Ecological Supply Chain: Tools For Evaluating E-Waste – World Perspective
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023)
-
The Future of Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development Journal
Artur Pawłowski7-12
-
From the Territory of Recovery to Sustainable Development: a Methodological Concept of Effective Socio-economic Development of Ukraine after the War Development
Nataly Martynovych, Iryna Yemchenko, Tetiana Kulinich13-25
-
The Impact of the War in Ukraine on the Food Security of Low-Income Countries
Olena Shevchuk, Olha Ilyash, Serhii Kozlovskyi, Nadiia Roshchyna, Svitlana Hrynkevych, Vira Butenko, Glib Mazhara26-41
-
Is the Current Reality Conducive to the Implementation of Sustainable Development?
Wiesław Sztumski42-48
-
Relationships between Wellbeing and Sustainable Development in a Group of Selected Developed Countries
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser, Rastko Gajanin49-77
-
Comparison of Japan and OECD Countries in Terms of Well-Being Resources
Fatma Ince78-85
-
Towards a Political Economy of Renewable Energy: Does Democracy and Globalization Matter for Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs)
Orhan Cengiz, Müge Manga86-101
-
The Role of Education and Innovation in Renewable Energy Consumption in OECD and BRICS Countries
Junrong Li, Abid Rehman, Jamal Khan102-110
-
Towards Sustainable Development: Revisiting the Middle-Income Trap Hypothesis for the Southern Common Market Countries
Veli Yilanci, Uğur Ursavaş, Tamer Güven111-120
-
Philosophy of Sustainable Development: Understanding the Significance of Gender Equality in Business Organisations
Purnima Lenka121-127
-
Sustainable Livelihoods a Foundation for Rural Development Leads to Sustainability
Abhijeet Kumar, Avinash Kumar, Swati Kumari, Neha Kumari, Sneha Kumari, Puja Mishra128-140
-
Green Marketing: An Ethical and Anti-Environmental Resilient Approach for Sustainable Business
Sachin Chauhan, Naznin Naznin141-147
-
On the Relationship Between ISO Standards and Sustainable Development
Enriko Ceko148-158
-
Effect of Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Performance in Supply Chain Management
Shuang Wang, Guixian Tian, Tahir Islam, Farhan Zeb Khaskhelly, Maria Aijaz Shaikh159-166
-
Ecological Supply Chain: Tools For Evaluating E-Waste – World Perspective
Liao Meihui, Maryam Khokhar, Indrajit Patra167-182
-
Analysis and Audit of Reporting on Sustainable Development for Trade Networks and Directions for Their Improvement
Alla Us, Karina Nazarova183-192
-
Evaluation Model of Environmental Sustainable Competitive Tourism Based on Entropy
Danijela Pantović, Marija Kostić, Sonja Veljović, Milica Luković193-203
-
A Study on the Impact of Reform and Opening-up on Sustainable Development: Evidence from China
Linglin Xiang, Huaixi Zhang, Yiqing Lyu204-2015
-
Supervised Credit, Government Strategies and Green Development: Evidence from China
Bingbing Zhang216-228
-
Logistics of Smart Port in Ukraine: Problems and Prospects in the Conditions of Sustainable Development
Arsen Muradian, Olexiy Kuzkin, Natalia Remzina229-241
-
Investigating the Impact of Education and Women in Agriculture on Human Capital Outcomes in Africa: An Interaction Analysis
Zhichao Yu, Romanus Osabohien242-248
-
Environment, Economy and Society – the Body, Mind and Soul of Sustainable Design of Buildings
G Venkatesh249-253
-
Artificial Intelligence and Environmental Protection of Buildings
Zheng Chen, Yu He254-262
-
Reconstruction of the Urban Historical Centre: Contemporary Problems, Difficulties, and Perspectives
Jawdat Goussous, Kabila Faris Hmood263-267
-
Changing the Narrative of Nature: Towards Sustainability
Atreyee Mukherjee268-272
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
When a company's supply chain has achieved a desirable degree of eco-friendliness in all regards, from a sustainability perspective, its performance will be satisfactory. Since the closed-loop e-waste supply chain's operations are primarily focused on achieving sustainability objectives related to the manufacturing, distribution, reusing, and discarding electrical components, it is crucial to evaluate its success in this area. In order to monitor the performance of supply chains and enhance the processes, the supply chain operations reference model offers suggestions and benchmarking tools. In this study, a conceptual framework is illustrated to show how these standards could be used in the E-waste supply chain to link business processes, metrics, industry standards, and technology in order to enhance the relationship and coordination between the supply chain members and to increase sustainability throughout the supply chain. Insufficient attention so far has been paid to the SCOR model's sustainability criteria, according to an assessment of the literature. Consequently, in the wake of portraying the structure of Supply Chain Operation Reference model, we make sense of which credits should be included in Supply Chain Operation Reference so to reflect manageability and which cycles and practices are related with every standard or should be remembered for Supply Chain Operation Reference to lay out the connection between execution, cycles, and practices.
