Time analysis of the performance of Windows 10 and Windows 8.1 based on mobile application
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Published:
Nov 30, 2018
Issue Vol. 8 (2018)
Articles
-
Object recognition on video from camera to computer
Oleksandr Cherednyk, Elżbieta Miłosz215-219
-
System and hardware security options available for users on devices running Android operating system
Tomasz Borysiewicz220-225
-
Efficiency of creating application’s presentation layer with frameworks AngularJS, Angular2, BackboneJS
Monika Tobiańska, Jakub Smołka226-229
-
User monitoring system using of social networks - structure and analysis of the opportunities
Sofiia Lahoda, Marek Miłosz230-234
-
Comparison of object-relational data mapping technology in Symfony 3 framework
Karol Sawłuk, Marek Miłosz235-240
-
Time analysis of the performance of Windows 10 and Windows 8.1 based on mobile application
Jacek Chmiel, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska241-246
-
Comparison of selected network communication methods on the Android platform
Przemysław Żydek, Jakub Smołka247-251
-
Comparison of tools for automated tests of the graphical user interface using the the Sikuli and AutoIT example
Tomasz Paczuski, Beata Pańczyk252-257
-
Hosting models comparison of ASP.NET Core application
Kamil Zdanikowski, Beata Pańczyk258-262
-
Performance analysis of relational databases Oracle and MS SQL based on desktop application
Grzegorz Dziewit, Jakub Korczyński, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska263-269
-
Verification methods of a programmer’s knowledge and skills
Paweł Hajduk, Norbert Wieruszewski, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska270-276
-
Possibility analysis of environmental threat monitoring with the Arduino platform
Krzysztof Lenart, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik277-281
-
Comparative analysis of mobile applications for IT project management
Ewelina Wlaszczyk, Elżbieta Miłosz282-285
-
Comparing the performance of integration platforms
Bartłomiej Karol Flis, Łukasz Kołyga, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska286-291
-
Analysis of properties of reversible steganography methods
Piotr Zimnicki, Grzegorz Kozieł292-297
-
Performance comparison of automatic tests written in Selenium WebDriver and HP UFT
Krzysztof Drążek, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska298-301
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Jacek Chmiel
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland, Poland
Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland, Poland
Abstract
This article presents time analysis of performance of Windows 10 and Windows 8.1. Presented research was mainly focused on performance comparison of mobile device system elements which are relevant from end user point of view like main processor, RAM and mass storage throughput, image generation speed by the graphics processor and access time to devices. In order to measure the performance of the above elements a mobile benchmark application was created. The hypotheses set in the article have been verified and partially confirmed.
Keywords:
performance; time analysis; mobile systems; Windows 10; Windows 8.1
References
[1] Lilja D.J.: Measurning Computer Performance: A Practitioner's guide, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[2] Allen A.O.: Computer Performance Analysis with Mathematica. Academic Press, 1994.
[3] Jain R.K.: Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis Techniques For Experimental Design Measurements Simulation And Modeling. Wiley, 1991.
[4] Hoare C.A.R.: Monitors: An Operating System Structuring Concept. Communication of the ACM, 10 (1974), 549-557.
[5] Sung Y., Chang K., Liu T.: The effects of integrating mobile device with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis and research synthesis, Computer & Education, 3 (2016), 252–275.
[6] Shahabi S., Ghazvini M., Bakhtiarian M.: A modified algorithm to improve security and performance of AODV protocol against black hole attack. Springer Wireless Network, 5 (2015), 1505-1511.
[7] V. D. Blondel, A. Decuyper, G. Krings.: A survey of results on mobile phone datasets analysis, EPJ Data Science, 1 (2015), 1–55.
[8] Mazomenos E.B., Biswas D., Acharyya A., Chen T., Maharatna K., Rosengarten J., Morgan J., Curzen N.: A LowComplexity ECG Feature Extraction Algorithm for Mobile Healthcare Applications, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2 (2013), 459-469.
[9] Latif M., Lakhrissi Y., Nfaoui E.H., Es-Sbai, N.: Cross platform approach for mobile application development: A survey. IT4OD (2016),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IT4OD.2016.7479278.
[10] Shaikh A.S, Inamdar M.U.: Performance Analysis: Ubuntu Touch v/s Android OS. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, 3 (2014), 1795-1800.
[11] Park S., Park Y., Choi J.: Performance Analysis of Embedded OS in ARM Platform, ICTC 2012
[12] https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapps/2014/09/05/introducing-win2d-gpu-accelerated-2d-graphics-programming-in-thewindows-runtime/#721RzUqREPKGhSRb.97, [27.02.2018]
[2] Allen A.O.: Computer Performance Analysis with Mathematica. Academic Press, 1994.
[3] Jain R.K.: Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis Techniques For Experimental Design Measurements Simulation And Modeling. Wiley, 1991.
[4] Hoare C.A.R.: Monitors: An Operating System Structuring Concept. Communication of the ACM, 10 (1974), 549-557.
[5] Sung Y., Chang K., Liu T.: The effects of integrating mobile device with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis and research synthesis, Computer & Education, 3 (2016), 252–275.
[6] Shahabi S., Ghazvini M., Bakhtiarian M.: A modified algorithm to improve security and performance of AODV protocol against black hole attack. Springer Wireless Network, 5 (2015), 1505-1511.
[7] V. D. Blondel, A. Decuyper, G. Krings.: A survey of results on mobile phone datasets analysis, EPJ Data Science, 1 (2015), 1–55.
[8] Mazomenos E.B., Biswas D., Acharyya A., Chen T., Maharatna K., Rosengarten J., Morgan J., Curzen N.: A LowComplexity ECG Feature Extraction Algorithm for Mobile Healthcare Applications, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2 (2013), 459-469.
[9] Latif M., Lakhrissi Y., Nfaoui E.H., Es-Sbai, N.: Cross platform approach for mobile application development: A survey. IT4OD (2016),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IT4OD.2016.7479278.
[10] Shaikh A.S, Inamdar M.U.: Performance Analysis: Ubuntu Touch v/s Android OS. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, 3 (2014), 1795-1800.
[11] Park S., Park Y., Choi J.: Performance Analysis of Embedded OS in ARM Platform, ICTC 2012
[12] https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapps/2014/09/05/introducing-win2d-gpu-accelerated-2d-graphics-programming-in-thewindows-runtime/#721RzUqREPKGhSRb.97, [27.02.2018]
Article Details
Chmiel, J., & Skublewska-Paszkowska, M. (2018). Time analysis of the performance of Windows 10 and Windows 8.1 based on mobile application. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 8, 241–246. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.689
Abstract views: 369
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
