Performance comparison between selected chess engines
Abstract
Selected chess engines were compared to each other in terms of performance, using Lucas Chess. The list of engines was cut into three categories, depending on strength in ELO points. The point of this study is to find the strongest and the lightest engines in each category. Then, each category was tested using three different starting positions. White, black and overall wins were highlighted. At the same time, data of CPU and RAM usage of each engine was collected. A script was developed to print CPU and RAM usage of a specific process. Maximum and average percent of used CPU thread and RAM were highlighted. Chess engines with most amount of wins were, from weakest to strongest: Bikjump, Rybka and Stockfish. Least amount of system resources was consumed by: Cinnamon, Demolito and Critter.
Keywords:
chess, chess engines, performance comparisonReferences
A. Elo, The Proposed USCF Rating System, Its Development, Theory, and Applications, Chess Life 22 (1967) 242-247.
Google Scholar
International Chess Federation - strona główna, https://www.fide.com/, [25.05.2022].
Google Scholar
V. V. Vučković, Realization of the Chess Mate Solver Application., Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research 14 (2004) 273-288, https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR0402273V.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR0402273V
Google Scholar
W. B. Putra, L. Heryawan, Applying Alpha-beta Algorithm In A Chess Engine, Jurnal Teknosains UGM 6 (2016) 37-43.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/teknosains.11380
Google Scholar
H. Zang, Z. Yu, X. Wan, Automated chess commentator powered by neural chess engine, arXiv (2019), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.10413.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1597
Google Scholar
M. Block, M. Bader, E. Tapia, M. Ramírez, K. Gunnarsson, E. Cuevas, D. Zaldivar, R. Rojas, Using Reinforcement Learning in Chess Engines, Research in Computing Science 35 (2008) 31-40.
Google Scholar
N. Hesham, O. Abu-Elnasr, S. Elmougy, A New Action-Based Reasoning Approach for Playing Chess, Computers, Materials and Continua 69 (2021) 175-190.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.015168
Google Scholar
S. K. Bimonugroho, N. U. Maulidevi, A Hybrid Approach to Representing Chessboard using Bitboard and Compact Chessboard Representation, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 803 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/803/1/012018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/803/1/012018
Google Scholar
S. Maharaj, N. Polson, A. Turk, Chess AI: Competing Paradigms for Machine Intelligence, Entropy 24 (2022) 550, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.11602.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e24040550
Google Scholar
Strona internetowa programu Lucas Chess, https://lucaschess.pythonanywhere.com/home, [25.05.2022].
Google Scholar
Magiczne tablice bitów - definicja, https://www.chessprogramming.org/Magic_Bitboards, [25.05.2022].
Google Scholar
Leniwe SMP - definicja, https://www.chessprogramming.org/Lazy_SMP, [25.05.2022].
Google Scholar
Okno aspiracji - definicja, https://www.chessprogramming.org/Aspiration_Windows, [25.05.2022].
Google Scholar
Mistrzostwa ACCA World Computer Rapid Chess Championship 2016, https://www.chessprogramming.org/WCRCC_2016, [25.05.2022].
Google Scholar
B. Steinbach, M. Werner, XBOOLE-CUDA -- Fast Boolean Operations on the GPU (2014).
Google Scholar
Double bongcloud: why grandmasters are playing the worst move in chess, https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2021/mar/18/bongcloud-meme-opening-carlsen-nakamura, [20.06.2022]
Google Scholar
Biblioteka psutil - dokumentacja, https://psutil.readthedocs.io/en/latest/, [25.05.2022].
Google Scholar
Statistics
Abstract views: 319PDF downloads: 255
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