Keywords:
References
ARJUNA A., SANTOSO S., HERYANTO R. M., 2022, Green Supply Chain Performance Measurement using Green SCOR Model in Agriculture Industry: A Case Study, Jurnal Teknik Industri 24(1): 53-60, https://doi.org/10.9744/JTI.24.1.53-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/jti.24.1.53-60
CHOPRA A., GOLWALA D., CHOPRA A. R., 2022, SCOR (Supply Chain Operations Reference) model in textile industry, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University 57(1): 368-378, https://doi.org/10.35741/ISSN.0258-2724.57.1.33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.57.1.33
DURAN F., ZAFEIRAKOPOULOS, İ.B., 2018, Environmental Risk Assessment of E-waste in Reverse Logistics Systems Using MCDM Methods, Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research: 590-603, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92267-6_49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92267-6_49
GHOSH B., MEKHILEF S., AHMAD S., GHOSH S.K, 2022, A Review on Global Emissions by E-Products Based Waste: Technical Management for Reduced Effects and Achieving Sustainable Development Goals, Sustainability 14(7), 4036, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074036
GOOGLE SCHOLAR, E-waste producing countries, 2020, https//scholar.google.com.
HERVANI A., NANDI S., HELMS M., SARKIS J., 2022, A performance measurement framework for socially sustain-able and resilient supply chains using environmental goods valuation methods, Sustainable Production and Consumption 30(3): 31-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.026
HOSSAIN M., SULALA M.Z.F. HAMADANI A., RAHMAN T., 2015, E-waste: a challenge for sustainable develop-ment, Journal of Health and Pollution 5(9): 3-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-5-9.3
JAIN V., KUMAR S., MOSTOFI A., MOMENI A., 2022, Sustainability performance evaluation of the E-waste closed-loop supply chain with the SCOR model, Waste Management 147: 36-47, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2022.05.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.05.010
KHOKHAR M., 2019, Occupational health & safety implementation framework for Pakistani construction industry in Sindh province, 3C Tecnología. Glosas de innovación aplicadas a la pyme Special Issue: 253-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctecno.2019.specialissue3.253-285
KHOKHAR M., HOU Y., RAFIQUE M. A., IQBAL W., 2020, Evaluating the social sustainability criteria of supply chain management in manufacturing industries: A role of BWM in MCDM, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 15(2): 185-194, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.2.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.2.18
KHOKHAR, M., IQBAL, W., HOU, Y., ABBAS, M., PROCESSES, FATIMA A., 2020, Assessing supply chain performance from the perspective of Pakistan’s manufacturing industry through social sustainability, Processes 8(9): 1064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091064
KHOKHAR M., ZIA S., ISLAM,T., SHARMA A., WASIM I., 2022, Going green supply chain management during COVID-19, assessing the best supplier selection criteria: A triple bottom line (tbl) approach, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 17(1)2022: 36-51, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.04
MAHAR A., MALIK N., R., QADIR A., AHMED, T., KHAN, Z., KHAN, M.L., 2007, Review and Analysis of Current Solid Waste Management Situation in Urban Areas of Pakistan, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Review-and-Analysis-of-Current-Solid-Waste-in-Urban-Mahar-Malik/3c16c763d19186cb3e7cb18b4f2548ad5ca3c0d1.
