An accessibility analysis of websites of selected types of universities
Maciej Banaszak
maciej.banaszak@pollub.edu.plLublin University of Technology (Poland)
Mariusz Dzieńkowski
Lublin University of Technology
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1932-297X
Abstract
Universities have their websites, web and mobile applications that are aimed at different audiences: candidates students, students, employees and business environment. In the case of public universities this software must be accessible to the widest possible range of users, as well as people with disabilities. The requirements have been imposed on public institutions by current Polish laws. Accordingly, it is necessary to periodically review the compliance with accessibility requirements, and if any requirement is not met by a particular service, the accessibility statement should mention it and state the prospect of remedying it. The aim of the study is to analyze and evaluate the accessibility of websites of various types of selected higher education institutions in Poland, taking into account the type of the university. Accordingly, a study consisting of two stages was performed. The first stage consisted in conducting an expert analysis using a proprietary checklist to verify whether a given site contains selected accessibility features. The second stage consisted in an audit using automated tools that checked various aspects of the application: accessibility (Utilitia, accessiBe), performance (Google PageSpeed Insights) and adaptation to mobile devices (Google Mobile-Friendly Test). Thirty sites were used as research material, each belonging to one of 6 types of higher-education institutions: technical, economic, pedagogical, agricultural/natural science, physical education and a university. The results obtained from the first part of the survey show that university websites are equipped with standard accessibility tools, regardless of which group they belong to - the average accessibility rate for all universities was 63.7%. The second part of the survey showed that the greatest discrepancies between the different types of universities (ranging from 56.4% to 79.6%) occurred in the aspect of website performance. The sites of economic universities performed best in this element (79.6%), while the weakest were those of physical education universities (56.4%).
Keywords:
accessibility, usability, automated accessibility testing tools, checklistReferences
Czym jest dostępność cyfrowa, https://utilitia.pl/czym-jest-dostepnosc-cyfrowa/, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego I Rady (UE) 2016/2102 z dnia 26 października 2016 r. w sprawie dostępności stron internetowych i mobilnych aplikacji organów sektora publicznego (Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej L 327/1,2.12.2016).
Google Scholar
Konieczny Dostępność cyfrowa. Omówienie wymogów dostępności cyfrowej dla podmiotów publicznych, https://www.gov.pl/web/dostepnosc-cyfrowa/omowienie-wymogow-dostepnosci-cyfrowej-dla-podmiotow-publicznych, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
Ustawa z dnia 4 kwietnia 2019 r. o dostępności cyfrowej stron internetowych i aplikacji mobilnych podmiotów publicznych (Dz. U. 2019 poz. 848).
Google Scholar
D. Paszkiewicz, J. Dębski, Dostępność serwisów internetowych. Dobre praktyki w projektowaniu serwisów internetowych dostępnych dla osób z różnymi niepełnosprawnościami, Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciół Integracji, Warszawa, 2013, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284182660_Dostepnosc_serwisow_internetowych.
Google Scholar
Accessibility Evaluator (ACE), https://ace.accessibe.com/, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
W3C, Supported States and Properties, https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro/, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
W. Stasiak, M. Dzieńkowski, Accessibility assessment of selected university websites, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute 19 (2021) 81-88, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2462.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2462
Google Scholar
M. Bednarczyk, M. Dzieńkowski, Evaluation of the availability of websites of communes in the Lubelskie Province, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute 19 (2021) 114-120, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2618.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2618
Google Scholar
S. Rahmatizadeh, S. Valizadeh-Haghi, Monitoring for accessibility in medical university websites: Meeting the needs of people with disabilities, Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 8 (2), (2018) 102-124, http://www.jacces.org/index.php/jacces/article/view/150/201.
Google Scholar
AChecker, Functional Accessibility Evaluator (FAE), https://fae.disability.illinois.edu/anonymous/?Anonymous%20Report=/, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
E. Ostertagová, O. Ostertag, J. Kováč, Methodology and Application of the Kruskal-Wallis Test, Applied Mechanics and Materials 611 (2014) 115-120 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.611.115.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.611.115
Google Scholar
Walidator utilitia, https://validator.utilitia.pl/, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
Google Mobile-Friendly Test, https://search.google.com/test/mobile-friendly, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
Goggle PageSpeed Insights, https://pagespeed.web.dev/?hl=pl, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
accessiBe, https://accessibe.com/accessscan, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
J. Dębski, WCAG 2.1 w skrócie, https://www.gov.pl/web/dostepnosc-cyfrowa/wcag-21-w-skrocie, [11.12.2022].
Google Scholar
Statistics
Abstract views: 113PDF downloads: 190
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
