Comparison of EXT4 and NTFS filesystem performance

Porównanie wydajności systemu plików EXT4 i NTFS

Abstract

The aim of this article is to compare the two most popular and competing file systems – EXT4 and NTFS in Ubutnu with the use of SSD disk.. At the beginning of this article, a critical description of the literature was made, explaining the purposefulness of the research undertaken. Additionally, the basics of the operation of both discussed file systems are explained. The research consisted of copying files between two partitions and measuring the time of this operation using a specially developed system shell script in the bash language. The conducted research has shown that the EXT4 system is more effective than the NTFS system.


Keywords:

EXT4; NTFS; performance file system; file system

B. Kossak, M. Pańczyk, Porównanie możliwości i cech współczesnych Linuxowych systemów plików: ext4, XFS, Btrfs, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute 4 (2017) 131-136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.610   Google Scholar

V. Dhjaku, N. Xoxa, A. Bame, I. Tafa, Comparing NTFS File System with ETX4 File System, In RTA-CSIT (2018) 176-180.
  Google Scholar

E. Nemeth, G. Snyder, T. R. Hein, B. Whaley, D. Mackin, UNIX and Linux System Administration Handbook (5th Edition), Pearson Education, 2018.
  Google Scholar

Dokumentacja NTFS napisana przez Richarda Russona i Yuvala Fledela, https://dubeyko.com/development/FileSystems/NTFS/ntfsdoc.pdf, [11.06.20222].
  Google Scholar

Strona internetowa poświęcona wykładom z przedmiotu Systemy Operacyjne, https://students.mimuw.edu.pl/SO/Projekt02-03/temat2-g1/ntfs.htm, [11.06.2022].
  Google Scholar

Strona internetowa poświęcona systemowi Ext4, https://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page,
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2022-12-30

Cited by

Sterniczuk, B. (2022). Comparison of EXT4 and NTFS filesystem performance: Porównanie wydajności systemu plików EXT4 i NTFS. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 25, 297–300. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3004

Statistics

Abstract views: 696
PDF downloads: 615