A comparative analysis of tools dedicated to project management

Piotr Pawłowski; Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik

doi:10.35784/jcsi.3001

Open full text

PDF

Published: Sep 30, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3001

Issue Vol. 24 (2022)

Articles

Learning speed or prediction accuracy? Comparative analysis of program-ming frameworks for artificial intelligence
Konrad Zdeb, Piotr Żukiewicz, Edyta Łukasik

172-175
Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, Nikto and Skipfish in testing the security of web applications
Aleksandra Kondraciuk, Aleksandra Bartos, Beata Pańczyk

176-180
Comparative analysis of the functionality and quality of the interface of chosen applications for ordering food
Maciej Gieroba, Marek Miłosz

181-188
Comparative analysis of the quality of recorded sound in the function of different recording formats
Andrzej Król, Tomasz Szymczyk

189-194
Comparison of the most popular operating systems in terms of functionalities
Jacek Lato, Marek Mucha, Tomasz Szymczyk

195-202
Analysis of the medical personnel's views on keeping records in an electronic form
Maciej Mikrut

203-209
Analysis of the functionality of voice and video communication systems
Aleksandra Piątkowska

210-217
Comparative analysis of the Cycles and Eevee graphics engines on the example of rendering 3D models of archaeological artifacts
Sebastian Dudek, Krzysztof Dziedzic

218-223
Comparative analysis of React, Next and Gatsby programming frameworks for creating SPA applications
Adam Świątkowski, Karol Ścibior

224-227
Performance comparison between selected chess engines
Maciej Sojka

228-235
Comparison of the offer of selected cloud service providers from the point of view of implementing IT projects based on open code
Porównanie ofert wybranych dostawców usług chmurowych z punktu wi-dzenia realizacji projektów informatycznych opartych o otwarty kod
Jan Baran, Sławomir Przyłucki

236-241
Comparative analysis of reactive and imperative approach in Java web application development
Sebastian Iwanowski, Grzegorz Kozieł

242-249
Performance analysis of relational databases MySQL, PostgreSQL and Oracle using Doctrine libraries
Marcin Choina, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska

250-257
A comparative analysis of tools dedicated to project management
Piotr Pawłowski; Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik

258-264
Performance analysis of Laravel and Yii2 frameworks based on the MVC architectural pattern and PHP language
Konrad Sławomir Węgrzecki, Mariusz Dzieńkowski

265-272
Comparative analysis of Java and Dart programming languages in terms of suitability for creating mobile applications
Łukasz Kozłowski, Grzegorz Kozieł

273-279

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3001

Authors

Piotr Pawłowski

piotr.pawlowski@pollub.edu.pl

Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Poland

Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik

m.plechawska@pollub.pl

Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Poland

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of selected tools dedicated to project management: Asana, Trello, Wrike, Monday.com and Bitrix24. The aim of the work is to answer the research question: which project management tool is the most appropriate for members of development teams using classic and agile methodologies. Popular methods for analyzing the quality of interfaces have been reviewed. The research was carried out using the survey method conducted among users using project management tools and cognitive walkthrough - a method used to assess the usability of application and website interfaces.

Keywords:

project management; interface usability analysis; cognitive walkthrough; LUT’s list

References

T. L. Fox, J. W. Spence, Tools of the trade: A survey of project management tools, Project Management Journal 29(3) (1998) 20-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289802900305

P. Patanakul, B. Iewwongcharoen, D. Milosevic, An empirical study on the use of project management tools and techniques across project life-cycle and their impact on project success, Journal of General management 35(3) (2010) 41-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030630701003500304

A. Mishra, D. Mishra, Software project management tools: a brief comparative view, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 38(3) (2013) 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2464526.2464537

D. Özkan, A. Mishra, Agile Project Management Tools: A Brief Comprative View, Cybernetics and Information Technologies 19(4) (2019) 17-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2019-0033

Metoda PMBOK, https://inzynieria.com/budownictwo/wiadomosci/55874,metoda-zarzadzania-pmbok-dlaczego-warto-ja-wdrozyc-w-kazdej-firmie, [03.05.2022].

R. Q. Gonçalves, C. G. Von Wangenheim, An instructional unit for teaching project management tools aligned with PMBOK, Proceedings of IEEE 29th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (2016) 46-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2016.10

R. V. Anand, M. Dinakaran, Popular agile methods in software development: Review and analysis, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 11(5) (2016) 3433-3437.

R. da Camara, M. Marinho, S. Sampaio, S. Cadete, How do Agile Software Startups deal with uncertainties by Covid-19 pandemic?, International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications 11(4) (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2020.11402

Heurystyki Jacoba Nielsena, https://primeo.pl/pl/462/Audyty-uzytecznosci-Wedrowka-poznawcza-i-10-heurystyk-Nielsena-, [15.05.2022].

M. Miłosz, Ergonomia systemów informatycznych, Wydawnictwo Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin, 2014.

Wędrówka poznawcza, https://www.k2.pl/blog/wedrowka-poznawcza-10-heurystyk-nielsena-i-analiza-zachowan-uzytkownikow-czyli-o-audycie-ux, [20.05.2022].

N. Alomar, N. Almobarak, S. Alkoblan, S. Alhozaimy, S. Alharbi, Usability engineering of agile software project management tools, Proceedings of International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (2016) 197-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_20

M. Laskowski, Propozycje metodyk badania użyteczności interfejsów aplikacji, Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska (4b) (2012) 21-24.

L. O. Bligård, A. L. Osvalder, Enhanced cognitive walkthrough: Development of the cognitive walkthrough method to better predict, identify, and present usability problems, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 4 (2013) 9-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/931698

M. Weninger, P. Grünbacher, E. Gander, A. Schörgenhumer, Evaluating an Interactive Memory Analysis Tool: Findings from a Cognitive Walkthrough and a User Study, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (EICS) 4 (2020) 1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3394977

M. Miłosz, M. Plechawska-Wójcik, M. Borys, M. Laskowski, Quality improvement of ERP system GUI using expert method: A case study. 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (2013) 145-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2013.6577815

Pawłowski, P., & Plechawska-Wójcik, M. (2022). A comparative analysis of tools dedicated to project management. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 24, 258–264. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3001

A comparative analysis of tools dedicated to project management

Issue Vol. 24 (2022)

Archives

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

License

Article Sidebar

Issue Vol. 24 (2022)

Archives

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

License