OZDEMIR D., SHARMA M., DHIR A., DAIM T., 2022, Supply chain resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, Technology in Society 68: 101847, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2021.101847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101847
PRAKASH C., BARUA M.K., 2016, A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry, Sustainable Production and Consumption 7: 66-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.04.001
PRIYADARSHINI, J., SINGH, R., MISHRA, R., BAG S., 2022, Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach, Operations Management Research 15, 567-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00259-7
RAZAVI N., GHOLIZADEH H., NAYERI S., ASHRAFI T. A., 2021, A robust optimization model of the field hospi-tals in the sustainable blood supply chain in crisis logistics, Journal of the Operational Research Society 72(12): 2804-2828, https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1821586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1821586
REHMAN A., MUHAMMAD S., YAQUB R.M,S., 2021, Determining The Influence Of Green Transformational Leadership, Green Innovation And Green Hrm Practices On Environmental Performance Of Hospitality Industry, Bulletin of Business and Economics 10(2): 100-114.
RIAHEE M., ZANDIEH. M., 2018, Disassembly line balancing based on the Kano model and Fuzzy MCDM methods, the case: e-Waste Recycling Line, Journal of Industrial Management Studies 16(49): 1-36.
SABBIR M., KHAN T.T, DAS A.,AKTER S., HOSSAIN A., 2022, Understanding the determinants of consumers’ reverse exchange intention as an approach to e-waste recycling: a developing country perspective, Emerald Insight, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/APJBA-11-2021-0565/full/html?skipTracking=true. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-11-2021-0565
SHAHABUDDIN M., UDDIN M., CHOWDHURY J.I., AHMED S.F., UDDIN M.N., MOFIJUR M., UDDIN MA., 2022, undefined. (n.d.). A review of the recent development, challenges, and opportunities of electronic waste (e-waste), International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 20: 4513-4520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04274-w
SINGH M., PANT M., 2021, A review of selected weighing methods in MCDM with a case study, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 12(1): 126-144, https://doi.org/10.1007/S13198-020-01033-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-01033-3
SUDUSINGHE J. I., SEURING S., 2022, Supply chain collaboration and sustainability performance in circular economy: A systematic literature review, International Journal of Production Economics 245: 108402, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2021.108402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108402
TORTORELLA G., PRASHAR A., SAMSON D., KURNIA S., FOGLIATTO F.S., CAPURRO D., ANTONY J., 2022, Resilience development and digitalization of the healthcare supply chain: an exploratory study in emerging econo-mies, Emerald Insight, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJLM-09-2021-0438/full/html?skipTracking= true. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-09-2021-0438
UDBYE A., 2014, Supply chain risk management in India: An empirical study of sourcing and operations disruptions, their frequency, severity, mitigation methods, and expectations, Portland State University, https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2813&context=open_access_etds.
WANG J., LI W., MISHIMA N., ADACHI T., 2022, Exploring the optimal reverse supply chain for e-waste treatment under Chinese government subsidy, Waste Management 137: 128-138, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2021.10.031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.10.031
XU J., HUANG Y., SHI Y., LI R., 2022, Reverse supply chain management approach for municipal solid waste with waste sorting subsidy policy, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 81: 101180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101180
YONG Y.S., LIM Y.A., ILANKOON I.M.S.K., 2019, An analysis of electronic waste management strategies and recy-cling operations in Malaysia: Challenges and future prospects, Journal of Cleaner Production 224: 151-166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.205
Article Details
Abstract views: 793
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
