Comparison of selected configuration management systems in Linux
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 22 (2022)
-
Analysis of the impact of various gamification factors on the level of player satisfaction
Krystian Demidiuk, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik1-7
-
Comparative analysis of the time performance of database queries in C# language
Tomasz Nowicki, Sebastian Tomczak, Grzegorz Kozieł8-12
-
Comparison of selected configuration management systems in Linux
Szymon Dudziak, Natalia Jakubczak, Maciej Pańczyk13-17
-
Comparative analysis of PHP frameworks on the example of Laravel and Symfony
Paulina Garbarz, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik18-25
-
Comparison of frameworks for developing web applications in PHP
Kamil Pawelec, Piotr Kopniak26-34
-
Comparison of web application performance on the example of Laravel and Vaadin frameworks
Jakub Radomski35-39
-
Comparison of ASP.NET Core and Spring Boot ecosystems
Teofil Rozaliuk, Petro Kopyl, Jakub Smołka40-45
-
Tools for modeling and simulating business processes - a comparative analysis
Radosław Lipski, Dominik Lipski46-50
-
Comparative analysis of interface sketch design tools in the context of User Experience
Edyta Kowalczyk, Agnieszka Glinka, Tomasz Szymczyk51-58
-
Comparing the Performance of the Object-Relational Mapping Program-ming Frameworks Available in Java
Mateusz Połeć, Jakub Pitera, Grzegorz Kozieł59-65
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to compare selected configuration management systems on Linux. These systems had to meet the condition of integration with Linux. The two of the most popular systems were chosen which are Puppet and Ansible. The comparison was based on a simple system configuration using these two systems in several aspects: installation, file and folder management, package management, user management, configuration of the Apache server and Firewall. Through this comparison, it was possible to determine which system is more suitable for a novice Linux system administrator.
Keywords:
References
S. Thakur, S. C. Gupta, N. Singh, S. Geddam, Mitigating and patching system vulnerabilities using ansible: A comparative study of various configuration management tools for iaas cloud. In Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications, Springer New Delhi (2016) 21-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2755-7_3
F. Önnberg, Software Configuration Management: A comparison of Chef, CFEngine and Puppet, (2012) http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-6040.
F. Locati, Learning Ansible 2 – Second Edition, Packt Publishing Ltd., 2016.
J. Arundel, Puppet 5 Beginner’s Guide – Third Edition. Packt Publishing Ltd., 2017.
J. Grzabel , Puppet Vs Ansible, https://www.devopsgroup.com/blog/puppet-vs-ansible/, [13.07.2021].
A. Johari, Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack: Which Works Best For You?, https://www.edureka.co/blog/chef-vs-puppet-vs-ansible-vs-saltstack/, [13.07.2021].
Opis oraz pierwsze wydanie oprogramowania Ansible, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible_(software), [14.06.2021].
Opis oraz pierwsze wydanie oprogramowania Puppet, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puppet_(software), [14.06.2021].
E. Nemeth, G. Snyder, T. R. Hein, T. Adelstein, B. Lubanovic, T. Limoncelli, UNIX i Linux przewodnik administratora linux. Rozdział 23, Helion, 2018.
Article Details
Abstract views: 457
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
