Efficiency comparison of mobile application frameworks for programming using internet technologies
Marcin Martyna
marcin.martyna850@gmail.comInstitute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)
Jakub Smołka
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)
Abstract
Over the last few years many frameworks allowing programming mobile applications have been created. Some of them are based on programming languages typical for internet application programming - HTML or JavaScript for example. This paper presents a comparison of three cross-platform environments: PhoneGap, NativeScript and Appcelerator. Using each of these environments an application with identical functionalities was created. The application was designed for Android operating system. Implemented tests allowed for determining which one of the application framework is the most efficient with respect to the time needed for executing respective functions. Obtained results are shown and analyzed.
Keywords:
framework comparison; Android; mobile application; application testingReferences
[2] Number of smartphone users worldwide from 2014 to 2020 (in billions, https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-ofsmartphone-users-worldwide/ [26.05.2017]
[3] Sarah Allen, Vidal Graupera, Lee Lundrigan: PhoneGap
[4] S. Hanschke, H. Heitkötter, T. A. Majchrzak: Evaluating CrossPlatform Development Approaches for Mobile Applications.
[5] S. Allen, V. Graupera, L. Lundrigan: Titanium Mobile.
[6] Wenliang Du, Xing Jin, Tongbo Luo, Lusha Wang: FineGrained Access Control for HTML5-Based Mobile Applications in Android.
[7] Euler Horta Marinho, Rodolfo Ferreira Resende: Native and Multiple Targeted Mobile Applications.
[8] Antonio Cicchetti, Manuel Palmieri, Inderjeet Singh: Comparison of cross-platform mobile development tools.
[9] B. Dookheea, V. Hurbungs, Y. K. Suttroogun: A Framework to Reduce the Testing Time of a Mobile Application Using an Automation Tool.
[10] Marcelo Medeiros Eler, Andre Takeshi Endo, Davi Bernardo Silva,: An analysis of automated tests for mobile Android applications.
[11] Henning Heitkötter ,Tim A. Majchrzak, Benjamin Ruland, Till Weber: Comparison of Mobile Web Frameworks.
[12] 7 Best Java Frameworks for 2016 https://www.romexsoft.com/blog/7-best-java-frameworks-for2016/ [01.06.2017]
[13] 5 Best JavaScript Frameworks in 2017 https://hackernoon.com/5-best-javascript-frameworks-in-2017-7a63b3870282.
[14] A complete history of Android http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-andcommunications/mobile-phones/a-complete-history-of-android470327/3 [01.06.2017]
[15] Mobile operating systems' market share worldwide from January 2012 to December 2016 https://www.statista.com/statistics/272698/global-market-shareheld-by-mobile-operating-systems-since-2009/ [01.06.2017]
[16] Aplikacja mobilna – Hybryda czy Natywna? Różnice https://www.gmi.pl/blog/aplikacja-mobilna-hybryda-natywna/
[17] Strona producenta TypeScript https://www.typescriptlang.org/ [14.08.2017]
[18] Rapid mobile app development (RMAD) http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/rapid-mobile-appdevelopment-RMADrapid [02.06.2017]
[19] PhoneGap, Cordova, and what’s in a name? http://phonegap.com/blog/2012/03/19/phonegap-cordova-andwhate28099s-in-a-name/ [02.06.2017]
[20] Asus ZenFone ZE551ML https://www.asus.com/pl/Phone/ZenFone_2_ZE551ML/ [03.06.2017]
[21] Strona producenta Appcelerator zakładka cnnik https://www.appcelerator.com/pricing/ [6.09.2017]
[22] Bartłomiej Matacz: Efficiency Analysis of Mobile Application Frameworks
Authors
Marcin Martynamarcin.martyna850@gmail.com
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland
Authors
Jakub SmołkaInstitute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 260PDF downloads: 118
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.