Comparison of object-relational data mapping technology in Symfony 3 framework
Karol Sawłuk
karol.sawluk@gmail.comInstitute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)
Marek Miłosz
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)
Abstract
The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of object-relation mapping technologies in the framework Symfony 3: Doctrine and Propel. The analysis was performed in terms of script execution speed and memory usage during database operations. The analysis allowed to identify the technology with faster and more efficient algorithms. Doctrine is up to three times faster than Propel.
Keywords:
ORM; php; symfony 3; DBMS; doctrine; propeReferences
[1] Matt Zandstra: PHP Objects, Patterns and Practice, 5th Edition, 2016.
[2] Chris Pitt: Pro PHP MVC, 2012
[3] O’Reilly Media: Learning PHP Design Patterns, 2013
[4] Kevin Dunglas: Persistance in PHP with Doctrine ORM, 2013
[5] http://docs.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrineorm/en/latest/reference/association-mapping.html [18.08.2017]
[6] Jason E. Sweat: PHP Architect’s Guide to PHP Design Patterns, 2005
[7] Martin Fowler: Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture, 2002
[8] http://docs.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrineorm/en/latest/reference/working-with-objects.html [3.12.2017]
[9] http://www.vertabelo.com/blog/technical-articles/side-by-sidedoctrine2-and-propel-2-comparison [20.09.2017]
[10] https://blog.appdynamics.com/engineering/top-6-databaseperformance-metrics-to-monitor-in-enterprise-applications/ [4.12.2017]
[11] http://docs.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrineorm/en/latest/reference/architecture.html [4.12.2017]
[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propel_(PHP) [4.12.2017]
[13] O’Reilly Media: High Performance MySQL, 3rd Edition, 2012
[2] Chris Pitt: Pro PHP MVC, 2012
[3] O’Reilly Media: Learning PHP Design Patterns, 2013
[4] Kevin Dunglas: Persistance in PHP with Doctrine ORM, 2013
[5] http://docs.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrineorm/en/latest/reference/association-mapping.html [18.08.2017]
[6] Jason E. Sweat: PHP Architect’s Guide to PHP Design Patterns, 2005
[7] Martin Fowler: Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture, 2002
[8] http://docs.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrineorm/en/latest/reference/working-with-objects.html [3.12.2017]
[9] http://www.vertabelo.com/blog/technical-articles/side-by-sidedoctrine2-and-propel-2-comparison [20.09.2017]
[10] https://blog.appdynamics.com/engineering/top-6-databaseperformance-metrics-to-monitor-in-enterprise-applications/ [4.12.2017]
[11] http://docs.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrineorm/en/latest/reference/architecture.html [4.12.2017]
[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propel_(PHP) [4.12.2017]
[13] O’Reilly Media: High Performance MySQL, 3rd Edition, 2012
Sawłuk, K., & Miłosz, M. (2018). Comparison of object-relational data mapping technology in Symfony 3 framework . Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 8, 235–240. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.687
Authors
Karol Sawłukkarol.sawluk@gmail.com
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland
Authors
Marek MiłoszInstitute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 262PDF downloads: 50
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
