Comparison of fixation and saccades identification algorithms in the eye tracking recordings for medical diagnosis

Marcin Ignatiuk

general.91@o2.pl
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)

Przemysław Antoni Pasieczny


Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)

Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik


Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)

Magdalena Borys


Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)

Abstract

The article presents a comparative analysis of selected algorithms for eye movements identification. The analysis is based on a comparison of the classification of fixation and saccades using I-VT and I-DT algorithms. For the algorithms comparison the application that implementing the identification of eye tracking data has been developed. The results of the analysis are presented in the form of graphs.


Keywords:

Eye Tracking; I-VT; I-DT

[1] Krauzlis R.J. Eye movements. W: Squire L.R. (red.), „Fundamental neuroscience”, Wyd. 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam 2008.
[2] K. Jadanowski, Sławomir Budrewicz, Ewa Koziorowska -Gawron, „Zaburzenia gałkoruchowe w chorobach ośrodkowego układu nerwowego”, Polski Przegląd Neurologiczny 2010.
[3] User Manual — Tobii Studio Version 3.3.0 12/2014 Tobii Technology AB
[4] Peter R Jones, „A computational reassessment of noise in eyetracking data: Modelling phenomena and ephemer”.
[5] Salvucci D.D., Goldberg J.H., „Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications”, ACM 2000.
[6] Susan M.Munn Leanne Stefano Jeff B.Pelz, „Fixation - identification in dynamic scenes: comparing an automated algorithm to manual coding”.
[7] Larsson L., Nystrom M., Stridh M., „Detection of saccades and postsaccadic oscillations in the presence of smooth pursuit”, 2013.
[8] Lopez, J. S. A., „Off-the-shelf Gaze Interaction”, 2009.
[9] Van Rensbergen J., & De Troy A., „A reference guide for the Leuven dual-PC controlled Purkinje eyetracking system", Leuven, Belgium, 2015.
[10] http://eyetracking.pl/ [11.2016]
Download


Published
2017-09-30

Cited by

Ignatiuk, M., Pasieczny, . P. A., Plechawska-Wójcik, M., & Borys, M. (2017). Comparison of fixation and saccades identification algorithms in the eye tracking recordings for medical diagnosis. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 4, 99–103. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.603

Authors

Marcin Ignatiuk 
general.91@o2.pl
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland

Authors

Przemysław Antoni Pasieczny 

Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland

Authors

Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik 

Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland

Authors

Magdalena Borys 

Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 265
PDF downloads: 279