Analysis of user experience during interaction with selected CMS platforms
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 21 (2021)
-
Comparison of selected mathematical functions for the analysis of growth behavior of items and physical interpretation of Avrami-Weibull function
Keshra Sangwal259-278
-
Comparison of classical machine learning algorithms in the task of handwritten digits classification
Oleksandr Voloshchenko, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik279-286
-
The comparative analysis of Java frameworks: Spring Boot, Micronaut and Quarkus
Maciej Jeleń, Mariusz Dzieńkowski287-294
-
Usability analysis taking into consideration the aspects of accessibility of selected university websites
Karol Kałan, Damian Karpiuk, Mariusz Dzieńkowski295-302
-
A comparison of conventional and deep learning methods of image classification
Maryna Dovbnych, Małgorzata Plechawska–Wójcik303-308
-
Comparative analysis of connection performance with databases via JDBC interface and ORM programming frameworks
Mateusz Żuchnik, Piotr Kopniak309-315
-
Examination of text's lexis using a Polish dictionary
Roman Voitovych, Edyta Łukasik316-323
-
Comparison of capabilities of the Unity environment and LibGDX in terms of computer game development
Piotr Kosidło, Karol Kowalczyk, Marcin Badurowicz324-329
-
Performance analysis of the TensorFlow library with different optimisation algorithms
Maciej Wadas, Jakub Smołka330-335
-
Analysis of user experience during interaction with selected CMS platforms
Michał Miszczak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski336-343
-
Analysis of polish community on streaming platform twitch.tv during COVID-19 epidemy
Kamil Jeżowski, Marcin Badurowicz344-348
-
A study of the user experience when interacting with applications that work with sports armbands to monitor human activity
Mateusz Kiryczuk, Paweł Kocyła, Mariusz Dzieńkowski349-355
-
Performance comparison of programming interfaces on the example of REST API, GraphQL and gRPC
Mariusz Śliwa, Beata Pańczyk356-361
-
Digital entertainment in the face of COVID-19
Adam Jarszak362-366
-
Symfony and Laravel – a comparative analysis of PHP programming frameworks
Krzysztof Kuflewski, Mariusz Dzieńkowski367-372
-
A comparative analysis of cryptocurrency wallet management tools
Kamil Biernacki, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik373-377
-
Analysis of data storage methods available in the Android SDK
Dominika Kornaś378-382
-
An analysis of the possibility of realization steganography in C#
Piotr Pawlak, Jakub Podgórniak, Grzegorz Kozieł383-390
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The purpose of this study was assessing user experience while working with two popular CMS systems: WordPress and PrestaShop. The evaluation was done using a questionnaire and an eye tracking technique. Average task completion time, the number of fixations, the percentage of correctly completed tasks and the SUS index were used for comparisons. On the basis of the obtained results which, were collected during and after the users' interaction with a given system, it is difficult to clearly state which CMS proved to be better.
Keywords:
References
D. Barker, Web Content Management: Systems, Features, and Best Practices, O’Reilly, 2016.
T. Tullis, B. Albert, Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Elsevier, 2008.
M. Nilsson, UX method development from Usability testing with Eye tracking for E-commerce, 2018.
M. H. Ibrahim, Usability Comparison Of Open Source Content Management Systems, 2014, https://lutpub.lut.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/98501/Msc_Mohamed_Ibrahim0319444.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y, [25.11.2020].
R. Bos, J. Gurp, J. H. Verpoorten, S. Brinkkemper, Heuristic Evaluation Of Content Management Systems: Cms Specific Heuristics, Published in P. Isaias and M.B. Nunes (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2005, II, 247-254, 2005.
S. Gilani, A. Majeed, M. Muzammal, A.U. Rehman, H. Zaheer, Z. Jan, A Navigational Evaluation Model for Content Management Systems, The Nucleus 53, 2 82-88, 2016.
A. Bojko, Using Eye Tracking to Compare Web Page Designs: A Case Study, A Case Study, Journal of Usability Studies, 3(1), 112-120, 2006.
P. Weichbroth, K. Redlarski, I. Garnik, Eye-tracking Web Usability Research, Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Scienceand Information Systems, 1681–1684, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15439/2016F127
W. Wong, M. Bartels, N. Chrobot, Practical Eye Tracking of the Ecommerce Website User Experience, International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction UAHCI 2014: Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design for All and Accessibility Practice, 109-118, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07509-9_11
Y. Herawati, S. Halim, C. Tesavrita, Evaluasi Website Rakuten Indonesia dengan Eyetracking Usability Testing, Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 5(1), 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26593/jrsi.v5i1.1914.60-68
Statystyka wykorzystania systemów typu open source na stronach WWW w Polsce, https://trends.builtwith.com/cms/open-source/country/Poland, [26.08.2021].
Oficjalna strona WordPress Polska, https://pl.wordpress.org/, [04.06.2021].
Oficjalna strona PrestaShop Polska, https://www.prestashop.com/pl, [04.06.2021].
Gazepoint: https://www.gazept.com/product/gp3hd/, [09.09.2021].
iMotions, https://imotions.com/, [09.09.2021].
SurveyLab, Skala Użyteczności Systemu (SUS), https://www.surveylab.com/pl/blog/skala-uzytecznosci-systemu-sus/, [09.09.2021].
Article Details
Abstract views: 448
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
