A comparative analysis of tools dedicated to project management

Piotr Pawłowski

piotr.pawlowski@pollub.edu.pl
Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology (Poland)

Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik


Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology (Poland)

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of selected tools dedicated to project management: Asana, Trello, Wrike, Monday.com and Bitrix24. The aim of the work is to answer the research question: which project management tool is the most appropriate for members of development teams using classic and agile methodologies. Popular methods for analyzing the quality of interfaces have been reviewed. The research was carried out using the survey method conducted among users using project management tools and cognitive walkthrough - a method used to assess the usability of application and website interfaces.


Keywords:

project management; interface usability analysis; cognitive walkthrough; LUT’s list

T. L. Fox, J. W. Spence, Tools of the trade: A survey of project management tools, Project Management Journal 29(3) (1998) 20-27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289802900305   Google Scholar

P. Patanakul, B. Iewwongcharoen, D. Milosevic, An empirical study on the use of project management tools and techniques across project life-cycle and their impact on project success, Journal of General management 35(3) (2010) 41-66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030630701003500304   Google Scholar

A. Mishra, D. Mishra, Software project management tools: a brief comparative view, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 38(3) (2013) 1-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2464526.2464537   Google Scholar

D. Özkan, A. Mishra, Agile Project Management Tools: A Brief Comprative View, Cybernetics and Information Technologies 19(4) (2019) 17-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2019-0033   Google Scholar

Metoda PMBOK, https://inzynieria.com/budownictwo/wiadomosci/55874,metoda-zarzadzania-pmbok-dlaczego-warto-ja-wdrozyc-w-kazdej-firmie, [03.05.2022].
  Google Scholar

R. Q. Gonçalves, C. G. Von Wangenheim, An instructional unit for teaching project management tools aligned with PMBOK, Proceedings of IEEE 29th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (2016) 46-55.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2016.10   Google Scholar

R. V. Anand, M. Dinakaran, Popular agile methods in software development: Review and analysis, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 11(5) (2016) 3433-3437.
  Google Scholar

R. da Camara, M. Marinho, S. Sampaio, S. Cadete, How do Agile Software Startups deal with uncertainties by Covid-19 pandemic?, International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications 11(4) (2020).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2020.11402   Google Scholar

Heurystyki Jacoba Nielsena, https://primeo.pl/pl/462/Audyty-uzytecznosci-Wedrowka-poznawcza-i-10-heurystyk-Nielsena-, [15.05.2022].
  Google Scholar

M. Miłosz, Ergonomia systemów informatycznych, Wydawnictwo Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin, 2014.
  Google Scholar

Wędrówka poznawcza, https://www.k2.pl/blog/wedrowka-poznawcza-10-heurystyk-nielsena-i-analiza-zachowan-uzytkownikow-czyli-o-audycie-ux, [20.05.2022].
  Google Scholar

N. Alomar, N. Almobarak, S. Alkoblan, S. Alhozaimy, S. Alharbi, Usability engineering of agile software project management tools, Proceedings of International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (2016) 197-208.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_20   Google Scholar

M. Laskowski, Propozycje metodyk badania użyteczności interfejsów aplikacji, Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska (4b) (2012) 21-24.
  Google Scholar

L. O. Bligård, A. L. Osvalder, Enhanced cognitive walkthrough: Development of the cognitive walkthrough method to better predict, identify, and present usability problems, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 4 (2013) 9-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/931698   Google Scholar

M. Weninger, P. Grünbacher, E. Gander, A. Schörgenhumer, Evaluating an Interactive Memory Analysis Tool: Findings from a Cognitive Walkthrough and a User Study, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (EICS) 4 (2020) 1-37.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3394977   Google Scholar

M. Miłosz, M. Plechawska-Wójcik, M. Borys, M. Laskowski, Quality improvement of ERP system GUI using expert method: A case study. 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (2013) 145-152.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2013.6577815   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2022-09-30

Cited by

Pawłowski, P., & Plechawska-Wójcik, M. (2022). A comparative analysis of tools dedicated to project management. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 24, 258–264. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3001

Authors

Piotr Pawłowski 
piotr.pawlowski@pollub.edu.pl
Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology Poland

Authors

Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik 

Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 1053
PDF downloads: 835