Verification methods of a programmer’s knowledge and skills
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Published:
Nov 30, 2018
Issue Vol. 8 (2018)
Articles
-
Object recognition on video from camera to computer
Oleksandr Cherednyk, Elżbieta Miłosz215-219
-
System and hardware security options available for users on devices running Android operating system
Tomasz Borysiewicz220-225
-
Efficiency of creating application’s presentation layer with frameworks AngularJS, Angular2, BackboneJS
Monika Tobiańska, Jakub Smołka226-229
-
User monitoring system using of social networks - structure and analysis of the opportunities
Sofiia Lahoda, Marek Miłosz230-234
-
Comparison of object-relational data mapping technology in Symfony 3 framework
Karol Sawłuk, Marek Miłosz235-240
-
Time analysis of the performance of Windows 10 and Windows 8.1 based on mobile application
Jacek Chmiel, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska241-246
-
Comparison of selected network communication methods on the Android platform
Przemysław Żydek, Jakub Smołka247-251
-
Comparison of tools for automated tests of the graphical user interface using the the Sikuli and AutoIT example
Tomasz Paczuski, Beata Pańczyk252-257
-
Hosting models comparison of ASP.NET Core application
Kamil Zdanikowski, Beata Pańczyk258-262
-
Performance analysis of relational databases Oracle and MS SQL based on desktop application
Grzegorz Dziewit, Jakub Korczyński, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska263-269
-
Verification methods of a programmer’s knowledge and skills
Paweł Hajduk, Norbert Wieruszewski, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska270-276
-
Possibility analysis of environmental threat monitoring with the Arduino platform
Krzysztof Lenart, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik277-281
-
Comparative analysis of mobile applications for IT project management
Ewelina Wlaszczyk, Elżbieta Miłosz282-285
-
Comparing the performance of integration platforms
Bartłomiej Karol Flis, Łukasz Kołyga, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska286-291
-
Analysis of properties of reversible steganography methods
Piotr Zimnicki, Grzegorz Kozieł292-297
-
Performance comparison of automatic tests written in Selenium WebDriver and HP UFT
Krzysztof Drążek, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska298-301
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Paweł Hajduk
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland, Poland
Norbert Wieruszewski
norbert.wieruszewski@pollub.edu.pl
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland, Poland
Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland, Poland
Abstract
The article describes currently utilized methods of a programmer’s knowledge verification and skills. The research consisted of creating custom solution which was an application implementing chosen methods and carrying out test with the participation of programmers having various levels of experience, knowledge and skills. Effectiveness of assessment, reliability and verification time were evaluated based on an analysis of the results received from the research
Keywords:
automatic programmers assessment; knowledge verification methods; unit tests; static code analysis
References
[1] Sedlak & Sedlak, „Prognozy wzrostu zatrudnienia i popytu w branĪy IT i telekomunikacji - Rynek Pracy” (2014),
https://rynekpracy.pl/monitory/prognozy-wzrostu-zatrudnieniai-popytu-w-branzy-it-i-telekomunikacji. [23.06.2018]
[2] S. Shahida, R. Rohaida i Z. Z. Kamal, „Improving Automated Programming Assessments: User Experience Evaluation Using FaSt-generator,” w The Third Information Systems International Conference (2015).
[3] K. Cooper i L. Torczon, Engineering a Compiler 2nd Edition, Elsevier, 2011
[4] A. V. Aho, R. Sethi i J. D. Ullman, Kompilatory. Reguły, metody i narzędzia, WNT, 2002
[5] R. Osherove, The art of Unit Testing, Manning Publications, 2013
[6] T. Kaczanowski, Złe testy, dobre testy, 2016.
[7] M. Janicki i K. Strzecha, Zastosowanie statycznej analizy do walidacji kodu języka Java, Wydawnictwa AGH, 2004.
[8] G. A. Campbell, "Cognitive Complexity. A new way of measuring undertandability," SonarSource, (2018), https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf.
[9] Codility, „The Codility Task Library | Codility Help Center” (2018), http://support.codility.com/screening-candidates-withcodecheck/the-codility-task-library [23.06.2018]
[10] M. Jackson, S. Crouch i R. Baxter "Software Evaluation: Criteria-based Assessment" Software Sustainability Institute, 2011
https://rynekpracy.pl/monitory/prognozy-wzrostu-zatrudnieniai-popytu-w-branzy-it-i-telekomunikacji. [23.06.2018]
[2] S. Shahida, R. Rohaida i Z. Z. Kamal, „Improving Automated Programming Assessments: User Experience Evaluation Using FaSt-generator,” w The Third Information Systems International Conference (2015).
[3] K. Cooper i L. Torczon, Engineering a Compiler 2nd Edition, Elsevier, 2011
[4] A. V. Aho, R. Sethi i J. D. Ullman, Kompilatory. Reguły, metody i narzędzia, WNT, 2002
[5] R. Osherove, The art of Unit Testing, Manning Publications, 2013
[6] T. Kaczanowski, Złe testy, dobre testy, 2016.
[7] M. Janicki i K. Strzecha, Zastosowanie statycznej analizy do walidacji kodu języka Java, Wydawnictwa AGH, 2004.
[8] G. A. Campbell, "Cognitive Complexity. A new way of measuring undertandability," SonarSource, (2018), https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf.
[9] Codility, „The Codility Task Library | Codility Help Center” (2018), http://support.codility.com/screening-candidates-withcodecheck/the-codility-task-library [23.06.2018]
[10] M. Jackson, S. Crouch i R. Baxter "Software Evaluation: Criteria-based Assessment" Software Sustainability Institute, 2011
Article Details
Hajduk, P., Wieruszewski, . N., & Skublewska-Paszkowska, M. (2018). Verification methods of a programmer’s knowledge and skills. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 8, 270–276. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.695
Abstract views: 264
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
