User experience analysis while visiting selected virtual museums
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 25 (2022)
-
Comparison of hybrid and native iOS mobile application development technologies
Michał Kocki, Michał Urban, Piotr Kopniak280-287
-
Comparative analysis of web application interfaces with buttons in graphical and text form for universal design
Jakub Kaliszuk, Adriana Osmulska, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik, Mariusz Dzieńkowski288-296
-
Comparison of EXT4 and NTFS filesystem performance
Porównanie wydajności systemu plików EXT4 i NTFSBartosz Sterniczuk297-300 -
Usability analysis of the user interface of movie-related websites in terms of universal design
Karol Bielec, Jakub Sokół, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska301-308
-
Evaluation of Flutter framework time efficiency in context of user interface tasks
Damian Białkowski, Jakub Smołka309-314
-
Analysis of the graphical user interface of the online store, taking into account the methods of universal design
Cezary Altmajer, Piotr Błażewicz, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska315-322
-
Perfomance analysis of libraries for testing web applications on the ASP.NET Core platform
Karol Niedziela, Jakub Nieradko323-329
-
Analysis of the ergonomics of e-commerce websites
Jarosław Chmal, Monika Ptasińska, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska330-336
-
Improving the interface of an e-commerce website by applying universal design principles
Mateusz Krzysztof Polewski, Albert Rachwał, Mariusz Dzieńkowski, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik337-344
-
Comparative of React and Svelte programming frameworks for creating SPA web applications
Sebastian Dubaj, Beata Pańczyk345-349
-
Application of universal design principles in the creation of websites oriented toward visually impaired persons
Paweł Sławomir Galiński, Mateusz Klimkowicz, Mariusz Dzieńkowski350-357
-
Comparative analysis of the performance of the Flax engine and Unity
Wojciech Szelug358-361
-
Comparison of the cross-platform mobile applications performance in 2D graphics processing
Adam Drzewiecki362-365
-
A comparative analysis of performance of Flutter and Xamarin development frameworks
Mateusz Uciński, Mariusz Dzieńkowski366-370
-
Interface usability analysis of selected streaming services in Poland
Mateusz Niemczuk, Paweł Nankiewicz, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik371-378
-
Comparative analysis of Web application development on Java and PHP
Kacper Truszkowski, Maciej Pańczyk379-383
-
User experience analysis while visiting selected virtual museums
Iwona Poleszak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski384-392
-
Analysis of selected features of application based on monolithic and microservice architecture
Kamil Jaskot, Sławomir Przyłucki393-400
-
Applying universal design principles to improve the websites of a selected university
Tomasz Kamiński, Paweł Kapica, Mariusz Dzieńkowski401-408
-
Swift performance statistical aplications
Sylwester Tylec, Karol Woś409-414
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The paper concerns the study of User Experience by focusing on the usability and user satisfaction aspects. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the usability of two selected virtual museums conducted with 3 research methods: using an oculograph, a System Usability Scale (SUS) usability survey and Nielsen heuristic. The examination was conducted on the following museums that offer virtual tours: Muzeum Instrumentów Muzycznych in Poznan and Muzeum Zamojskie in Zamosc. The participants of the eye tracking experiment and the SUS survey were 22 students of Computer Science at the Politechnika Lubelska, while the Nielsen heuristics analysis was performed by 3 graduate students with relevant qualifications. The obtained eye tracking data, the results of the SUS questionnaires and the evaluation of the Nielsen heuristics were analyzed quantitatively. In addition, a qualitative analysis of eye tracking results was conducted, which provided heat maps and scanning paths. As a result, it was revealed that in the oculography method, the analyzed websites obtained comparable results. However, in the test performed with the SUS usability survey Muzeum Instrumentów Muzycznych achieved a better result. The expert team reviewing Nielsen heuristics also ranked the museum higher.
Keywords:
References
M. Miłosz, Ergonomia systemów informatycznych, Politechnika Lubelska, 2014.
J. Nielsen, 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/, [13.09.2022].
K. Kałan, D. Karpiuk, M. Dzieńkowski, Usability analysis taking into consideration the aspects of accessibility of selected university websites, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 21 (2021) 295-302, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2725, [01.09.2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2725
S Krug, Nie każ mi myśleć! O życiowym podejściu do funkcjonalności stron internetowych. Wydanie III, Helion, Gliwice, 2014.
I. Mościkowska, B. Rogoś-Turek, Badania jako podstawa projektowania user experience, PWN, Warszawa, 2020.
D. Walsh, M. M. Hall, P. Clough, J. Foster, Characterising online museum users: a study of the National Museums Liverpool Museum website, International Journal on Digital Libraries, 21(2) (2020) 75-87, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-018-0248-8, [15.08.2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-018-0248-8
T. Tullis, Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, USA, 2008.
L. Fauvelle, Reinventing the museum experience with eye-tracking, https://www.intotheminds.com/blog/en/reinventing-museum-experience-eye-tracking/ ,[01.08.2022].
M. Rainoldi, M. Jooss, Eye tracking in tourism, Springer, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49709-5
Tobii Pro TX300, https://www.tobiipro.com/product-listing/tobii-pro-tx300/, [15.08.2022].
Article Details
Abstract views: 393
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
