Analysis of the ergonomics of interfaces of popular e-marketing tools
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 29 (2023)
-
Performance analysis of web applications created in the Spring and Laravel frameworks
Jakub Suchanowski, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik304-311
-
Comparative Analysis of Selected Game Engines
Bartłomiej Szabat, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik312-316
-
Video game performance analysis on selected operating systems
Agata Wrześniewska, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska317-324
-
Analysis of the ergonomics of interfaces of popular e-marketing tools
Weronika Studzińska325-332
-
Research on User Experience during Interactions with Mobile Applications for Diabetics
Przemysław Bajda, Rafał Baliński, Mariusz Dzieńkowski333-340
-
Performance analysis of React v. 18.1.0 and Angular v. 11.0.2 development frameworks
Analiza wydajności szkieletów programistycznych React v. 18.1.0 i Angular v. 11.0.2Albert Poniedziałek, Beata Pańczyk341-345 -
A comparative analysis of the Flutter and React Native frameworks
Mateusz Markowski, Jakub Smołka346-351
-
Performance analysis of REST API technologies using Spring and Express.js examples
Maciej Wicha, Beata Pańczyk352-359
-
A performance analysis of a cloud database on mobile devices
Sylwester Kot, Jakub Smołka360-365
-
Face Recognition using Deep Learning and TensorFlow framework
Makrem Beldi366-373
-
Comparison of tools for creating and conducting automated tests
Grzegorz Wojciech Bielesza, Mariusz Dzieńkowski374-382
-
Comparison of application container orchestration platforms
Adam Pankowski, Paweł Powroźnik383-390
-
A study of the user experience while working with mobile applications cooperating with sports bands
Szymon Czopek, Mariusz Dzieńkowski391-398
-
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms on Classification of Covid-19 Cough Sounds Using MFCC Extraction
Mohammad Reza Faisal, Muhammad Thoriq Hidayat, Dwi Kartini, Fatma Indriani, Irwan Budiman, Triando Hamonangan Saragih399-404
-
Comparative analysis of package managers Flatpak and Snap used for open-source software distribution
Grzegorz Jan Cichocki, Sławomir Wojciech Przyłucki405-412
-
Analysis of the impact of using containerization techniques on application performance in Python
Kacper Chołody, Sławomir Przyłucki413-420
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
weronika.studzinska@pollub.edu.pl
Abstract
This article analyses the ergonomics of the interfaces of selected e-marketing tools. The main aim of the study was to verify whether all the examined tools have a similar user interface quality. The research was conducted using the cogni-tive walkthrough method, a modified LUT list with WUP scores, and a questionnaire for assessing tool usability based on Nielsen heuristics. Three tools designed for Internet monitoring were analysed - Brand24, Mention and Awario. The experiment showed that, in terms of the ergonomics of the solutions, not all tools have a similar interface quality. For two of the analysed tools, similar results and ratings were obtained, while one of them presented a noticeably lower level.
Keywords:
References
C. Giunta, Digital marketing platform tools, generation Z, and cultural considerations, Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness 14(2) (2020) 63 75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/jmdc.v14i2.2834
F. K. Mazumder, U. K. Das, Usability guidelines for usable user interface, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 3(9) (2014) 79 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2014.0309011
K. S. Park, C. H. Lim, A structured methodology for comparative evaluation of user interface designs using usability criteria and measures, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 23(5-6) (1999) 379 389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00059-0
Ł. Kozioł, M. Żabińska, J. Majewski, Dobre praktyki projektowania interfejsu użytkownika, Zeszyt Naukowy Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Bankowości w Krakowie 57 (2020) 1 14.
H. Taiminen, One gets what one orders: Utilisation of digital marketing tools, The Marketing Review 16(4) (2016) 389 404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1362/146934716X14636478977999
P. Ganev, How to Choose the Appropriate Digital Marketing Tool, Global Business & Economics Anthology 1(3) (2018) 16 25.
N. A. Zaini, S. F. M. Noor, T. S. M. T. Wook, Evaluation of api interface design by applying cognitive walkthrough, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 10(2) (2019) 306 315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100241
M. Jusiak, M. Miłosz, Analiza jakości interfejsu aplikacji internetowej z wykorzystaniem eye-trackingu – studium przypadku, Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 10 (2019) 62 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.207
A. Miklosik, M. Kuchta, N. Evans, S. Zak, Towards the adoption of machine learning-based analytical tools in digital marketing, IEEE 7 (2019) 85705 85718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924425
M. Borys, M. Plechawska-Wójcik, Badanie użyteczności oraz dostępności interfejsu w aplikacjach mobilnych, Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy 35 (2013) 63 78.
M. Kurzyna, D. Matysiak, Analiza porównawcza jakości interfejsów mobilnego dostępu do usług wybranych banków, Praca magisterska, Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin, 2017.
M. Cioczek, T. Czarnota, Analiza współczesnych interfejsów człowiek-komputer, Praca magisterska, Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin, 2021.
M. Farzandipour, E. Nabovati, H. Tadayon, M. S. Jabali, Usability evaluation of a nursing information system by applying cognitive walkthrough method, International Journal of Medical Informatics 152 (2021) 1 7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104459
M. Miłosz, M. Plechawska-Wójcik, M. Borys, M. Laskowski, Quality improvement of ERP system GUI using expert method: A case study, 2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), IEEE (2013) 145 152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2013.6577815
P. Pawłowski, Analiza porównawcza narzędzi dedykowanych zarządzaniu projektami, Praca magisterska, Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin, 2022.
M. Kuhar, T. Merčun, Exploring user experience in digital libraries through questionnaire and eye-tracking data, Library & Information Science Research 44(3) (2022) 1 11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101175
M. Borys, M. Miłosz, Mobile application usability testing in quasi-real conditions-the synergy of using different methods, 2018 11th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI), IEEE (2018) 362 368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2018.8431342
K. Harezlak, J. Rzeszutek, P. Kasprowski, The eye tracking methods in user interfaces assessment, International Conference on Intelligent Decision Technologies, Springer (2015) 325 335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19857-6_29
A. Prahara, T. S. Saputro, Keystroke-level model to evaluate chatbot interface for reservation system, 2019 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI), IEEE (2019) 241 246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/eecsi.v6.1966
R. Khajouei, M. Zahiri Esfahani, Y. Jahani, Comparison of heuristic and cognitive walkthrough usability evaluation methods for evaluating health information systems, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 24 (2017) 55 60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw100
Brand24 – narzędzie do monitoringu Internetu i analizy danych, https://brand24.pl/, [20.03.2023].
Mention – narzędzie do monitoringu Internetu i analizy danych, https://mention.com/en/, [20.03.2023].
Awario – narzędzie do monitoringu Internetu i analizy danych, https://awario.com/, [20.03.2023].
Mousotron – narzędzie do kontroli myszy i klawiatury, https://www.blacksunsoftware.com/mousotron.html, [21.03.2023].
Article Details
Abstract views: 269
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
