Comparative Analysis of High Availability Solutions
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Published:
Sep 30, 2019
Issue Vol. 12 (2019)
Articles
-
Hybrid methods of working with databases in JEE applications
Katarzyna Jóźwicka, Mariusz Mitrus167-171
-
Tools to support user interface design web applications - comparative analysis
Paweł Serafin, Marek Miłosz172-178
-
Analysis of possibility of virtual reality usage for investigating reaction on given conditions
Marcin Łukasiak, Kamil Machul, Mateusz Maj179-186
-
The analysis of the influence of a graphical user interface's design on the number and time of website visits
Izabela Wasyluk, Grzegorz Kozieł187-192
-
Storage efficiency comparison of UML models in selected database technologies
Andrii Filatov, Paweł Flis, Beata Pańczyk193-198
-
Methods for recognizing mushroom species on the basis of the photo
Kamil Chodoła, Grzegorz Czyż, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska199-205
-
Methods of enhancing the performance and security of web applications
Tomasz Machulski, Grzegorz Nowakowski, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska206-213
-
Comparison of virtualization performance of Proxmox, OpenVZ, OpenNebula, Vmware ESX and Xen Server
Grzegorz Rycaj214-219
-
Analysis of the impact of technologies and methods of hologram transmission on the parameters and effects of transmission
Krzysztof Mazur, Damian Mazur220-225
-
Analysis of the possibility of shortening the time of creating a mobile application for Android and iOS systems using Xamarin technology
Daniel Molenda, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska226-231
-
Own system of intelligent building in comparison with an open - source solution
Cezary Kryczka232-239
-
Comparative Analysis of High Availability Solutions
Michał Sylwester Borsewicz, Daniel Bieniek240-245
-
Analysis of the development Android’s runtime
Kostiantyn Honcharenko, Jakub Smołka246-251
-
Analysis and evaluation of tools supporting group work in the cloud
Paweł Gustaw, Elżbieta Miłosz252-257
-
Analysis of the application possibilities of IoT technology in smart home systems
Arkadiusz Bęben, Piotr Kopniak258-266
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Michał Sylwester Borsewicz
Lublin University of Technology, Poland
Daniel Bieniek
Lublin University of Technology, Poland
Abstract
The aim of the thesis was to perform a comparative analysis of selected high availability solutions. The issue of choosing the right HA solutions is an indispensable part of any company that uses IT infrastructure. As the most commonly used solutions are the virtualization solutions of Microsoft: Hyper-V and VMWare: vSphere, they have been subjected to in-depth analysis. For this purpose, we have performed performance tests of guest systems on the above hypervisors and we tested the behavior of the cluster in the event of failure of one of the hosts.
Keywords:
cluster; high availability; Hyper-V; vSphere
References
[1] Gray J., Siewiorek D.: High-Availability Computer Systems. Carnegie Mellon University, 1991.
[2] Kopper K.: The Linux Enterprise Cluster - Build a Highly Available Cluster with Commodity Hardware and Free Software. No Starch Press, 2005.
[3] Prashanta K. D.: Comparative Study on XEN, KVM, VSphere, and Hyper-V. [W]: Emerging Research Surrounding Power Consumption and Performance Issues in Utility Computing, 2016.
[4] Alroobaea R., Ghiduk A., Ikbal M.: Performance Evaluation of Xen, KVM, and Proxmox Hypervisors. [W]: International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes. 9(2), 2018.
[5] Graniszewski W, Arciszewski A.: Performance analysis of selected hypervisors (Virtual Machine Monitors – VMMs). [W]: International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, 62(3), 2016.
[6] Bhatia A., Bhattal G.: A comparative study of Various Hypervisors Performance. [W]: International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. Tom 7, zeszyt 12, 2016.
[7] Fayyad-Kazan H., Perneel L., Timmerman M.: Banchmark the Performance of Microsoft Hyper-V server, VMware ESXi and Xen Hypervisors. [W]: Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2013.
[8] https://www.microsoft.com/enus/download/details.aspx?id=56495 [01.06.2019].
[9] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-onwindows/reference/hyper-v-architecture [01.06.2019].
[10] https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2018/04/introducingvmware-vsphere-6-7.html [01.06.2019].
[2] Kopper K.: The Linux Enterprise Cluster - Build a Highly Available Cluster with Commodity Hardware and Free Software. No Starch Press, 2005.
[3] Prashanta K. D.: Comparative Study on XEN, KVM, VSphere, and Hyper-V. [W]: Emerging Research Surrounding Power Consumption and Performance Issues in Utility Computing, 2016.
[4] Alroobaea R., Ghiduk A., Ikbal M.: Performance Evaluation of Xen, KVM, and Proxmox Hypervisors. [W]: International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes. 9(2), 2018.
[5] Graniszewski W, Arciszewski A.: Performance analysis of selected hypervisors (Virtual Machine Monitors – VMMs). [W]: International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, 62(3), 2016.
[6] Bhatia A., Bhattal G.: A comparative study of Various Hypervisors Performance. [W]: International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. Tom 7, zeszyt 12, 2016.
[7] Fayyad-Kazan H., Perneel L., Timmerman M.: Banchmark the Performance of Microsoft Hyper-V server, VMware ESXi and Xen Hypervisors. [W]: Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2013.
[8] https://www.microsoft.com/enus/download/details.aspx?id=56495 [01.06.2019].
[9] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-onwindows/reference/hyper-v-architecture [01.06.2019].
[10] https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2018/04/introducingvmware-vsphere-6-7.html [01.06.2019].
Article Details
Abstract views: 478
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
