A study of the user experience when interacting with applications that work with sports armbands to monitor human activity
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 21 (2021)
-
Comparison of selected mathematical functions for the analysis of growth behavior of items and physical interpretation of Avrami-Weibull function
Keshra Sangwal259-278
-
Comparison of classical machine learning algorithms in the task of handwritten digits classification
Oleksandr Voloshchenko, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik279-286
-
The comparative analysis of Java frameworks: Spring Boot, Micronaut and Quarkus
Maciej Jeleń, Mariusz Dzieńkowski287-294
-
Usability analysis taking into consideration the aspects of accessibility of selected university websites
Karol Kałan, Damian Karpiuk, Mariusz Dzieńkowski295-302
-
A comparison of conventional and deep learning methods of image classification
Maryna Dovbnych, Małgorzata Plechawska–Wójcik303-308
-
Comparative analysis of connection performance with databases via JDBC interface and ORM programming frameworks
Mateusz Żuchnik, Piotr Kopniak309-315
-
Examination of text's lexis using a Polish dictionary
Roman Voitovych, Edyta Łukasik316-323
-
Comparison of capabilities of the Unity environment and LibGDX in terms of computer game development
Piotr Kosidło, Karol Kowalczyk, Marcin Badurowicz324-329
-
Performance analysis of the TensorFlow library with different optimisation algorithms
Maciej Wadas, Jakub Smołka330-335
-
Analysis of user experience during interaction with selected CMS platforms
Michał Miszczak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski336-343
-
Analysis of polish community on streaming platform twitch.tv during COVID-19 epidemy
Kamil Jeżowski, Marcin Badurowicz344-348
-
A study of the user experience when interacting with applications that work with sports armbands to monitor human activity
Mateusz Kiryczuk, Paweł Kocyła, Mariusz Dzieńkowski349-355
-
Performance comparison of programming interfaces on the example of REST API, GraphQL and gRPC
Mariusz Śliwa, Beata Pańczyk356-361
-
Digital entertainment in the face of COVID-19
Adam Jarszak362-366
-
Symfony and Laravel – a comparative analysis of PHP programming frameworks
Krzysztof Kuflewski, Mariusz Dzieńkowski367-372
-
A comparative analysis of cryptocurrency wallet management tools
Kamil Biernacki, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik373-377
-
Analysis of data storage methods available in the Android SDK
Dominika Kornaś378-382
-
An analysis of the possibility of realization steganography in C#
Piotr Pawlak, Jakub Podgórniak, Grzegorz Kozieł383-390
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This paper concerns the study of user experience and focuses on two aspects i.e. usability and user satisfaction. Two mobile applications for monitoring human activity, Mi Fit and Google Fit, were tested. Both applications work with sports armbands. Two methods were used for the study: a questionnaire and eye tracking. The comparison of the applications was made on the basis of the collected results from questionnaires, measurements of task completion times and the number and type of errors detected. Nine respondents participated in the study. The Google Fit application received a higher average score for user satisfaction, fewer errors and shorter task completion times.
Keywords:
References
S. Ambler, User Interface Design: Tips and Techniques, Toronto: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
J. Gao, X. Bai, W.T. Tsai, T. Uehara, Mobile Application Testing: A tutorial, (2014) 46-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.445
J. Seo, Y. Choi, J. Kwak, H. Kim, Y. Yoon, Mobile device of bangle type, control method thereof and user interface (UI) display method, Google Patents, 2017.
K. R. Evenson, M. M. Goto, R. D. Furberg , Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 12(159) 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1
B. Benet, Quantifying Sleep Quality with Smartband Technology, 2015. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2943.3448.
J. Park, Hyun-Seo Hwang, Il-Young Moon, Study of Wearable Smart Band for a User Motion Recognition System, International Journal of Smart Home 8(5) (2014) 33-44. DOI: 10.14257/ijsh.2014.8.5.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsh.2014.8.5.04
F. Fotouhi-Ghazvini, S. Abbaspour, Wearable Wireless Sensors for Measuring Calorie Consumption, Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors 10(1) (2020) 19-34. DOI: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_15_18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_15_18
A. Bojko, Eye tracking the user experience: A practical guide to research, Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media, 2013.
M. Borys, M. Milosz, Mobile Application Usability Testing in Quasi-Real Conditions. A Case Study of a Mobile Eye Tracker, 8th International Conference on Human System Interactions, IEEE (2015) 381-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2015.7170698
Pupil Labs, Pupil Invisible. Technical Specs & Performance, https://pupil-labs.com/products/invisible/
tech-specs/, [10.09.2021].
iMotions, https://imotions.com/, [10.09.2021].
M. Mussgnug, Q. Lohmeyer, M. Meboldt, Raising Designers' Awareness of User Experience by Mobile Eye Tracking Records, DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), University of Twente, The Netherlands (2014) 99-104.
Article Details
Abstract views: 360
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
