Comparative analysis of social media accessibility

M. Miłosz, Ergonomia systemów informatycznych, Biblioteka Cyfrowa Politechniki Lubelskiej, 2014.
  Google Scholar

W3C Recommendation, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, 11 December, http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/, [20.07.2022].
  Google Scholar

Web Accessibility Initiative, Web Accessibility Laws & Policies, https://www.w3.org/WAI/policies/, [20.07.2022].
  Google Scholar

A.M. Kaplan, M. Haenlein, Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media, Business Horizons, 53(1) (2010) 59-68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003   Google Scholar

M.G. Dinis, C. Eusébio, and Z. Breda, "Assessing social media accessibility: the case of the Rock in Rio Lisboa music festival", International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 11(1) (2020) 26-46, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-02-2019-0012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-02-2019-0012   Google Scholar

W. Arasid, A.G. Abdullah, D. Wahyudin, C.U. Abdullah, I. Widiaty, D. Zakaria, N. Amelia, A Juhana. An Analysis of Website Accessibility in Higher Education in Indonesia Based on WCAG 2.0 Guidelines, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 306(1) (2018) 012130, https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012130.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012130   Google Scholar

M. Vigo, J. Brown, V. Conway. Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests. In Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1 (2013) 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1145/2461121.2461124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2461121.2461124   Google Scholar

S. Schmutz, A. Sonderegger, & J. Sauer. Implementing Recommendations From Web Accessibility Guidelines: Would They Also Provide Benefits to Nondisabled Users. Human Factors, 58(4) (2016) 611–629, https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816640962.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816640962   Google Scholar

K.E. Anderson, Ask me anything: what is Reddit?, Library Hi Tech News, 32(5) (2015) 8-11, https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2015-0018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2015-0018   Google Scholar

L.R. Kasday. A tool to evaluate universal Web accessibility. In Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability (CUU '00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2000) 161–162, https://doi.org/10.1145/355460.355559.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/355460.355559   Google Scholar

K. Holmqvist, M. Nyström, and F. Mulvey. Eye tracker data quality: what it is and how to measure it. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2012) 45–52, https://doi.org/10.1145/2168556.2168563.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2168556.2168563   Google Scholar

L.N. van der Laan, I.T.C. Hooge, D.T.D. de Ridder, M.A. Viergever, P.A.M. Smeets, Do you like what you see? The role of first fixation and total fixation duration in consumer choice, Food Quality and Preference, 39 (2015) 46-55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.015   Google Scholar

O. Špakov and D. Miniotas 2007. Visualization of Eye Gaze Data using Heat Maps. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, 74(2) (2007) 55-58.
  Google Scholar

G.V. Glass. Testing Homogeneity of Variances. American Educational Research Journal, 3(3) (1966) 187–190, https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312003003187.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312003003187   Google Scholar