A multi-criteria comparison of mobile applications built with the use of Android and Flutter Software Development Kits
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 19 (2021)
-
Comparison of WebSocket and HTTP protocol performance
Wojciech Łasocha, Marcin Badurowicz67-74
-
Comparative analysis of JavaScript package managers - yarn and npm
Michał Chodorowski75-80
-
Accessibility assessment of selected university websites
Wojciech Stasiak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski81-88
-
REST and GraphQL comparative analysis
Piotr Margański, Beata Pańczyk89-94
-
Comparative analysis of performance of ASP.NET Core MVC and Symfony 4 programming frameworks
Marcin Górski, Wojciech Andrzej Piwowarski, Mariusz Dzieńkowski95-99
-
Comparative analysis of frameworks used in automated testing on example of TestNG and WebdriverIO
Alla Shtokal, Jakub Smołka100-106
-
A multi-criteria comparison of mobile applications built with the use of Android and Flutter Software Development Kits
Damian Gałan, Konrad Fisz, Piotr Kopniak107-113
-
Evaluation of the availability of websites of communes in the Lubelskie Province
Michał Bednarczyk, Mariusz Dzieńkowski114-120
-
REST API performance comparison of web applications based on JavaScript programming frameworks
Marcin Grudniak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski121-125
-
The comparative analysis of modern ETL tools
Vitalii Mayuk, Ivan Falchuk, Piotr Muryjas126-131
-
Compilation of iOS frameworks from Linux operating system using open- source tools
Łukasz Rutkowski, Piotr Kopniak132-138
-
Performance analysis of Svelte and Angular applications
Gabriel Białecki, Beata Pańczyk139-143
-
Model of the text classification system using fuzzy sets
Dmytro Salahor, Jakub Smołka144-150
-
Analysis of the possibilities of optimizing SQL queries
Piotr Rymarski, Grzegorz Kozieł151-158
-
Comparison of lightweight frameworks for Java by analyzing proprietary web applications
Michał Błaszczyk, Marek Pucek, Piotr Kopniak159-164
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This publication presents a multi-criteria comparison of two mobile applications built with the use of Android and Flutter SDK. The former has been implemented with Kotlin and the latter with Dart. The benchmarking process examines factors such as execution time and CPU usage during data and disk operations. During the analysis, attention was paid to the length and volume the source code, community support and the availability of libraries. The comparative analysis shows that a mobile application written using Android SDK is often not only faster and more efficient, but also has greater community support and the number of libraries available. In addition, an analysis of the source code volume showed that Flutter has more concise but more difficult to navigate code than Android.
Keywords:
References
M. A. Khaled, R. S. Tariq, S. Khaled, Mobile Gaming Trends and Revenue Models, Springer International Publishing (2016).
M. Naldi, Concentration in the mobile operating systems market, Universit‘y of Rome Tor Vergata (2016).
M. Napoli, Beginning Flutter: A Hands On Guide to App Development, John Wiley & Sons, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119550860
D. Sulowski, G. Kozieł, Analiza porównawcza języków Kotlin i Java używanych do tworzenia aplikacji na system Android, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute 13 (2019) 354-358. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.1332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.1332
P. Kotarski, K. Śledź, J. Smołka, Analiza wydajności aplikacji mobilnych przy zastosowaniu różnych narzędzi programistycznych do ich budowy, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute 6 (2018) 68-72. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.642
D. Dobrzański, W. Zabierowski, The comparison of native apps performance on iOS (Swift) and Android with cross-platform application - Xamarin: student project, International Journal of Microelectronics and Computer Science 8 (2018) 112-116.
P. Grzmil, M. Skublewska-Paszkowska, E. Łukasik, J. Smołka, Performance analysis of native and cross-platform mobile applications, Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska 7 (2017) 50-53. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.4838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.4838
Article Details
Abstract views: 1284
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
