Comparing the Performance of the Object-Relational Mapping Program-ming Frameworks Available in Java
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 22 (2022)
-
Analysis of the impact of various gamification factors on the level of player satisfaction
Krystian Demidiuk, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik1-7
-
Comparative analysis of the time performance of database queries in C# language
Tomasz Nowicki, Sebastian Tomczak, Grzegorz Kozieł8-12
-
Comparison of selected configuration management systems in Linux
Szymon Dudziak, Natalia Jakubczak, Maciej Pańczyk13-17
-
Comparative analysis of PHP frameworks on the example of Laravel and Symfony
Paulina Garbarz, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik18-25
-
Comparison of frameworks for developing web applications in PHP
Kamil Pawelec, Piotr Kopniak26-34
-
Comparison of web application performance on the example of Laravel and Vaadin frameworks
Jakub Radomski35-39
-
Comparison of ASP.NET Core and Spring Boot ecosystems
Teofil Rozaliuk, Petro Kopyl, Jakub Smołka40-45
-
Tools for modeling and simulating business processes - a comparative analysis
Radosław Lipski, Dominik Lipski46-50
-
Comparative analysis of interface sketch design tools in the context of User Experience
Edyta Kowalczyk, Agnieszka Glinka, Tomasz Szymczyk51-58
-
Comparing the Performance of the Object-Relational Mapping Program-ming Frameworks Available in Java
Mateusz Połeć, Jakub Pitera, Grzegorz Kozieł59-65
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The paper concerns a performance evaluation of selected object-relational mapping tools. This work is intended to assist software architects in determining which of the analyzed libraries will be the optimal choice for use in a specific project. The work includes the comparison of Hibernate ORM, EclipseLink, Apache OpenJPA and DataNucleus libraries from the theoretical and practical point of view. Each of the examined tools has been described according to criteria allowing to distinguish the most important features influencing communication with relational databases. These features will then be compared on a practical level by examining the behavior of the test applications. In terms of performance, the Apache OpenJPA library turned out to be the best, but in terms of configuration and availability it significantly differs from other libraries. This was caused by an unintuitive configuration and poor documentation of the technology. In this respect, the Hibernate library definitely dominated, the configuration of which with the Spring programming framework was simple and intuitive, and the documentation was rich and supported by an extensive community of programmers using it.
Keywords:
References
J. M. Barnes, Object-relational mapping as a persistence mechanism for object-oriented applications, Macalester College, 2007.
S. N. Bhatti, Z. H. Abro, F. Rufabro, Performance evaluation of java based object relational mapping tool, Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 32(2) (2013) 159-166.
P. Błoch, M. Wojciechowski, Analiza porównawcza technologii odwzorowania obiektowo-relacyjnego dla aplikacji Java. XIII Konferencja PLOUG: Systemy informatyczne. Projektowanie, implementowanie, eksploatowanie, Zakopane, 2007.
B. B. Correa, Y. Wang, E. Zimanyi, Object-relational mapping tools and Hibernate, Universite libre de Bruxelles, 2017.
N. Dhingra, Analysis of ORM based JPA Implementations, University of Ottawa, 2017.
C. Bauer, K. Gavin, G. Gary, Java Persistence. Programowanie aplikacji bazodanowych w Hibernate. Wydanie II, Helion, 2016.
Dokumentacja techniczna biblioteki ORM Eclipselink https://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/documentation, [22.10.2021].
Dokumentacja techniczna biblioteki ORM Apache OpenJPA, http://openjpa.apache.org/documentation.html, [22.10.2021].
Dokumentacja techniczna biblioteki ORM DataNucleus, https://www.datanucleus.org/products/accessplatform_6_0/, [22.10.2021]
K. Appigatla, MySQL 8 Cookbook, Packt Publishing, 2018.
J. Bloch, Java. Efektywne programowanie. Wydanie III, Helion, 2018.
S. Raemaekers, A. Van Deursen, J. Visser, The maven repository dataset of metrics, changes, and dependencies, 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (2013) 221-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2013.6624031
Article Details
Abstract views: 648
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
