweight frameworks for Java by analyzing proprietary web applications
Michał Błaszczyk, Marek Pucek, Piotr Kopniak159-164
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The article presents a comparative analysis of frameworks supporting the development of automated tests for defined test scenarios. The comparative study concerned the TestNG and WebDriverIO frameworks. The overview of the tool has been analyzed both in terms of the test development process as well as the speed and efficiency of their execution. The website github.com was used for the purposes of the work. This application was used to run test scripts written in both frameworks. The results were compared by five defined criteria: the time of running the test files in different browser operation modes, the average value of memory and CPU usage during the test execution. The summary includes the evaluation of the compared frameworks.
Keywords:
References
T. J. Naidu, N. A. Basri, S. Nagenthram, “Selenium: A comparative analysis,” 2014 Internet Conference Contempt Computer Informatics, IC3I 2014, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I.2014.7019594
S. Jagannatha, et al, Comparative Study on Automation Testing using Selenium Testing Framework and QTP, International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 3(10) (2014) 258-267.
Wac, T. Watras, G. Kozieł, Analiza porównawcza rozwiązań wykorzystywanych w testowaniu automatycznym, 2019.
S. Jagannatha, et al, Comparative Study on Automation Testing using Selenium Testing Framework and QTP International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 3(10) (2014) 258-267.
M. Meiliana, I. Septian, R.S. Alianto, Daniel.. Comparison Analysis of Android GUI Testing Frameworks by Using an Experimental Study, Procedia Computer Science, 135 (2018) 736–748, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.211
S.M. Srinivasan, R.S. Sangwan, Web App Security: A Comparison and Categorization of Testing Frameworks, IEEE Software, 34(1) (2017) 99–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2017.21
S. Sharma, “Study and analysis of automation testing techniques,” J. Global Research Computer Science, 3(12) (2012) 36-43.
V. N. Maurya, E. R. Kumar, Analytical Study on Manual vs. Automated Testing Using with Simplistic Cost Model, 2012.
K. Bahl, Software Testing Tools Techniques for Web Applications, 2015.
Article Details
Abstract views: 649
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
