Comparative analysis of Unity and Unreal Engine efficiency in creating virtual exhibitions of 3D scanned models

Agata Ciekanowska


Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology (Poland)

Adam Kiszczak - Gliński

adam.kiszczak-glinski@pollub.edu.pl
Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)

Krzysztof Dziedzic


Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)

Abstract

The main purpose of this work was to compare two game engines (Unreal Engine and Unity) in creating virtual exhibitions. The article is a scientific description of a test of their efficiency. For the needs of the research two identical test applications built on the basis of the same assets were created. Those applications enabled researchers to examine and compare the efficiency of engines in question, as well as familiarizing themselves with the workflow on each platform. The comparative analysis of gathered data let more effective solution to emerge, which happens to be Unity engine.


Keywords:

virtual museum, 3D models, game engines, comparative analysis

F. Antinucci, The virtual museum, Archeologia e Calcolatori, supplemento, 1 (2007) 79- , http://www.archcalc.cnr.it/indice/Suppl_1/6_Antinucci.pdf [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

J. Derwisz, Współczesne technologie multimedialne w wirtualnej rekonstrukcji oraz prezentacji historycznych obiektów architektonicznych, Wiadomości Konserwatorskie, 34 (2013) 82-91, http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-909a5d65-29b1-46fd-bfa5-3c76fb7efac1/c/Derwisz.pdf [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

J. Kęsik, J. Montusiewicz, R. Kayumov, An approach to computer-aided reconstruction of museum exhibits, Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal, 11 (2017) 87-94, http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-73ba2929-b9ff-4741-978b-bf780441dd3f/c/kesik.pdf [02.07.2021].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/69419   Google Scholar

A. Šmíd, Comparison of Unity and Unreal Engine, Bachelor Thesis, Czech Technical University, Prague, 2017, https://dcgi.fel.cvut.cz/theses/2017/smidanto [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

K. Siarkowski, P. Sprawka, M. Plechawska-Wójcik, Metody optymalizacji wydajności silnika Unity 3D
  Google Scholar

w oparciu o grę z widokiem perspektywy trzeciej osoby, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 3 (2017) 46-53, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.592 [02.07.2021].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.592   Google Scholar

E. Puławski, M. Tokarski, Wykorzystanie postprocesingu i jego wpływu na wydajność renderowania w silniku Unreal Engine 4, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 10 (2019) 54-61, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.206 [02.07.2021].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.206   Google Scholar

J. Haas, A History of the Unity Game Engine, An Interactive Qualifying Project, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, 2014, https://digital.wpi.edu/pdfviewer/2f75r821k [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

A. Szewczyk, Oczekiwania fanów elektronicznej rozrywki wobec grafiki w grach komputerowych, Studia Informatica Pomerania, 40 (2016) 71-85, http://wneiz.pl/nauka_wneiz/studia_inf/40-2016/si-40-71.pdf [02.07.2021].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/si.2016.40-07   Google Scholar

2021 Gaming Report - Unity insights from 2020 and predicted trends for 2021, https://images.response.unity3d.com/Web/Unity/%7B4645ad28-63a3-4348-bc5b-dc09f2811419%7D_Unity_2021-Gaming-Report.pdf [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

Research of the market share of game engines on Steam, from over 60,000 Steam games, https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8s20qp/i_researched_the_market_share_of_game_engines_on/ [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

Artec Space Spider, https://skanery3d.eu/skanery-3d/artec-spider/ [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

Artec 3D Technical specifications, https://www.artec3d.com/portable-3d-scanners/artec-spider-v2#specifications [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

M. J. Wachowiak, B. V. Karas, 3D Scanning and Replication for Museum and Cultural Heritage Applications, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 48 (2019) 54-61, https://www.si.edu/content/MCIImagingStudio/papers/scanning_paper.pdf [02.07.2021].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/019713609804516992   Google Scholar

A. Salwierz, T. Szymczyk, Metody wytwarzania realistycznych pomieszczeń – skanowanie 3D oraz modelowanie 3D, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 14 (2020) 101-108, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.1584 [02.07.2021].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.1584   Google Scholar

Unity - Level of Detail (LOD) for meshes, https://docs.unity3d.com/Manual/LevelOfDetail.html [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

Unreal Engine - Creating and Using LODs, https://docs.unrealengine.com/4.26/en-US/WorkingWithContent/Types/StaticMeshes/HowTo/LODs/ [02.07.2021].
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2021-09-30

Cited by

Ciekanowska, A., Kiszczak - Gliński, A., & Dziedzic, K. (2021). Comparative analysis of Unity and Unreal Engine efficiency in creating virtual exhibitions of 3D scanned models. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 20, 247–253. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2698

Authors

Agata Ciekanowska 

Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology Poland

Authors

Adam Kiszczak - Gliński 
adam.kiszczak-glinski@pollub.edu.pl
Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland

Authors

Krzysztof Dziedzic 

Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 1428
PDF downloads: 1009