Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 27 (2023)
-
A comparative analysis of the measurement tools of fuel consumption in a passenger car
Karol Sawczuk, Jakub Grzesiak, Marcin Barszcz100-103
-
Comparative Analysis of Selected Programming Frameworks in terms of their Suitability for User Authentication and Authorization
Przemysław Rodzik104-111
-
Analysis of the Spring Boot and Spring Cloud in developing Java cloud applications
Mateusz Kozak112-120
-
PaaS platform comparison based on users feedback
Mateusz Saputa, Konrad Prządka, Jakub Smołka121-124
-
Comparative analysis of the availability of cinema websites, taking into account the principles of universal design
Hanna Boguta, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska125-131
-
Comparison of shallow and deep learning methods of ECG signals clas-sification for arrhythmia detection
Dodon Turianto Nugrahadi, Rudy Herteno, Dwi Kartini, Muhammad Haekal, Mohammad Reza Faisal132-137
-
Comparative analysis of VPN protocols
Comparative analysis of VPN protocolsJerzy Antoniuk, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik138-144 -
A comparison of word embedding-based extraction feature techniques and deep learning models of natural disaster messages classification
Mohammad Reza Faisal, Irwan Budiman, Friska Abadi, Muhammad Haekal, Dodon Turianto Nugrahadi145-153
-
Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform
Damian Ciechan154-161
-
Influence of video content type on the usefulness of reinforcement learning algorithms in DASH systems
Przemyslaw Markiewicz, Sławomir Przyłucki162-170
-
Comparative analysis of data reading performance from the Salesforce platform using GraphQL, REST and SOAP interfaces
Ryszard Rogalski171-177
-
The analysis of Java ORM frameworks performance in terms of analytical data processing
Justyna Baran, Piotr Muryjas178-185
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Article describes comparative analysis of both code and low-code automation tools together with frameworks used for developing graphical user interfaces that are available on the Salesforce Platform. The research is being carried out due to lack of such comparison in the available literature and due to popularity of the Salesforce CRM. Four automation tools were put together: code-based Apex Triggers and three point-and-click tools: Workflow Rules, Process Builder, Flow Builder. In each of the frameworks (Visualforce, Aura Components, Lightning Web Components) an application module was developed and example logic was implemented in each of the automation tools. DML operations insert, update, delete were compared in terms of performance and each technology was analyzed in terms of provided functionalities and limitations. It was concluded that the most efficient automation tool is Flow Builder and the Lightning Web Components framework is the best choice for developing graphical user interfaces.
Keywords:
References
R. Waszkowski, Low-code platform for automating business processes in manufacturing, IFAC-PapersOnLine 52(10) (2019) 376–381, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.10.060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.10.060
N. Carroll, L. Móráin, D. Garrett, A. Jamnadass, The importance of citizen development for digital transformation, Cutter IT Journal 34(3) (2021) 5–9.
J. Wong, M. Driver, P. Vincent, Low-code development technologies evaluation guide, Gartner, 2019.
Gartner Forecasts Worldwide Low-Code Development Technologies Market to Grow 20% in 2023, https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2022-12-13-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-low-code-development-technologies-market-to-grow-20-percent-in-2023, [06.03.2023].
Salesforce ranked #1 CRM Provider for Ninth Consecutive Year, https://www.salesforce.com/news/stories/salesforce-ranked-1-crm-provider-for-ninth-consecutive-year/, [21.01.2023].
Lightning Web Components, https://lwc.dev/, [07.02.2023].
H. Thanduparakkal, P. Shahad, C. G. Raji, Using Salesforce to Build Real Time Covid 19 Tracker with Cloud Computing Technology, Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing, ICAAIC, Salem, India (2022) 942–948, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAAIC53929.2022.9792802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAAIC53929.2022.9792802
V. Sharma, S. Saraswat, S. Verma, P. Banga, D. Gupta, Cost-Effective Data Mining Application Covid-19 Analyzer, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks, ISCON, Mathura, India (2021) 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCON52037.2021.9702328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCON52037.2021.9702328
A. Poniszewska-Maranda, R. Matusiak, N. Kryvinska, Use of Salesforce platform for building real-time service systems in cloud, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC, Honolulu, HI, USA (2017) 491–494, https://doi.org/10.1109/SCC.2017.72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SCC.2017.72
R. Gupta, S. Verma, K. Janjua, Custom application development in cloud environment: Using salesforce, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computing Sciences, ICCS, Jalandhar, India (2018) 23–27, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCS.2018.00010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCS.2018.00010
D. R. Miącz, Analiza wydajności metod tworzenia aplikacji w technologii Salesforce, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute 10 (2019) 24–27, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.189
W. Marańda, A. Poniszewska-Marańda, M. Szymczyńska, Data Processing in Cloud Computing Model on the Example of Salesforce Cloud, Information 13(2) (2022) 85, https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020085
D. Appleman, R. Watson, The Dark Art Of CPU Benchmarking, https://www.salesforce.com/video/296515/, [16.02.2023].
Article Details
Abstract views: 534
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
